TankMan
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2014
- Messages
- 3,213
- Reaction score
- 57
- Country
- Location
Even the army has skeletons in it's own closet. The army must be subservient to the parliament, not the PM, that is how the rule of law is suppose to work.
Like I said you are free to believe what you want. But keep in mind, those who have skeletons in their closets are in no bargaining position!
Hypothetically speaking IF the Army has skeletons in it's closet, what is the PM going to do? Take on the wrath of the whole Army?
How it is supposed to work, and how it works are two different things! Seems like you haven't figure it out by now!!!
The Army as an institution can not have 'skeletons in its closet'; Individual generals can, but I doubt the current COAS has any. And even if he did, the entire Army can not be blackmailed by politicians on that basis. The Army's skeletons are irrelevant.
Politicians like the PM, on the other hand, are individuals and corrupt ones. They have very many weaknesses that the Army can exploit if it had to.
However, the military leadership seems to be purposely trying to make things the way they're supposed to by seeking the PM's approval and so on - even if they have to put some pressure on politicians behind the scenes. The idea is to set a precedent for the future, to let the country move forward, despite the short term issues.
I disagree. The military can gain all the support it needs to if it wanted to. They'd easily have public support, and the politicians are very easy to manipulate.How it works is that geopolitics has dictated that the army back off from political interference. The KSA request for soldiers and subsequent rejection, should have been a clear indication of where the army stands today in Pakistan. While still the most respected institution in Pakistan, they know that they cannot interfere in political affairs of the nation. A coup is out of the question, as it would probably destroy Pakistan's current unity.
If anything, it's the military that can't do a thing, while the PM can simply go to parliament, or even the judiciary to gain backing.
The military is no longer the same force that it used to be. It's far too busy fighting a war, and keeping the security situation stable to challenge the political apparatus effectively.
Again, this isn't about what I believe, this is simply the reality of the situation.
If needed, the military can manipulate the political affairs so much that a coup would become an option. They even had opportunities before.
The military is the same force that it used to be, only it's trying to channel all of that force into security and choosing not to involve itself in politics; If they wanted to, they had very good opportunities during the protests, model town chaos, they could've even taken over after the Peshawar attack if they wanted to.
Most probably, the military leadership has made the decision not to directly involve itself in politics and to allow democracy to move forward; some even suggest that it was the military that pushed PMLN and PTI to settle on the rigging investigation commission, and is indirectly trying to influence politics by going after many of the politicians' funding and illegal activities - which is entirely possible though we can't say for certain.
As for the KSA's request being rejected, i doubt that's indicative of anything. The PM himself has very many interests in there; if the Army had to give up on some of its interests, so did the PM and civilian government. This means that either the politicians gave up on their interests and pushed the army to do the same, or the military gave up on its interests in KSA and had the politicians abandon theirs. The second is a lot more likely.