What's new

PLA at China-India border has upgraded logistics to brave winter. India can't cover its inadequate logistics

@beijingwalker you forgot very important Items provided to PLA soldiers deployed at LAC. Quick dry diapers.
https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/chin...wear-as-they-face-the-ladakh-warriors.694619/


It's not a laughing matter, the devil is in the details. In -40°C, a warm shelter, a hot meal and a set of dry cloth, may be enough to turn Indian soldiers into POWs. Look at those IA soldiers in PLA's captivity, they are not physically disabled but rather, they are mentally crashed:

1637743291460.png
 
Yeah why not open a Grand Hyatt hotel at the LAC and make a grand documentary about how imperial chinese fauj is living 5 star life along the Indo-Tibetan border and how poor baniyas are suffering in the cold :lol:.

Indeed. Poor dirt indian like you deserve to live in poverty and poor condition.

If not, why Jawan keep shooting their own people. :lol:

 
Indeed. Poor dirt indian like you deserve to live in poverty and poor condition.

If not, why Jawan keep shooting their own people. :lol:

China must’ve been the richest on earth aren’t they?
And we aren’t perfect military like PLA where everone’s a superhuman.

Seems like 10k PCG makes Han the richest on earth :lol:
 
China must’ve been the richest on earth aren’t they?
And we aren’t perfect military like PLA where everone’s a superhuman.

Seems like 10k PCG makes Han the richest on earth :lol:
Not the richest, but much better than India, the only enemy these PLA soldiers are facing there in the harsh winter plateau.
 
Oct. of the next year will mark the 60th anniversary of "Sino-India Border War of 1962". If by then China and India still can't reach a consensus, a lot more 1962 battle photos and videos will be released by China. It will put a pressure on India government to release its "Henderson Brooks-Bhagat report" , which has been kept out off public critique for 60 years. If that's the case, we can expect a major public meltdown in India.

They would never declassify that report; because that report implies India to be the aggressor in 1962 War.
 
They would never declassify that report; because that report implies India to be the aggressor in 1962 War.
India was. China was in the worst shape in 1962, enemy of both US and Soviet Union, wide spread food shortage. China almost begged India to have a land swap solution, but India just arrogantly rejected it. India saw China's vulnerability and just wanted to kick China when China was down.
 
India was. China was in the worst shape in 1962, enemy of both US and Soviet Union, wide spread food shortage. China almost begged India to have a land swap solution, but India just arrogantly rejected it. India saw China's vulnerability and just wanted to kick China when China was down.

Yes. That was precisely the case.
 
India was. China was in the worst shape in 1962, enemy of both US and Soviet Union, wide spread food shortage. China almost begged India to have a land swap solution, but India just arrogantly rejected it. India saw China's vulnerability and just wanted to kick China when China was down.
Indians came back in 2020 when China was under attacks from the only super power and covid.
 
Careful now, your relatives in Zhonghua may lose their organs for your outbursts

Epoch times is quoting Zhonghua sources -



View attachment 796922

Even Hong kong media sources mention the same, though not sure if CCP is so Han enough to do something so bizzare

New self-destruct system installed for Tibetan troops: Chinese media


西藏解放军最新装备 : 军官有权启动士兵自毁装置
You guys are much better at kneeling down and pulling ears rather than making fake bs.
FDjjz-MaQAEMzVd.jpg
 
Careful now, your relatives in Zhonghua may lose their organs for your outbursts

Epoch times is quoting Zhonghua sources -



View attachment 796922

Even Hong kong media sources mention the same, though not sure if CCP is so Han enough to do something so bizzare

New self-destruct system installed for Tibetan troops: Chinese media


西藏解放军最新装备 : 军官有权启动士兵自毁装置

Screen shot you attached (Guancha) did not mention anything about "自毁装置“;

Your first link had the following text: Apple Daily reporter did not find any description about "self destruction device" in original Guancha article;
1637963347261.png


Your 2nd link is an article on RFA , referred to the same Guancha article.

See, you are either maliciously lying, or you are foolishly been brainwashed.
 
Back
Top Bottom