What's new

PNS Saif 253 on the way- new pictures!!!!

OHP's Control room will also be upgraded with digital panels as per PN requirements. I like F-22ps panel having a great deal of digitization.
 
OHP's Control room will also be upgraded with digital panels as per PN requirements. I like F-22ps panel having a great deal of digitization.

Do you have a credible source for that bit of info? If yes, please share.
 
No sir i do not have an internet source for this info but i do know some generous folks concerned with the job. Some upgradation is already done in US as PN requested it.
 

in this picture the ship looks all done :yahoo:

the radars are installed, the HQ-7 and all set to go.

hopefully it will soon be sailing home. The third F-22P FFG, named PNS Saif, is scheduled for launch on November 4 from CSSC’s Yard 253 :pakistan:

regadrs!
 
Last edited:
in this picture the ship looks all done :yahoo:

the radars are installed, the HQ-2 and all set to go.

hopefully it will soon be sailing home. The third F-22P FFG, named PNS Saif, is scheduled for launch on November 4 from CSSC’s Yard 253 :pakistan:

regadrs!

HQ2 is a landbased SAM system (version of the russian SA-2). This ship carries HQ7, a development of the French Crotale SAM.
 
looks very better to me but it has to perfom in war time situation i hope she does it in war time for pakistan
 
The third F-22P FFG, named PNS Saif, is scheduled for launch on November 4 from CSSC’s Yard 253

According to Wikipedia, PNS Saif was launched on May 28, 2009. Do you mean it will be commissioned in November4th, 2010 ?

This ship carries HQ7, a development of the French Crotale SAM.

Pakistan should have opted for more capable and longer-range HQ-9.
 
Looks like we will get these on time and then 4 more F23P , an upgraded and modified versions of F22P ships

Not bad buy now we are all looking ahead to our frist OHP largest vessel in our navy in term of frigates :usflag:
 
OHP's Control room will also be upgraded with digital panels as per PN requirements. I like F-22ps panel having a great deal of digitization.

the analog systemz are more reliable and durable than the digitalz...:woot:
but the digital looks good:coffee:
 
As per your logic every weapon system should retain analogue systems then or they just want to provide some eye candy to military men? Reliability is checked before installation my friend. All digital technology in modern warfare has gone through a major R&D process lasting over decades and this will remain the case for years to come. It provides better flexibility, reduced workload, greater situation awareness, ease of operation and reliability.
 
Pakistan should have opted for more capable and longer-range HQ-9.

HQ9, on this a ship this size? You'ld need something the size of the Type 52C or the Type 051C: both ships are twice the displacement of the F22P. There is no room for a sufficient number of missiles (which are MUCH larger than HQ7) and either the Tombstone radar found on 051C or the four phased arrays found on the 052C. In short, it would mean installation of a very expensive sensor suite to control only a limited number (max 16 missiles, if not less).
 
As per your logic every weapon system should retain analogue systems then or they just want to provide some eye candy to military men? Reliability is checked before installation my friend. All digital technology in modern warfare has gone through a major R&D process lasting over decades and this will remain the case for years to come. It provides better flexibility, reduced workload, greater situation awareness, ease of operation and reliability.

I understands what u saying ..but there is one thing called "transients" in digital technology which mostly disrupts the functioning of digital systems for certain moments till they come to normal functions . The transients mostly occurs at starting the systems and are effected by the electromagnetic fields. In heavy electromagnetic fields the digital systems are not more resistant than analogs cuz digitalz are more sensitive than analogs....
Another thing the digitalz are cheaper than anlogs too.
In order to refrain from any problems in the more sound systems ..it is important to have both systems side by side to keep a check on the systemz accuracy.
Mostly the digitalz are preferred for the accuracy, speed and less error but the analogz are preferred for more reliability and durability.
Even then it is alwayz noted that what is the environment of use for each systemz.
my 2 cents bro:coffee:
 
Last edited:
HQ9, on this a ship this size? You'ld need something the size of the Type 52C or the Type 051C: both ships are twice the displacement of the F22P. There is no room for a sufficient number of missiles (which are MUCH larger than HQ7) and either the Tombstone radar found on 051C or the four phased arrays found on the 052C. In short, it would mean installation of a very expensive sensor suite to control only a limited number (max 16 missiles, if not less).

Thanks for the info. HQ9 may not be included with Type 054A frigate that Pakistan Navy may order. Pakistan needs destroyers I hope that they will order Type 052C destroyers from China.
 
Back
Top Bottom