Emmie
RETIRED MOD
- Joined
- Apr 23, 2011
- Messages
- 5,756
- Reaction score
- 8
- Country
- Location
Will another bench bhi constituted in this case??? I dont think so....
Judges had asked CJ to constitute monitoring/implementation bench....aur woh 3 member bench ban gaya....which has judges of majority verdict
Ab iske baad tu koi aur bench nahi banay gall, i think.. Ya tu JIt report is 3 member bench ke saamnay hi jayegi...ya phir..original 5 member bench ke pass... Sirf yeh decide hona hai ke un 2 judges ka vote count karay ga ya nahi? I dont think theres any question of any new bench being made, after implementation bench of 3 members... Ek hi new bench bannay ka kaha tha, CJ se aur woh ban gaya..
Ok.. Tell me...
Suppose one more judge disqualifies PM..then what will it mean? 3/5 judges disqualified PM...right? So it should mean his disqualification...
That's the prerogative of CJ, he'll decide which bench shall hear post-JIT case. If the same bench, the bench tasked to monitor JIT proceedings, continues to hear post-JIT case then to disqualify NS the judgement has to at least 2:1. Majority judges are there in monitoring bench because they didn't pass judgement in anyone's favor, ones who have passed the judgement on merits can't hear the case again unless the case is re-heard on review basis.
Justice Wajihuddin said..consider the verdict dated 20th april..as interim order..final verdict of which is yet to come.. Infact he was of the opinion at tht time( us waqt yeh implementation bench nahi bana tha) tht report of JIT will come back to the same 5 member bench and they will give final verdict again..
Uff bhtt confusion hai.. Kahin se pata karayein.. @PakSword aap bhi..koshish karein..
True as long as spirit of the judgement is deemed. The judgement passed on April 20th, enforceable and binding, is the judgement of the majority judges.