What's new

Panama leak Case Proceedings - JIT Report, News, Updates And Discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.
Now I am hearing that she used earphones to get instructions.

She didn't, opposition was smacked by her confidence and speech and now coming up with conspiracy theories to explain what happened. New leader was born that day.
 
Pehlay wala verdict nahi tha naa.. only court order thaa.. 3 judges ki taraf se.. iss liey shayad..

Court order jo tha, .woh tu pooray bench ki taraf se court order tha...on behalf of the full bench.. Matlab Justice Khosa aur Gulzar bhi uss bench ka part thay..jis ne ye court order diya... They dissented but still they were part of tht court order.. Us par unke bhi sign honge... Tu us main jo directions theen..woh tu 5 member bench ne di theen.. Agar implementation bench main ye 3 judges na hotay.. Koi aur hi judges hotay.. CJ kisi bhi aur judges ko implementation bench ka part banaa detay...phir bhi ye JIT report 5 member bench ke pass hi wapis aati na?
 
So what is going? ...Is there anything new after qatari princessa's visit of JIT yesterday?
 
So JIT will be over in next 72 hours.

What's next? :undecided:

Likely that a case, based on the findings and proofs of JIT, will start in SC. The whole Shareef family will stand trial and will have to defend themselves.

The second scenario is that another NRO will be offered, Shareefs will accept it and will leave the country.
 
Likely that a case, based on the findings and proofs of JIT, will start in SC. The whole Shareef family will stand trial and will have to defend themselves.

The second scenario is that another NRO will be offered, Shareefs will accept it and will leave the country.

I think Shareef's will first malign judiciary, if they are able to succeed in creating enough controversy against JIT's report, they are ready to go into the elections with enough confidence.

If not, they will accept the offer of leaving the country very happily.

She didn't, opposition was smacked by her confidence and speech and now coming up with conspiracy theories to explain what happened. New leader was born that day.

کھوتوں کی نئی لیڈر کھوتی

Court order jo tha, .woh tu pooray bench ki taraf se court order tha...on behalf of the full bench.. Matlab Justice Khosa aur Gulzar bhi uss bench ka part thay..jis ne ye court order diya... They dissented but still they were part of tht court order.. Us par unke bhi sign honge... Tu us main jo directions theen..woh tu 5 member bench ne di theen.. Agar implementation bench main ye 3 judges na hotay.. Koi aur hi judges hotay.. CJ kisi bhi aur judges ko implementation bench ka part banaa detay...phir bhi ye JIT report 5 member bench ke pass hi wapis aati na?

Sachi baat hai, verdict kafi complex hai.. mujhay kuchh samajh nahi aarahi..
 
Sachi baat hai, verdict kafi complex hai.. mujhay kuchh samajh nahi aarahi..

Waqayi verdict kafi complex hai.. It should have been clear and unambiguous...

10th ko sab clear karein ge na....judges ....ke aagay kia hoga? Us waqt bhi suspense na chord ein ke jab verdict aaye tab hi pata chalay.. 10th ko judges ko clearly way forward bataana chahye..ke ab aagay kia hoga?
 
She didn't, opposition was smacked by her confidence and speech and now coming up with conspiracy theories to explain what happened. New leader was born that day.

A penned monologue full of arrogance & tantrums, aik minute, aik minute. Are we talking about a declamation contest? Aik adh question ly latien tau sari leadery umud ker samnay ajati, aise ratti ratai content-less speeches tau koi bhi ker sakta hy.
 
Waqayi verdict kafi complex hai.. It should have been clear and unambiguous...

10th ko sab clear karein ge na....judges ....ke aagay kia hoga? Us waqt bhi suspense na chord ein ke jab verdict aaye tab hi pata chalay.. 10th ko judges ko clearly way forward bataana chahye..ke ab aagay kia hoga?

In shaa Allah.. Ummeed tou hai hi.. Agar PMLN ne koi new harkat nahi kardi..
 
Some people are born confused and spread confusion but the verdict was clear in its technicalities:
  1. Five-judge full bench was created to listen the case
  2. Two out of five judges gave their verdict and found NS guilty of corruption and dishonesty
  3. Three out of five wanted further investigation before delivering their verdict
  4. Those three judges are part of the sub-bench that is overseeing the joint investigation team
  5. And only those judges have to deliver the judgement
  6. If anyone of the three says he found NS and his family guilty of the corruption and lying, NS will be disqualified and criminal proceedings will follow
  7. If all three of them find that NS did not lie and the money trail is satisfactory, he will be clean to run the govt and also run for next election etc

A penned monologue full of arrogance & tantrums, aik minute, aik minute. Are we talking about a declamation contest? Aik adh question ly latien tau sari leadery umud ker samnay ajati, aise ratti ratai content-less speeches tau koi bhi ker sakta hy.
Well, she is following her gutless father who is unable to speak without a piece of paper and written speeches by his hired journalists/novelists like Irfan Siddiqui, Najam Sethi etc etc.
 
Waqayi verdict kafi complex hai.. It should have been clear and unambiguous...

10th ko sab clear karein ge na....judges ....ke aagay kia hoga? Us waqt bhi suspense na chord ein ke jab verdict aaye tab hi pata chalay.. 10th ko judges ko clearly way forward bataana chahye..ke ab aagay kia hoga?

The judgement and the coupled Order is clear and absolutely unambiguous, the court's rules and procedures are not for us to understand. Please remember this case is part-heard, addition of any new judge will make the case afresh which would mean back to square one. CJ is there for a job to do, he decides benches.
 
Some people are born confused and spread confusion but the verdict was clear in its technicalities:
  1. Five-judge full bench was created to listen the case
  2. Two out of five judges gave their verdict and found NS guilty of corruption and dishonesty
  3. Three out of five wanted further investigation before delivering their verdict
  4. Those three judges are part of the sub-bench that is overseeing the joint investigation team
  5. And only those judges have to deliver the judgement
  6. If anyone of the three says he found NS and his family guilty of the corruption and lying, NS will be disqualified and criminal proceedings will follow
  7. If all three of them find that NS did not lie and the money trail is satisfactory, he will be clean to run the govt and also run for next election etc

The judgement and coupled Order is clear and absolutely unambiguous, the court's rules and procedures are not for us to understand. Please remember this case is part-heard, addition of any new judge will make the case afresh which would mean back to square one. CJ is there for a job to do, he decides benches.

Bhai Jan, we were discussing whether Justice Khosa and Gulzar will be able to add anything in their judgement.

By the way, Barrister Farogh Naseem, Aitzaz Ahsan and some others also say that this is the first time anything like this has happened, and it is not clear, but most probably the final verdict will be from 5 member bench, not the three member bench.

If barristers are not sure, how can we be sure.. Anyway, most likely (99% chance is), what War& Peace has mentioned above.
 
In shaa Allah.. Ummeed tou hai hi.. Agar PMLN ne koi new harkat nahi kardi..

PMLN aur harkat na kare, aisa tab hoga jab soraj maghrib se tallu hoga aur mashrik mein gharoob. Honestly speaking the majority judges are good at passing remarks and judgement but when it comes to the application of judicial mind they are taa'n taa'n thuss.
 
Some people are born confused and spread confusion but the verdict was clear in its technicalities:
  1. Five-judge full bench was created to listen the case
  2. Two out of five judges gave their verdict and found NS guilty of corruption and dishonesty
  3. Three out of five wanted further investigation before delivering their verdict
  4. Those three judges are part of the sub-bench that is overseeing the joint investigation team
  5. And only those judges have to deliver the judgement
  6. If anyone of the three says he found NS and his family guilty of the corruption and lying, NS will be disqualified and criminal proceedings will follow
  7. If all three of them find that NS did not lie and the money trail is satisfactory, he will be clean to run the govt and also run for next election etc

We are not talking abt whether one more judge reqd for disqualification or not? We know its a done case tht Justice Khosa and Gulzar's verdict will be counted for sure and only one more judge reqd... We were only discussing tht whether Justice Khosa and Gulzar can make some additions in their previous verdict..based on JIT report or not? This is the only thing we were discussing...So plzz read the entire context before responding
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom