Panama leak Case Proceedings - JIT Report, News, Updates And Discussion

[expert]

It is not possible to declare & not receive as per UAE Labour law, Wage Protection is there for only this reason- Whatever salary is mentioned in the Employment Contract should be credited into the Employee Account... Salary was being transferred to NS Account in UAE,

The respondents probably knew this and that is why they submitted the reply so late so nobody will be able to rebut.

 

[Emmie]

But disqualification on contested/ challenged docs/ facts?

Challenging a fact does not necessarily mean the fact is not true, it's the court which decides what is true.

 

[Farah Sohail]

Hosakta hai aap theek hon.. But I agree with my friend's assessment that SC is the last court and they consider even a small chit, or they warn that this is the last day of submission of 1,2,3 .....

This argument is not possible at all... Is case main koi ek jhoot nahi....hazar jhoot sabit hochukay hain... Qatari letter bhi jhoot sabit hochuka hai

Justice Ijazul Ahsan also is in favor of complete justice, rather than technical justice.. I quoted the para yesterday here from his judgment

 

[FlyingAce]

The respondents probably knew this and that is why they submitted the reply so late so nobody will be able to rebut.

They knew the UAE Labour Law, & other also know what the law is, Logic says that These docs won't be accepted by the judges reason being Judgement is reserved, & the fact that A Rebuttal by lawyers of Petitioners are required as per Article 10A!

 

[PakSword]

No, nothing has been declared, neither the source nor the income. Source that does not generate any income shouldn't be a source in first place, logic 101. It's the income which matters, you can't justify income without a source, so definitely both.

But he submitted the copy of his visa, that shows his occupation and employer?

 

[QatariPrince]

Kindly make a poll on possible verdict. @ mods

 

[PakSword]

Kindly make a poll on possible verdict. @ mods

What's your opinion? I am not too hopeful..

 

[Emmie]

But he submitted the copy of his visa, that shows his occupation and employer?

Submitting a passport copy is declaration? There's a a separate section in nomination papers called statement of assets and liabilities, it shows zilch. Form 21 which has to be filed by every MNA shows nothing.

Besides it was never about Iqama, it was about salary.

 

[QatariPrince]

What's your opinion? I am not too hopeful..

Trial Court. No disqualification

 

[PakSword]

Submitting a passport copy is declaration? There's a a separate section in nomination papers called statement of assets and liabilities, it shows zilch. Form 21 which has to be filed by every MNA shows nothing.

I have read somewhere that they are saying there was no separate place to declare this fact... But they submitted the visa.. which means NS declared his occupation and employer's name..

I mean I am just saying that it is enough for creating a doubt, and specially when judiciary is giving you so many chances.. ke abb dedo.. abb tou de hi do.. yaarf plzz dedo.. yaar kuchh tou dedo.. etc etc..

Anyway, I hope you are right.

BTW, even if there is a section of assets and liabilities, however it is not required to show the income from assets, it will definitely go in favor of NS.

In accounting as well, assets and liability statement is entirely separate report from income/ profit & loss statement.

Trial Court. No disqualification

Me too..

kam expect karain ge tou disqualification ki soorat main khushi ziada hogi, aur bach janay ki soorat main gham kam hoga..

 

[Emmie]

I have read somewhere that they are saying there was no separate place to declare this fact... But they submitted the visa.. which means NS declared his occupation and employer's name..

I mean I am just saying that it is enough for creating a doubt, and specially when judiciary is giving you so many chances.. ke abb dedo.. abb tou de hi do.. yaarf plzz dedo.. yaar kuchh tou dedo.. etc etc..

Anyway, I hope you are right.

Arguendo he declared his iqama, now did he declare benefit he would get? I mean did he declare those 10000 AED? And what would you make of undeclared bank accounts?

If NS manages to get away with all this then truly he's a son of a greater god and has every right to rule Pakistan and make mockery of judicial system.

Trial Court. No disqualification

Is formality ko bhi rehne he dena chehyay, kya khayal hy?

 

[PakSword]

what would you make of undeclared bank accounts?

Here I agree with you.. Undeclared bank account is a bigger threat for NS.. Thanks for reminding me..

Main confidence lose karchuka hun already.. Dawn Leaks ke episode ke baad..

 

[QatariPrince]

Is formality ko bhi rehne he dena chehyay, kya khayal hy?

Mera bas chalay tu sari family ko phansi per latka don

 

[Emmie]

BTW, even if there is a section of assets and liabilities, however it is not required to show the income from assets, it will definitely go in favor of NS.

In accounting as well, assets and liability statement is entirely separate report from income/ profit & loss statement.

I would recommend you to read two judgement of justice Umar Ata Bandial, I'll share if I get a soft copy.

 

[Areesh]

I would recommend you to read two judgement of justice Umar Ata Bandial, I'll share if I get a soft copy.

Sir jee yeh multiple ID chooha hai forum ka. Zara is k is account ko permanent ban to marna.

https://defence.pk/pdf/members/mountain-strike.185814/