What's new

PARS 3 LR Competes for Two Indian Attack Helicopter Programs

Joined
Apr 16, 2011
Messages
455
Reaction score
-15
Country
India
Location
India
1kwmo.jpg

PARS 3LR anti-tank missile launched from a German Army Tiger attack helicopter during a recent test conducted at the test range in Vidsel, Sweden. Photo: MBDA

MBDA confirmed today that its PARS 3 Long Range (LR) guided missile system has been short listed for the Indian Army helicopter future air-to-ground requirement. MBDA Deutschland is also cooperating with Russian helicopter manufacturers Kamov and Mil, integrating the Ka-52 and Mi-28 with PARS 3 LR air/ground and Mistral Air/Air missiles.

MBDA submitted a proposals for its PARS 3 LR multi-target, long range weapon system for HAL’s Advanced Light Helicopter (ALH DHRUV) and for two attack helicopters, the KAMOV KA-52 and the MIL MI-28, proposed for a parallel Indian Air Force replacement of Mi-25 gunships. The Tiger from Eurocopter hasn’t been shortlisted, the only competitor remaining is the Boeing Apache Longbow Block III. On the weapon’s side MBDA is competing with RAFAEL for the Indian Army program. The Longbow can use Hellfire laser guided missiles or Longbow MMW guided missiles. MBDA is expecting a final selection in India by year’s end or early 2012. The Indian Air Force program may take longer.

According to Peter Meuthen, MBDA anti-tank programs sales manager, the recent firing trials held at the Vidsel test range in Sweden in April 2011 were performed in support of the Indian program qualification. All three missiles were equipped with live warheads and all three struck their intended targets at the optimal hit points. Two firings were carried out within one minute of each other, the first against a static target at a range of 7,000 m and the second against a moving target at a range of 700 m. The third firing was carried out with the helicopter in fast forward flight against a static target at a range of 7,000 m.

PARS 3 LR is a ‘Fire and Forger’ /long-range third generation missile. At present, the missile was selected only for the Tiger helicopter ordered by the German Army. Equipped with a powerful tandem warhead, PARS 3 is capable of engaging mobile and stationary targets at long range (in the recent tests the missile demonstrated engagement at ranges of 7,000 m’. Another capability highlighted by the weapon is the rapid firing capability, in a recent test conducted for the German Bundeswehr four missiles were launched in 10 seconds, each engaging a separate target.

MBDA Deutschland is currently preparing for serial production of PARS 3 LR missiles delivering 680 missiles to equip German Army Tiger helicopters by 2014. Production is scheduled to begin in 2012 following a final firing campaign scheduled for September 2011, where missiles will be fired at tactical representative targets rain (urban, moving targets etc). According to Patrick de la Reveliere, MBDA India the each of the two programs in Indian is several times larger than the German procurement, offering substantial gain and significant offset opportunities to India. MBDA Deutchland is setting a production line capable of producing 50 missiles per month, more than twice that required to fulfil the German order (up to 20 /month).

The contract for industrialisation and series production of the PARS 3 LR missiles will be managed by PARSYS, a joint venture between LFK-Lenkflugkörpersysteme GmbH (50%), now MBDA Deutschland, and Diehl BGT Defence (50%). Development of the overall PARS 3 LR system was formally completed in mid-2004. However, MBDA Deutschland has been manufacturing key components (electronics, launchers) of the PARS 3 LR system which have then been integrated by Eurocopter into the platform since the series production contract for the 80 Tiger helicopters was signed in 1998.

2r76ihj.jpg
The PARS 3LR weapon was developed under a three-nation cooperation (TRIGAT), which fell apart upon the withdrawal of British support. Later, the French MOD decided to discontinue its support leaving Germany to back the program. A possible Indian order could bring the missile back to the limelight. Photo: Tamir Eshel, defense Update

http://defense-update.com/wp/20110622_pars3lr_mbda.html
 
. . . .
The selection of Mi-28 NE's chances increases with the addition of PARS-3 LR.It is a great long range ATGM.
 
.
MBDA submitted a proposals for its PARS 3 LR multi-target, long range weapon system for HAL’s Advanced Light Helicopter (ALH DHRUV) and for two attack helicopters, the KAMOV KA-52 and the MIL MI-28, proposed for a parallel Indian Air Force replacement of Mi-25 gunships.

The title was a bit misleading, because it's actually only one Indian helicopter, but it confirms what I said before, that IA wants this missile for their Dhruv WSI, that will be inducted by the end of the year.


What happened to Nag missile?

NAG is the version for IA ground forces, the air launched version is called HELINA (HELIcopter NAg) and is under development, so PARS 3 is a stop gap.


.
.
Nag is a short range heat seeking missile, where as PARAS-3 is a long range, thus both have there utility in army.

HELINA and PARS 3 has the same range of up to 8Km, but there is also a Helina version under development, with a range of up to 20Km.


The selection of Mi-28 NE's chances increases with the addition of PARS-3 LR.It is a great long range ATGM.

The Mi 28 and Apaches are for IAF, not for IA and unfortunately they could use different weapons for the same helicopters. I wouldn't be surprised if IAF chooses Israeli LAHAT, or SPIKE (developed initially from the same manufacturer that developed PARS, German Diehl BGT)) missiles for their Dhruvs, or LCH later.
 
.
The title was a bit misleading, because it's actually only one Indian helicopter, but it confirms what I said before, that IA wants this missile for their Dhruv WSI, that will be inducted by the end of the year.




NAG is the version for IA ground forces, the air launched version is called HELINA (HELIcopter NAg) and is under development, so PARS 3 is a stop gap.




HELINA and PARS 3 has the same range of up to 8Km, but there is also a Helina version under development, with a range of up to 20Km.




The Mi 28 and Apaches are for IAF, not for IA and unfortunately they could use different weapons for the same helicopters. I wouldn't be surprised if IAF chooses Israeli LAHAT, or SPIKE (developed initially from the same manufacturer that developed PARS, German Diehl BGT)) missiles for their Dhruvs, or LCH later.

I know that Mi-28 and Apache are for IAF.
 
.
NAG is the version for IA ground forces, the air launched version is called HELINA (HELIcopter NAg) and is under development, so PARS 3 is a stop gap.




HELINA and PARS 3 has the same range of up to 8Km, but there is also a Helina version under development, with a range of up to 20Km.

Pars 3 is no gap filler. Its the best the market has to offer. The indian missile, whatever it might be called will have an inferior performance. 8km is more then enough since the helicopter wont ever lock upon targets bejond 5km.
 
.
I know that Mi-28 and Apache are for IAF.

That's why IA selecting PARS 3, won't be an advatage for Mi 28 in an competition of IAF.


Pars 3 is no gap filler. Its the best the market has to offer. The indian missile, whatever it might be called will have an inferior performance. 8km is more then enough since the helicopter wont ever lock upon targets bejond 5km.

It is, because it's a bridge till the time HELINA will be available and that has nothing to do with the capability of the missile.
 
.
That's why IA selecting PARS 3, won't be an advatage for Mi 28 in an competition for the IAF

read the article it states the MBDA will submit proposal of integrating PARS-3 with Mi-28.thats why commented.
 
.
Pars 3 is no gap filler. Its the best the market has to offer. The indian missile, whatever it might be called will have an inferior performance. 8km is more then enough since the helicopter wont ever lock upon targets bejond 5km.
PARS 3 is a gap filling tool for us.:woot:
@the emboldened part-Dont be so cocky:disagree:
 
.
can anyone tell me how many lch and apache/mi 28 is going to be inducted by iaf and how many lch and dhruv wsi are going to be inducted in the army? ??
 
.
read the article it states the MBDA will submit proposal of integrating PARS-3 with Mi-28.thats why commented.

I know, but that doesn't increase the chances of selection, because the Apache still has the latest Hellfire and soon gets the more capable JAGM, so only commonality would be an additional advantage, but that's what I meant, IAF might not use PARS 3 on any of their helicopters like IA does.
However, it seems that the Apache wins that competition anyway, so more interesting is what other alternatives would be available for Dhruv WSI?

LAHAT for example:


k37zlz.jpg


http://www.iai.co.il/sip_storage/FILES/7/35217.pdf


Or SPIKE ER:

Missile_MBDA_2007_spike_tiger.png


http://www.rafael.co.il/marketing/SIP_STORAGE/FILES/3/463.pdf
 
.
can anyone tell me how many lch and apache/mi 28 is going to be inducted by iaf and how many lch and dhruv wsi are going to be inducted in the army? ??

Total orders...i.e,Both IAF and IAAC combined-50 odd WSI Dhruv's,180 LCH's,22 Heavy attack helo's(without the follow on order)
 
.
Total orders...i.e,Both IAF and IAAC combined-50 odd WSI Dhruv's,180 LCH's,22 Heavy attack helo's(without the follow on order)

thanx i guess ia should go for apache as it has more scope of devolopment in the future but for heavy transport heli tender russian mi 's are more capable then the chinook.
 
.

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom