TaimiKhan
SENIOR MODERATOR

- Joined
- Jan 3, 2009
- Messages
- 8,955
- Reaction score
- 10
- Country
- Location
pathetic indian naval chief when he buyed latest P-8 we never cried when we buyed harpoon missile his ............. got burned
Nonononono



Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
pathetic indian naval chief when he buyed latest P-8 we never cried when we buyed harpoon missile his ............. got burned
NEW DELHI — India's navy chief said on Monday that Pakistan's alleged modifications of US-supplied anti-ship missiles to make them capable of striking land targets showed the danger of proliferation.
The New York Times reported Saturday that US officials have complained to Pakistan about modifications of the Harpoon missiles that would make them capable of hitting land targets in neighbouring India.
"This has nothing to do with Pakistan's self-defence and it is against Indian interest," Admiral Sureesh Mehta told reporters in New Delhi.
This shows the "danger of proliferation and we have been telling this from time to time", he said.
The changes to the Harpoons, sold by the US as a defensive weapon during the Cold War in the 1980s, would be a violation of the Arms Control Export Act in the United States, the paper said.
Pakistan has denied the charge, saying it developed the missile itself.
The new weapon would be a key new entry in Pakistan?s arsenal against India, The Times said.
It would enable Pakistan's navy to strike targets on land, complementing the sizable land-based missile arsenal that Pakistan has developed.
The two nuclear-armed South Asian rivals have fought three wars since their 1947 independence from Britain.
The United States has also accused Pakistan of modifying US-made P-3C aircraft for land-attack missions, another violation of US law that the administration of President Barack Obama has protested, the report said.
AFP: India navy chief slams Pak missile 'proliferation'
but in this case...it's the violation of the end-user pact...and it very well is our business to whine...as these modifications would not make us proud.
it woul have been better if Pakistan could take up the mater of indina military massive buildup into the international community. why dont we tell the world that the indian arihant is not usefull to kill another Ajmal Kasab creating a mess in mumbai, nor will be the MRCA be flying against the indian extremists, i wonder why we never make the world realize that in indian aircraft carriers wont grow wheat on there decks to feed milion of there people living without food.
dude...we all whine now don't we?
I remember somebody...your president maybe telling the whole world how the launch of the nuke sub is bringing an arms-race to this part of the world....
it's understandable to whine...but in this case...it's the violation of the end-user pact...and it very well is our business to whine...as these modifications would not make us proud.
In this case its actually still none of your business, but rather the US's business, and no end user violation has been confirmed.
Most reports about the issue from outside analysts suggest that modifying the old harpoons would be unfeasible, given their limitations and given that Pakistan has access to newer and better Chinese missiles.
Tell me when India will stop getting new weapons? huh, my dear It was always india who introduced new weapons in sub continents be it conventional or non conventional , excluding submarines. Pakistan was forced to this made arms race.
If matter is between GOP and GOUS why the ur Naval Chief is so worried?
see...you modify xyz's product...we don't care...but if you get even a lolly-pop bought from the xyz to hurt our civilians or damage anything that is remotely ours...I think it'd be prudent for us to make sure we have XYZ's attention to legally stop the modification in it's tracks.
After all...it'd be us paying a heavier price than the xyz company...
see...you modify xyz's product...we don't care...but if you get even a lolly-pop bought from the xyz to hurt our civilians or damage anything that is remotely ours...I think it'd be prudent for us to make sure we have XYZ's attention to legally stop the modification in it's tracks.
After all...it'd be us paying a heavier price than the xyz company...
There is nothing wrong with the statement! but the popular media really misssed on such a rare occasion.. do you have link to it?dude...we all whine now don't we?
I remember somebody...your president maybe telling the whole world how the launch of the nuke sub is bringing an arms-race to this part of the world....
it's understandable to whine...but in this case...it's the violation of the end-user pact...and it very well is our business to whine...as these modifications would not make us proud.
see...you modify xyz's product...we don't care...but if you get even a lolly-pop bought from the xyz to hurt our civilians or damage anything that is remotely ours...I think it'd be prudent for us to make sure we have XYZ's attention to legally stop the modification in it's tracks.
After all...it'd be us paying a heavier price than the xyz company...
Only reason indians are cry bez they dont want pakistan to get 7.5 Billion $ Aid.
Arihant sure wasnt a lollypop launched to destroy the naxalites; its aimed at Pakistan.
I understand India whining about F-16's; nukes and all that; but us reverse engineering Harpoons while we have better versions of antiship missiles
Come on man India grow up!!