Viper0011.
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 15, 2011
- Messages
- 7,253
- Reaction score
- 26
- Country
- Location
Yes, I have an answer and it's pretty much black and white. No bigger power would want its enemies to grow economically and create stronger ties with others when there are sanctions being put on to them. So, naturally, the US wouldn't want ANYONE to be doing business with the Iranians. These large infrastructure projects will put billions into their crippled economy. The US doesn't want that. This is no different than Pakistan not wanting the Afghanistan to have a gov't or relationships that are against Pakistan's sovereignty or national security.....same thing goes for India in Nepal, Sri Lanka and other places. I personally don't think that the American public are 'against' Iran in a way they were against the Talibans (due to 911 attacks). These sanctions are primarily to force Iran into abandoning its nuclear program which is dangerous for the world and for the region that YOU live in. If the US was REALLY an enemy of Iran, I am SURE the US military would've received call of duty a long time ago and by now, Iran would not be left running ANY nuclear arms programs. The US can definitely guarantee the removal of its sites. No doubt about it. But I think the administration wants Iran to give that up without a conflict, which is how diplomacy should work. Wars should be the last resort!
Last edited by a moderator:
