What's new

Pentagon report says Iran is fielding anti-ship ballistic missiles

yavar

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Mar 20, 2013
Messages
5,988
Reaction score
-4
Country
Iran, Islamic Republic Of
Location
Iran, Islamic Republic Of
Pentagon report says Iran is fielding anti-ship ballistic missiles
a2a51dac6138.jpg

08 September 2014
Iran's Khalij Fars anti-ship ballistic missile (AShBM) - a weapon that could shift the military balance in the Gulf region - is being delivered to operational units, according to the US Department of Defense's annual report to Congress on the Islamic Republic's military capabilities.

"Tehran is quietly fielding increasingly lethal symmetric and asymmetric weapon systems, including more advanced naval mines, small but capable submarines, coastal defence cruise missile batteries, attack craft, and anti-ship ballistic missiles," the report's declassified executive summary said.

This is the first corroboration of Iranian claims that the AShBM is in service. US officials declined to comment further on the report, which was submitted to Congress in January.

The Khalij Fars is a version of the Fateh-110 tactical ballistic missile with an electro-optical (EO) seeker that enables it to home in on a ship's infrared signature in its terminal phase. The Iranian media has reported that the missile has the same 300 km range and 650 kg warhead as the more recent versions of the Fateh-110.

Vice Admiral James Syring, the director of the US Missile Defense Agency, submitted a statement to a Congressional subcommittee in June saying: "This ballistic missile has a range of 300 km, which means it is capable of threatening maritime activity throughout the Persian Gulf and Strait of Hormuz." Vice Adm Syring confirmed the AShBM had been flight tested, but did not comment on whether it was operational.

The Khalij Fars would be harder to intercept than Iran's conventional anti-ship missiles due to its significantly higher velocity (said to be Mach 3) and parabolic trajectory.

The missile was first unveiled in February 2011, when Iran released footage apparently showing it hitting a stationary ship. A second test was announced in July 2012, when Iranian television showed footage that appeared to have been filmed by the missile's seeker as it homed in on a floating platform that was moving.

While the Iranian media has reported since the February 2011 unveiling that the missile was being mass produced, it was not until 5 March 2014 that the Ministry of Defence held a ceremony in which multiple Khalij Fars were officially delivered to the military.

The eight Khalij Fars that featured in the ceremony had the tip of their noses covered by a protective cap, making it impossible to see the EO seeker that distinguishes them from the Fateh-110.

Analysts have previously been sceptical of Iran's AShBM programme. A paper published by the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) on 14 August said: "Experts feel … Iran has little or no operational capability to use the Khalij Fars … or any ballistic missile or long-range rocket in the anti-ship [role]."

The CSIS report said Iran did not have an effective way to acquire and track over-the-horizon targets so that the missile's guidance system could be programmed and then updated during flight to ensure its seeker could find the target in its terminal phase.

It nevertheless said: "Iran potentially could alter the regional naval balance if it ever did reach such a level of sophistication in guidance, range, reliability, and operational accuracy.

Pentagon report says Iran is fielding anti-ship ballistic missiles - IHS Jane's 360
 
.
Okay, let's say they do have it. Let's discuss how it changes the balance of naval power in the region.

I personally don't think it'll have much of an over all impact against navies that are the real threats to Iran, such as the US naval forces. 1 carrier group is all the US needs to neutralize Iran's naval capabilities, even if Iran has AShBMs in large numbers. Iran may have done more damage, but the end result would still be a US victory.
 
.
Here goes their bullshit again.
And whats usa's problem??

Iran can field whatever they want:coffee:

Okay, let's say they do have it. Let's discuss how it changes the balance of naval power in the region.

I personally don't think it'll have much of an over all impact against navies that are the real threats to Iran, such as the US naval forces. 1 carrier group is all the US needs to neutralize Iran's naval capabilities, even if Iran has AShBMs in large numbers. Iran may have done more damage, but the end result would still be a US victory.

Iran will be completely trounced,,it will be a total massacre if it comes to that but it won't happen.
Iran is not a dictatorship and usa has no reason to attack it
 
. .
We can defend ourselves very well!
Of course, and so call Pakistan, but during an all out war, the USA would trump us. It's a simple fact, and the only reason why the US hasn't authorized Israel to attack Iran yet is because the US just don't want to start another fight.
 
.
so call Pakistan, .
please can you explain here how can Pakistan defend it self or retaliate against any U.S attack on Pakistan ?? i mean how Pakistan going to defend it self ?? by attacking India ??

Of course, ].
SOHEILdoes not mean that Iran can defend itself by attacking U.S war ship or we got good air defense or attacking Israel .he meaning some thing totally different when he said we can defend yourself .
 
Last edited:
.
please can you explain here how can Pakistan defend it self or retaliate against any U.S attack ??
With it's military.

You know, I've had this exact conversation before, and I get the feeling that you won't ever agree that Pakistan can defend itself better than Iran can.

So I'm not even going to bother.
 
.
With it's military. better than Iran can..
thank you i could not comprehend that . but it's ok with me .
With it's military.you won't ever agree that Pakistan can defend itself.
is not about me agree with you or not . I just wanted to know what would be the scenario if U.S start bombing Pakistan .can you give us tip of this Pakistan military be able to do against U.S ?? maybe I am wrong but you do want tell me you going to attack India ?? do they ?? what i would like to know that Pakistan going to do about the U.S not any other country
 
Last edited:
.
thank you i could not comprehend that . but it's ok with me .
is not about me agree with you or not . I just wanted to know what would be the scenario if U.S start bombing Pakistan .can you give us tip of this Pakistan military be able to do against U.S ?? maybe I am wrong but you do want tell me you going to attack India ?? do they ?? what i would like to know that Pakistan going to do about the U.S not any other country
If you want a scenario, fine. When it comes to naval warfare, PN has anti-ship ballistic missiles, and asymmetrical naval warfare capabilities meant to engage larger forces (namely India). The PA has conventional and asymmetrical capabilities, and the PAF has air defence capabilities like the Spada-2000 and F-16 along with JF-17s. If the worst comes to worst, PA has tactical nuclear weapons with limited yield, meant to destroy armored columns.

Then again, Pakistan doesn't ever have to worry about a US invasion, as it would be against US national interests to do so. Regardless of public politics, Pakistan and the US are still deep allies, despite the US moving towards India.

Iran's capabilities, while admirable, are not so good because of decades of sanctions. While Iran has made domestic advances, they're nowhere near the level they need to be in order to counter US and Russian equipment. Heck, they're not even at the level of China. Iran does, however, have a more developed defense industry than the Arabs have, but if current trends continue, that may not be the case for much longer.

Iran needs to get sanctions lifted fully, so that it can start importing technology that it can study, and so that it can start building defense relations with nations with decent militarizes.
 
.
300km is not enough, you need to increase its range to at least 1500km with the capability of carrying a single 1-2 tons warhead.
 
Last edited:
. . .
Iran's capabilities, while admirable, are not so good because of decades of sanctions. .
ccan you explain on this bit more .what does Iran need to have so that their capabilities become good in your understanding
that it can start importing technology that it can study,.
thank you :)
Idefense relations with nations with decent militarizes.
who are these nations with decent militaries ?? what countries you think it be ok and Iran need to make relations with
 
Last edited:
.
Last edited:
.
If you want a scenario, fine. When it comes to naval warfare, PN has anti-ship ballistic missiles, and asymmetrical naval warfare capabilities meant to engage larger forces (namely India). The PA has conventional and asymmetrical capabilities, and the PAF has air defence capabilities like the Spada-2000 and F-16 along with JF-17s. If the worst comes to worst, PA has tactical nuclear weapons with limited yield, meant to destroy armored columns.

Then again, Pakistan doesn't ever have to worry about a US invasion, as it would be against US national interests to do so. Regardless of public politics, Pakistan and the US are still deep allies, despite the US moving towards India.

Iran's capabilities, while admirable, are not so good because of decades of sanctions. While Iran has made domestic advances, they're nowhere near the level they need to be in order to counter US and Russian equipment. Heck, they're not even at the level of China. Iran does, however, have a more developed defense industry than the Arabs have, but if current trends continue, that may not be the case for much longer.

Iran needs to get sanctions lifted fully, so that it can start importing technology that it can study, and so that it can start building defense relations with nations with decent militarizes.

Brother ... you know nothing about background ! :)

Do you know how many military equipments lost in Russia & Ukrain after Collapse of the Soviet union !

I can give you 2 from the long list !

R-36M

UR-100N

:)

Belive it or not ... i can prove it in future !

pre_1408613415__kslc_1.jpg


pre_1408613368__kslc_1big.jpg


be1.gif


300km is not enough, you need to increase its range to at least 1500km with the capability of a single 1-2 tons warhead.

we have other versions !
 
Last edited:
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom