What's new

PLAN Third Type 052C Luyang II class DDG launched

Lankan Ranger

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Aug 9, 2009
Messages
12,550
Reaction score
0
PLAN Third Type 052C Luyang II class DDG launched
16316380178739884091298817283hdvl5edd4SbCrarRdurj.JPG


052+C+III+%252B+IV+2011-02.jpg


XINHUI
 
Dude 052C is the same class as the AGEIS destoryer!

Arleigh Burkes are greater than 10,000 ton with 96 VLS. Type 52C is around 7,000 tons with 48 VLS.

We still need a lot of work.

Its always good to admit weaknesses and keep working on them until you truly are the best.
 
Arleigh Burkes are greater than 10,000 ton with 96 VLS. Type 52C is around 7,000 tons with 48 VLS.

We still need a lot of work.

Its always good to admit weaknesses and keep working on them until you truly are the best.


I think the new one lunched is 052C+ with 64 VLS!
 
Dude 052C is the same class as the AGEIS destoryer!
AEGIS is a combat management network, not a class of destroyer. If you are talking about Arleigh Burke Flight IIA, then no, not even close. It's one thing to be optimistic, but optimism must be grounded in reality.

Americans will continue to rule the Western Pacific for the next 20 years.
 
AEGIS is a combat management network, not a class of destroyer. If you are talking about Arleigh Burke Flight IIA, then no, not even close. It's one thing to be optimistic, but optimism must be grounded in reality.

Americans will continue to rule the Western Pacific for the next 20 years.

Its always good to know your position and your opponents. Otherwise you will always lose.

Despite rapid technological advancement we still need plenty of work to reach parity with Americans.
 
AEGIS is a combat management network, not a class of destroyer. If you are talking about Arleigh Burke Flight IIA, then no, not even close. It's one thing to be optimistic, but optimism must be grounded in reality.

Americans will continue to rule the Western Pacific for the next 20 years.

US can't withdraw from Asia-Pacific. Otherwise, it would cause the domino effect to their global dominance.

However, it would cost them a lot to maintain that huge military expenditures. Meanwhile, China can keep maintaining the pace to catch up.
 
Engine technology seems to be our Achilles heel in everything. Until we can domestically produce naval engines capable of powering a 10,000 ton ship we can not hope to match the Arleigh Burke.
 
Engine technology seems to be our Achilles heel in everything. Until we can domestically produce naval engines capable of powering a 10,000 ton ship we can not hope to match the Arleigh Burke.

They are not fully ready to provide the engine for the huge 10,000 ton+ Aegis destroyer. But the engine for Type 052C is domestically made, Type 051C has more Ukrainian technology.
 
They are not fully ready to provide the engine for the huge 10,000 ton+ Aegis destroyer. But the engine for Type 052C is domestically made, Type 051C has more Ukrainian technology.

Still engines are a F**king pain in the A**. Hope we can resolve it soon. They better not screw up like they did with the WS 10 for so long
 
Engine technology seems to be our Achilles heel in everything. Until we can domestically produce naval engines capable of powering a 10,000 ton ship we can not hope to match the Arleigh Burke.


How about an 8000 ton with 64 VLS?? I am sure it is not hard to jump from 7000 to 8000. Even the Engine should not be difficult.
 
Back
Top Bottom