What's new

Pictures of Crashed J-10 surfaces after three years

Status
Not open for further replies.

jha

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Dec 19, 2009
Messages
10,962
Reaction score
-8
Country
India
Location
India
Pictures of Crashed J-10 surfaces after three years

3f175fb79295a453a319d3d4284026cf.jpg



Pictures of the J-10 of the Chinese air force which went down almost three years ago has surfaced on internet ,Crash of J-10 was earlier reported in local media of Guilin in year 2007 , J-10 was of the PLAAF 2nd Air Division . Most of the Crashes of PLAAF are never reported in Main stream media .


a4c719b2fb9876a3f9fb9912c947bd4b.jpg



http://idrw.org/?p=1015
 
J10 and J7 look similar and have similar color scheme but it seems to be a J10 because of Delta wing and Cnards.

anyway sad incident..i hope the pilot was safe and there is no damage on the ground which seems to be a great effort by PLAAF Pilot.
 
J10 and J7 look similar and have similar color scheme but it seems to be a J10 because of Delta wing and Cnards.

anyway sad incident..i hope the pilot was safe and there is no damage on the ground which seems to be a great effort by PLAAF Pilot.

chill.. its not in Pakistan as evident from the local Chinese standing nearby...
 
chill.. its not in Pakistan as evident from the local Chinese standing nearby...

when did i say that it is in Pakistan..did you even read my post ?
 
It was reported by the local media that a J-10 of the PLAAF 2nd Air Division crashed near Guilin in 2007, the recently surfaced internet photos seem to confirm that report.
J-10-1269423429_94991.jpg




J-10-1269423721_65328.jpg
J-10-1269422877_96170.jpg
 
Pictures of Crashed J-10 surfaces after three years

View attachment 134758


Pictures of the J-10 of the Chinese air force which went down almost three years ago has surfaced on internet ,Crash of J-10 was earlier reported in local media of Guilin in year 2007 , J-10 was of the PLAAF 2nd Air Division . Most of the Crashes of PLAAF are never reported in Main stream media .


View attachment 134759


http://idrw.org/?p=1015
These pics come again, J-10 had crashed ever, but these pics are PSed, and not new posted, these pics were first posted at a thread of Forum at China.com(just as post here), can check the time: 2010-03-26 on the site
惨!网友曝中国歼10坠毁恐怖场面图--军事频道_中华网
无标题.jpg


And J-10 had crashed in 2011.10(first crash) and 2014.11.15, this is the crash pics at 2014.11.15, you will find the difference when a plan crash
cd7e1a01213fb80ee601a48335d12f2eb838942e.jpg

W020141117092656685487.jpg
 
Did the pilot eject safely.
Yes its j10 with that yellow smudge on tail and orange star on sides. Sad. But i hope pilot was safe. noone can compare indian tejas with j10,j10 etc are a class apart. So stop trying to post accidents as if so and so defence equipment is shoddy in quality.
 
Air crashes are pretty sad but really normal all over the world.

China isn't really making itself look perfect by hiding them away.

Hope that the pilot ejected safely.

Did the pilot eject safely.

I too hope that man.

Yes its j10 with that yellow smudge on tail and orange star on sides. Sad. But i hope pilot was safe. noone can compare indian tejas with j10,j10 etc are a class apart.

FYI Tejas has not had a single incident, let alone crash.

No one is comparing J-10 with Tejas.

So stop trying to post accidents as if so and so defence equipment is shoddy in quality.

It is a crash pic that was hidden from people to make them believe that everything is perfect.

J-10 is also made by humans which made F-16s, Tejas, Mirage, Gripen etc. Mistakes happen by both makers, pilots, maintenance etc.

No one is showing anything other than the reality.
 
These pics come again, J-10 had crashed ever, but these pics are PSed, and not new posted, these pics were first posted at a thread of Forum at China.com(just as post here), can check the time: 2010-03-26 on the site
...

Why should these are being psed ? IMO they are real and there is nothing special about them since it depends on the situation and underground the aircrfat crashes. The Crash in Guilin years ago was well covered in the local media and since it slid more on a softer, muddy ground - in comparison to the recent crash into a building - there is nothing special that both aircrafts Look different.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom