What's new

Panama leak Case Proceedings - JIT Report, News, Updates And Discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.
miki tay ay staged lagni ......... polcay hasnay pay picha
Miki wi aye lagna par hasa fir wi dil garden garden horiyaey :D

Naeem Bukhari accidentally said there's details of business of shareef's in india in VOL 10 & quickly covered it :D
Kaka ab to article 6 ka darwaza khul gaya :D
 
I was watching Off the Record on ARY. Kashif asked S.M Zafar about how long is NS disqualified.
He is saying that NS is disqualified only for this current Parliment and he can continue his political career in the next election. He can file a review or go to EC to clear it ....WT? o_O
@Farah Sohail @PakSword @The Accountant and all others

somebody in the background said "why are you showing him a way out".... his wife probably :blink:
He is disqualified for life
 
So mootttu gang is disqualified or not???
Who is going to take charge now???
 
DF1WockXYAEnDiU.jpg:large


:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:
SHetan apko lanat bhejney sey rokey ga :D
 
FROM PAKISTAN TO PARK LANE VIA PANAMA – HOW PRIME MINISTER SHARIF’S FAMILY USED ANONYMOUS COMPANIES

Naomi Hirst Tweet Share Corruption & Money Laundering Governments DONATE
GPPX11_2.width-800.jpg


Over a year on and the effect of the Panama Papers continues to reverberate.

Today the leaks claimed another political scalp: Pakistan’s Supreme Court has removed Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif from office. The leaks showed how Sharif and his children were linked to prestigious Park Lane apartments through a complex web of anonymously owned British Virgin Island (BVI) companies.





The Sharif family have denied any wrongdoing. And currently, there is nothing at all illegal about owning UK properties through anonymous companies either in Pakistan or in the UK.

And that is precisely the problem.



Our investigations have shown time and again how easy it is for the criminal and corrupt to launder money through luxury property, hiding the real owners behind anonymous companies, often registered in secrecy jurisdictions like the BVI and hidden behind “nominee” directors.



We urgently need to close this loophole. And until recently, we thought the UK was making progress.



But two years after David Cameron promised to bring transparency to the UK property market and just one year after the furore of the Panama Papers and the commitments made at the International Anti-Corruption Summit, we are no closer to stopping the corrupt from investing their ill-gotten gains in UK properties.

The decision rests with the Prime Minister and her Cabinet. Are they happy to see criminal proceeds stashed in UK properties? Is this the kind of global Britain we’ll be after Brexit?



If not, they need make good on their promise to clean up the UK property market and show the world that ‘there is no home for the corrupt in Britain’ by putting legislation before Parliament as soon as possible.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom