PLA expert says China will not be a military rival to US for at least 50 years

[Battle of Bach Dang River]

This is i said Game Ruler, that's ur guys never understand ... look at UN, IMF etc international organizations there always saw the Top5. Some Big Boss can easily change human history developing, but u lack that power.

I know that, It is just my fellow got confused a little.
You should also remember that we VN have changed world history by defeating the French, open to the collapse of colonialism in the world....

 

[GR!FF!N]

When a lion roars, you won't mistake it for a mouse. Don't mess with China. We are a big and powerful country.

A "Big and Powerful" doesn't have to deliver dialogue like your comment.everybody knows a "Big and Powerful" when they see one.

 

[ito]

50 years to long...The world will be quite a different place than it now.

I think US, China, India and European Union will be the power centers influencing global events.

 

[cnleio]

I know that, It is just my fellow got confused a little.
You should also remember that we VN have changed world history by defeating the French, open to the collapse of colonialism in the world....

... ... Thanks USSR & Mao's China export Red Revolution, and Military+Fund supports <=== Without Russian or Chinese helps, how to defeat the West weapons, by stone ?

 

[NiceGuy]

Not to 1975, china cut its support North Vietnam from 1968. It is not your Chairman Mao welcomed Nixon in 1972?

CN only reduced, not cut off. If they cut off all support, we would not have enough equipments after Mau Than offensive and 1972 offensive. Learn again the history, bro.

[56] The North Vietnamese would pay a terrible price for this gamble, thanks to U.S. airpower and advisors on the ground, losing an estimated 450 tanks and over 100,000 troops killed in action during the 1972 offensive. [57] China would, again, make up for much of the PAVN equipment lost, after the Paris Peace Treaty was signed, in 1973 and 1974, enabling the North Vietnamese to reconstitute units for another offensive in 1975
Military History Online
- Chinese Support for North Vietnam during the Vietnam War: The Decisive Edge

... ... Thanks USSR & Mao's China export Red Revolution, and Military+Fund supports <=== Without Russian or Chinese helps, how to defeat the West weapons, by stone ?

Chairman Mao was a smart man, help VN also means help CN to break the US's containment.

 

[mike2000]

Yep, the thing that matters to us is our own sovereignty.

Let others police the rest of the world if they want.

Also remember that China has the largest Shale Gas reserves in the world, enough to last thousands of years. Combine that with renewable energy sources (and our massive reserves of almost everything else) and China could one day become self-sufficient in terms of energy. Or we could even return to becoming energy exporters, like we were a few decades ago (when we were a major oil exporter).

This dream is coming closer every day. Within 1-2 decades we will be in a much better position, and technology is only going to improve as time goes on.

Even today's energy efficient technology is a big factor in the collapse of oil prices (soon oil may be cheaper than the barrel itself), imagine the technology of tomorrow. And how efficient it could be.

You people keep going on about 'all what you care about is your sovereignty' and bla bla bla.lool Bro as i said before, you cant simply say all that China cares about and will care about in future is only its sovereignty, yes China cares more about its sovereignty FOR NOW simply because it isnt yet secure and its still an insecure/immature power. But when/if China ever secures its sovereignty(i.e Taiwan and SCS islands), then it too will start venturing abroad/overseas to secure its interests when it grows more powerful and has the assets/power/influence to do it like we in the west/U.S and even Russia have been doing for centuries now. That's the simple truth, i will say it again: ''Untill a poor/weak(er) man gains power/wealth, you simply cant tell what his true intentions/behaviour are/will be''. Simple as that, a poor/weak man is always playing 'humble/nice/kind/non aggressive', but when this changes and he gets the upper hand, then he totally changes lool So its not like the U.S had as objective to be the world policeman from the beginning(note that before WWII the U.S was an isolationist power compared to European powers back then), they had to due to their growing power/influence and events that unfolded overseas. It wont be any different from China or any other rising power. You are only non interventionists because you dont have the capabilities/power/influence to do otherwise(FOR NOW). Case closed.

 

[mike2000]

CN only reduced, not cut off. If they cut off all support, we would not have enough equipments after Mau Than offensive and 1972 offensive. Learn again the history, bro.



Chairman Mao was a smart man, help VN also means help CN to break the US's containment.

True talk, though im surprised to see this coming from you. You seem to be honest/less biased enought o admit facts this time. Kudos to that my firned Its true thaat without Russia and even more so China's military/material/logistics and advisers support during the Vietnam war, the North Vietnamesew would have been defeated/eradicated in a few months at best by the U.S/south vIetnamese forces, anybody who refuses to recognise this fact is just being unnecessarily biased/ultra nationalisic. It kind of reminds me of ultra nationalistic Bengladeshis who refused to recognise that without Indias help/intervention, they will have never suceeded in winning their independence war against Pakistan, Vietnamese members on here are acting the same way. There's no shame in admitting facts(especially a crucial one like this for a country.Moreover the U.S never lost the war per se, they withdrew mainly for political reasons and the war unpopularity back home and in the world at large.

 

[NiceGuy]

True talk, though im surprised to see this coming from you. You seem to be honest/less biased enought o admit facts this time. Kudos to that my firned Its true thaat without Russia and even more so China's military/material/logistics and advisers support during the Vietnam war, the North Vietnamesew would have been defeated/eradicated in a few months at best by the U.S/south vIetnamese forces, anybody who refuses to recognise this fact is just being unnecessarily biased/ultra nationalisic. It kind of reminds me of ultra nationalistic Bengladeshis who refused to recognise that without Indias help/intervention, they will have never suceeded in winning their independence war against Pakistan, Vietnamese members on here are acting the same way. There's no shame in admitting facts(especially a crucial one like this for a country.Moreover the U.S never lost the war per se, they withdrew mainly for political reasons and the war unpopularity back home and in the world at large.

Bro, US didnt fight alone in VN war, so why should we VN fought alone against US and its allies such as Aussie-SK-NATO-PH-Thai_Sing etc ??

If US fought one on one wt VN, I didnt think they could win, too coz its nearest territory Guam is still too far from VN

US lost in VN war, thats why they must give up to VN the important oil shipping lane from Singapore to Guam in SCS(east sea)

 

[scholseys]

The Americans are assured by these comments and will abandon all their military projects. Thread closed

 

[UKBengali]

Major General Yin Zhuo said that China’s military strength will not be a rival to the US even 50 years? At this point does anyone think that the U.S. would not have advanced further by another 50 years?

In other words, China will never ever be able to catch up with the U.S. Period!

Very illogical comment.

No-one in history has ever stayed on top forever.

The US will lose it's position as No 1 at some time - the question is when.

 

[OrionHunter]

Very illogical comment.

No-one in history has ever stayed on top forever.

The US will lose it's position as No 1 at some time - the question is when.

Ok, so keeping your logic in mind, no one has stayed at the bottom forever. So do we expect Bangla Desh to become the next super power by 2050?

 

[gambit]

Very illogical comment.

No-one in history has ever stayed on top forever.

It is YOU who are illogical. In order to declare that no one have been at the top forever, you have to know how long is forever, which defeats the purpose of what is forever in the first place.

The US will lose it's position as No 1 at some time - the question is when.

Not in this lifetime, or not even your grandchildren's lifetime.

 

[NiceGuy]

Not in this lifetime, or not even your grandchildren's lifetime.

It depends, if Russia-CN keep supporting VN to kick US out of ASEAN region, then US's power will be weaken dramatically, so Russia will have a chance to take Guam , CN can take back TW.

 

[Nike]

It depends, if Russia-CN keep supporting VN to kick US out of ASEAN region, then US's power will be weaken dramatically, so Russia will have a chance to take Guam , CN can take back TW.

@NiceGuy strike back

LoL

 

[NiceGuy]

@NiceGuy strike back

LoL

Thats the truth. If Russia-CN support VN to unify sub-Mekong region plus Singapore-Malaysia, Im sure that US will just sit and watch . No US soldiers wanna fight with VN again, and why must they fight against VN when ASEAN is not they home land ??

So, US will no longer exit in ASEAN if CN leader Xi is smart like chairman Mao .