What's new

Panama leak Case Proceedings - JIT Report, News, Updates And Discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.
If you ask me number 3 and number 4 seems more plausible knowing the history of our courts and how culprits and criminals walk away on the basis of inconclusive evidence. We have heard far to many times that evidence provided is not conclusive but rather headings from news paper which will be latter used for selling pakros etc.

3 or 4?
 
Will like to reply to this from different perspectives;

If i was the judge,
my decision, in light of all the case hearings and proceedings thus far would have been the option# 1, disqualification under 62/63 and full criminal investigation to get the culprits to jail.

However since i am not the judge here and i guess all this is easier said than done, the other perspective will be that of the actual judges that are hearing the case. It will be best, for EVERYONE (Judges, law and the country) to go with option 2. Suspension for now and a detailed investigation into this matter that then results in disqualification and punishment.

Another option, that will mean plenty of cover for the judges and still deliver some little justice can be point 3. Also this will be sort of decision that i have been anticipating since day one (leaving aside the few days where i was more optimistic). This decision will be claimed as a victory by both sides.

Option 4 and 5, i do not see that happening and will come as a huge surprise and an even bigger disappointment is that is the case. Also remember that with whole world watching, that will be devastating for our international image as well and we will be butt of all jokes

So to summarize, my answer to this question is:
  • Option 1 is what i think is appropriate HOWEVER
  • Option 2 or Option 3 is what i will say is the most likely outcome. \

This is interesting!
@WAJsal @The Eagle @IceCold @HRK what do you people think? :)

Supreme Court Hearing: Ruling elite VS Pakistan.
May Pakistan Win!!
 
Refer to my post above. Although i chose 2 options as well. If i have to pick one and to my utter disgust it would be option 4. And I pray to God that i am proven wrong.

You have chosen too many.. Choose only one please.. :)
 
I dont think 4 or 5 are possible at all....... But if we see number 3, its not tht bad... Declaration on 62/63 will mean, pakki disqualification, esp if SC asks petitioner refer it to EC..plus criminal proceedings...
 
Number 2..

@Farah Sohail : 3 - PM is neither suspended nor disqualified, but is declared dishonest. A criminal investigation of money laundering is transferred to a commission with all the powers of NAB/ FBR/ FIA. Petitioner is asked to contact EC for disqualification.

@User : 5 - PM is acquitted on the basis of not enough conclusive evidence.

@PakSword : 2 - PM is suspended, and criminal investigation of money laundering is transferred to a commission with all the powers of NAB/ FBR/ FIA. No mention of 62 and 63, or no declaration.

Anyone else?

PM ko suspend kiya jai ga kiyo k wo apnay haq main koi saboot nai de sakay yehi aik reason ho sakti hai jis ki waja sai court k faislay ko 20 saal k bad bhi yad rakha or future main is ki misal di jai gi k jab tak ap be gunah sabbit nahi ho jatay ap ko koi post nahi mil sakti.


Hudabia case ko reopen kiya jaye ga.


NAB chairman ki chutti ho gi ya usay supreme judicial council main bheja jai ga.
 
Option 2 or 3? :) You must chose only one....

@IceCold What's your opinion?

and @Imad.Khan

and @The Eagle

In my personal opinion, just for the sake of the game here,,,,

2 - PM is suspended, and criminal investigation of money laundering is transferred to a commission with all the powers of NAB/ FBR/ FIA. No mention of 62 and 63, or no declaration.

3 - PM is neither suspended nor disqualified, but is declared dishonest. A criminal investigation of money laundering is transferred to a commission with all the powers of NAB/ FBR/ FIA. Petitioner is asked to contact EC for disqualification.


Though 1 could be like out of blue moon.
 
Option 2 or 3? :) You must chose only one....

@IceCold What's your opinion?

and @Imad.Khan

and @The Eagle
hmmmm, OK i will go with Option 2 then (but Option 3 ke booti bn ka pas rakon ga as, again, this too is quite likely) :P
But i feel more happy with Option 2, yeh zada ACHI lagti ha so going with it. (no need to listen to you mind all the time) :P
 
Maybe the Judges are indecisive and haven't reached any verdict.
 
Supreme Court Hearing: Ruling elite VS Pakistan.
May Pakistan Win!!
Yup, that is what i have been using as Signature these days and it is what my heart wishes for!!

You have chosen too many.. Choose only one please.. :)
Nop he did said that if he is to choose just one then to his dismay he will have to choose Opt# 4.

In my personal opinion, just for the sake of the game here,,,,

2 - PM is suspended, and criminal investigation of money laundering is transferred to a commission with all the powers of NAB/ FBR/ FIA. No mention of 62 and 63, or no declaration.

3 - PM is neither suspended nor disqualified, but is declared dishonest. A criminal investigation of money laundering is transferred to a commission with all the powers of NAB/ FBR/ FIA. Petitioner is asked to contact EC for disqualification.


Though 1 could be like out of blue moon.
Bahi MOD hony ka yeh matlab ni ka you get to choose two options!! :lol:

Sb aik aik choose kr rahy haan,, chlo shahbash,, TELL ONE!! :cheesy:
 
hmmmm, OK i will go with Option 2 then (but Option 3 ke booti bn ka pas rakon ga as, again, this too is quite likely) :P
But i feel more happy with Option 2, yeh zada ACHI lagti ha so going with it. (no need to listen to you mind all the time) :P
True!!
But UNFORTUNATELY as per @PakSword we only get to choose ONE option. :( I am going with opt 2 therefore even though i feel 3 is more likely. Tora dil kay itmenan ka lea, so i will go with Opt# 2.

Else i have described in detail how i see this case, it can go anywhere really.

Optin 3 isnt bad either... Because it will mean disqualification for PM, esp if Sc gives declaration on 62/63 and asks petitioner to refer it to EC, plus criminal proceedings... Disqualification through EC, will be for 10 yrs, i think..so its a pretty reasonable option too...and in this way, disqualification will br pakki.. Warna agar, option 2 main sirf suspension hui, aur baad main pata chala ke criminal proceedings main kuch nahi nikla...phir? Dobara Nawaz sharif bahal hogaya..phir?
 
Optin 3 isnt bad either... Because it will mean disqualification for PM, esp if Sc gives declaration on 62/63 and asks petitioner to refer it to EC, plus criminal proceedings... Disqualification through EC, will be for 10 yrs, i think..so its a pretty reasonable option too...and in this way, disqualification will br pakki.. Warna agar, option 2 main sirf suspension hui, aur baad main pata chala ke criminal proceedings main kuch nahi nikla...phir? Dobara Nawaz sharif bahal hogaya..phir?
Tuu kya hua agr bahal ho b gya tu!!

Kya begara ha ap ka bychary na!!

Acha ha na, ab is umer mein kahan nokro dhondy ga new!
 
Refer to my post above. Although i chose 2 options as well. If i have to pick one and to my utter disgust it would be option 4. And I pray to God that i am proven wrong.

Man you have scared me..

Supreme Court Hearing: Ruling elite VS Pakistan.
May Pakistan Win!!

Your option please? Please refer to post # 3536

PM ko suspend kiya jai ga kiyo k wo apnay haq main koi saboot nai de sakay yehi aik reason ho sakti hai jis ki waja sai court k faislay ko 20 saal k bad bhi yad rakha or future main is ki misal di jai gi k jab tak ap be gunah sabbit nahi ho jatay ap ko koi post nahi mil sakti.


Hudabia case ko reopen kiya jaye ga.


NAB chairman ki chutti ho gi ya usay supreme judicial council main bheja jai ga.

So option 2?
 
Tuu kya hua agr bahal ho b gya tu!!

Kya begara ha ap ka bychary na!!

Acha ha na, ab is umer mein kahan nokro dhondy ga new!

:rolleyes: Aap ko bhtt hamdardi horahi hai? :rolleyes: Mujhe tu aap ke iraaday lag rahay hain..us party ko join karnay ke :rolleyes:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom