PM Imran Khan addresses to nation about new map of Pakistan

[Pan-Islamic-Pakistan]

Where is junagadh?

It is Bhutto homeland in Gujurat. As a princely state, it acceded to Pakistan, but then India invaded it. Same happened to Hyderabad where Nizam's army were killed by Indians and that state was taken over, although it acceded to Pakistan.

For Kashmir, British sold Kashmir in 1846 to Dogra outsiders and installed them as 'maharaja' against the wishes of Kashmiris.

Kashmiris resisted the Dogras, but were massacred each time by them due to superior arms and British support. The last revolt succeeded in displacing them after they signed Kashmiri fates to India under duress, and paving the way for Pakistan-Indian war.

 

[Osiris]

Pakistan isn't interested in claiming waste land Aksai Chin. We only care about Kashmiri people. What India claim and then surrender in humiliating way to China is of no concern to us.

That is a crap argument since you are claiming Siachen in your new map.

 

[Kabira]

That is a crap argument since you are claiming Siachen in your new map.

Siachin and whole IoK as well.

 

[Osiris]

Comes with lots of caveats and flip side...like India is showing the AJK and GB region of Pakistan in Indian maps but the ground reality is that these territories are under Pak control...this suggests how hapless and weak India is to get areas shown in their maps back through force.

It gives connotations of a weak India...and a strong Pakistan, militarily.

You have become equally weak infact weaker after publishing your new map.
I say weaker because, you could only draw Indian Kashmir, could neither show Chinese occupied Kashmir, nor Chinese claimed Kashmiri land.

 

[Osiris]

Siachin and whole IoK as well.

So is Siachen is not waste land? As per your argument, Pakistan should not be claiming it, since it's uninhibited.

 

[doorstar]

I believe this map will be more offending to Kashmiri people than Indians.

there are part of Tibet which are also under the occupation of superpower2012 (and wrongly called Kashmir). open means that once they (China/Pakistan) evict the superpower, they will negotiate to determine what is Tibet and what is Kashmir (according demography etc.)

 

[Osiris]

there are part of Tibet which are also under the occupation of superpower2012 (and wrongly called Kashmir). open means that once they (China/Pakistan) evict the superpower, they will negotiate to determine what is Tibet and what is Kashmir

@AgNoStiC MuSliM
https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/paki...l-map-of-pakistan.679188/page-6#post-12602097

What will you negotiate, when you can't even draw it on a map.
What kind of country claims an area but can't even draw it's borders.

 

[KAKhan]

I guess this map is a prelude to whats coming. Something is definitely cooking!

 

[alhindi]

@xeuss - Perhaps there is still hope?

Pakistanis, you need to act a bit faster. Once the CAA and NRA comes into full force, these things will remain on the paper and be only of academic interest.

Ideally every single Muslim majority region of India should get a fresh mandate to merge with Pakistan or carve its own identity on its own without depending on the Hindus or Sikhs to define it for them.

Tum apne kagaz dikha dena.

 

[AgNoStiC MuSliM]

What will you negotiate, when you can't even draw it on a map.
What kind of country claims an area but can't even draw it's borders.

How can you draw borders with a friendly country without a final resolution of the disputed territory and negotiations?

 

[ali_raza]

good development

 

[alhindi]

I guess this map is a prelude to whats coming. Something is definitely cooking!

It is cooking from last 70 years .

 

[Osiris]

How can you draw borders with a friendly country without a final resolution of the disputed territory and negotiations?

How does it matter if it's friendly or unfriendly, When you don't even Know, how much land you are claiming?

 

[doorstar]

How can you draw borders with a friendly country without a final resolution of the disputed territory and negotiations?

he knows that full-well. he's just doing the usual indian thing i.e deflect and change subject/topic to something completely different

It is cooking from last 70 years .

it was simmering, now surrendra teli has put it on the boil. what a morooon!

 

[OldenWisdom...قول بزرگ]

The question that many don't ask is...
Is India the inheritor of British India? Was the Raj equally split or left a successor state to maintain former's boundaries, foreign policy, territorial claims?
Here is where people are still bound by a fake construct, a contrived personal limitation... extraordinary compulsions of a bygone era causing great suffering to the contemporaries...
Long live the line in sand or mind or whatever... really!