vishwambhar
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 22, 2020
- Messages
- 2,094
- Reaction score
- -19
- Country
- Location
Now hope at least now onward no PDFer will ever believe in the nonsense story of Flanker kill.... Thanks @Tejas Spokesman .....
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
how embarrasing, salvaging some pride... evven the pilots wearing this must be embarrased... shame on IAF...if only one was fired then why did you reward your Sqd
if eel bad for you, doing your best to dodge the facts that even after 1.5 years your proofs validates PAF's storyAs per PAF only one was fired.
Another delusional indian high on the GM syrup hereNow hope at least now onward no PDFer will ever believe in the nonsense story of Flanker kill.... Thanks @Tejas Spokesman .....
Now hope at least now onward no PDFer will ever believe in the nonsense story of Flanker kill.... Thanks @Tejas Spokesman .....
Then you could have produced the DOOSRA BANDA (Flanker pilot) who was in your custody as per your ISPR
please show me one evidence , that a Su-30MKI was hit last year , I several times ask for evidence and only get this replay but never evidence that back it upAfter multiple neutral third parties have concluded that an F16 downed a SU30 last year. IAF's troll army has to come out to spit any non sense to counter. Its hilarious.
And as per IAF, PAF F-16 fired 4-5 AMRAAMsAs per PAF only 1 AMRAAM was fired at Su-30s. Though I cannt rule out if more were fired or not.
It’s beating a dead horse by now but after 1.5 years Pakistan still has not provided any evidence of ever hitting yet alone downing any MKI. The question becomes, why if Pakistan claimed to hit an MKI they did not release any evidence?
Even F-16.net was forced to admit that their source was only Alan Warnes (a journalist with extremely extremely close ties to PAF for many years)
http://www.f-16.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=57254&sid=4d6b2407eba5ac840c3211f2c80decfc
Even Alan Warnes admitted that his AFM article (Su-30 claim ) was entirely copied from PAF Kaiser Tufail blog.
So again, where is proof? It can’t be for “classified” reasons because even Americans often release proof of kills, or at the least the wreckage of kills claimed by America often is found. In Pakistan’s case not only have they not released any proof of anything but no wreckage has ever been found. We know the general area where the MKI was operating but no one found the wreckage, pilots or took video or photos.
So the MKI is 72’ in length, can hold up to 20,700lbs fuel, and can have a maximum take off weight of 76,000lbs but no wreckage? How does an aircraft that large just vanish? How would no one notice a fireball and smoke that would probably rise 500-1000+ feet? Is it a cover up? In that case why India did not cover up the MI-17 downing? India let hostile enemy civilians come up to the wreckage and even take photos. Ironically the MI-17 crashed only 250 metres outside an Indian paramilitary base, yet India could not and did not cover up the wreckage.
So to recap:
No HUD
No radar data
No satellite images of wreckage
No audio release of Indians acknowledging a downing
No identity of downed pilots
No tail number
No wreckage
No missing or dead fighter pilots
No smoke plumes or fireball
No photos of any kind
No videos
No witnesses
No acknowledgement from India (both officially or unofficially) of losing any MKI.
Kashmir situation is tense. Operational secrecy means that smoking gun evidence such as radar info that you desire will not be released publicly. Unfortunately the wreckage landed in India or this wouldn't be a debate.please show me one evidence , that a Su-30MKI was hit last year , I several times ask for evidence and only get this replay but never evidence that back it up