What's new

Panama leak Case Proceedings - JIT Report, News, Updates And Discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.
You wasted your time by implying that scrap material (provided as evidence for buying London flats) has $28,000 FOB.

Only a genius of your calibre would buy that argument or maybe Salman Akram Raja will buy - next time you meet someone from MC please advise to not only check fonts but spellings of Notary too - it has letter "a" in it too.

This is a sincere advice - no pun intention! Stay blessed!
Lol. I didn't implied :) It's mentioned in the shipment document you posted earlier :D. Instead of accepting that you wrongly quoted value of shipment as worth of scrap, you shifted towards some irrelevant stuff font, notary etc

Secondly, I am not buying any of the arguments of NS or JIT. I am just discussing about the credibility of JIT findings.
 
Initially SC can decide on their own if these new documents can be considered admissible evidence under the law, if they consider it admissible than comes the matter of verification.

To me this hearing is appearing to be a sham more and more..there was no sense or reasonable clause by any standards whatsoever in opening the doors for more documents after the report of JIT was submitted, this was supposed to be a hearing centred entirely on JIT findings, the time for presenting evidence was over..... I am now 80% sure these judges dont have their hearts in right places, they are giving uncalled for opportunities to shareefs to drag and mess up this case, the 20% part of me that still remains positive is that child which remains inside all of us hoping against hope.

All things point to the fact that SC is going to refer this case to trail court without disqualification (meaning shareef got away with it ), i sincerely hope i am wrong.

Pata nahi,,,,mujhe lagta hai ke ....disqualification InshaAllah hogi, zuroor.. Bas sab musalley par beth jayein aur duaaein minnatein, karein ke woh baat theek niklay ke Justice Khosa aur Gulzar bhi apnay previous verdict main additions karsakein.. Phir tu double mazay
 
Pata nahi,,,,mujhe lagta hai ke ....disqualification InshaAllah hogi, zuroor.. Bas sab musalley par beth jayein aur duaaein minnatein, karein ke woh baat theek niklay ke Justice Khosa aur Gulzar bhi apnay previous verdict main additions karsakein.. Phir tu double mazay
Lets see:-)
 
Seriously if these are the types of evidence that $harifs are submitting where Maryam is spelled as Mariam and grammar ka haal subhanallah.

The first full stop comes at the end of first paragraph.

If I were in the bench I would have disqualified PM not because of forgery but the despicable level of forgery.

Koi standard hota hai - corruption billions ki aur shopping ke liye sale of Harrids - Banda koi Bond Street ya Dover Street London jaye.

Someone very close to $harif's always ays- "he can live in Mayfair, but he can't get lohar out of himself"

IMG_0570.JPG
 
Nothing like this will happen.. JIT ka kaam khatam hochuka.. Abb SC ya Trial Court..

Aaj ya kal...Justice Ijazul Ahsan ne kaha ke..ye ek trend lag raha hai ke ye sab respondents ki strategy lag rahi hai ke JIT ko kuch nahi dena...aur ab selectively parts main sab keh rahay hian ke humaray pass record hai.. Unke kehnay ka matlab ye tha, ke agar JIT main docs de detay tu phir cross questioning hosakti ya authentication hosakti...tu strategy thee ke zjit ko kuch nahi dena...

Ab agar judges ki ye soch hai ke inhon ne JIT main is liye docs nahi diye ke authenticate na hojayein.....tu hosakta hai ke ab bhi judges JIT ko keh dein ke humein 1 week main forensic firm se opinion le kar dein..
 
Aaj ya kal...Justice Ijazul Ahsan ne kaha ke..ye ek trend lag raha hai ke ye sab respondents ki strategy lag rahi hai ke JIT ko kuch nahi dena...aur ab selectively parts main sab keh rahay hian ke humaray pass record hai.. Unke kehnay ka matlab ye tha, ke agar JIT main docs de detay tu phir cross questioning hosakti ya authentication hosakti...tu strategy thee ke zjit ko kuch nahi dena...

Ab agar judges ki ye soch hai ke inhon ne JIT main is liye docs nahi diye ke authenticate na hojayein.....tu hosakta hai ke ab bhi judges JIT ko keh dein ke humein 1 week main forensic firm se opinion le kar dein..

Nahi, this will require another interim order.. SC will not do it.

Yeh trial court ka kaam hota hai.. docs ki verification karwana..
 
This is a very complex case and it has many facets.

Judges, in their remarks, are trying to cover all the aspects.

I think this will go to the trial court but:
  1. After the disqualification of NS.
  2. Removal and may be arrest of $Dar
  3. Some barring of Maryam Nawaz from holding any "Office".
There are ample reasons and proofs in front of SC to do this.

Any muk-muka is out of question. This will be equivalent to undermining JIT, who worked tirelessly on the orders of SC.

IK has already undermined the muk-muka by disclosing that he was offered 10-B rupees. If he gets any sniff of muk-muka, he will start the 10-B story again.
 
Yaha log spellings mistake ko expose kr rhe hain lekin kisi ke yebaat idhr smjh ni ari ke SC court ko apni hee bnai hui JIT ke officially attested doc of dubai govts ke nzr ni arhe to wo spelling pe kia dhyaan denge .
 
This is a very complex case and it has many facets.

Judges, in their remarks, are trying to cover all the aspects.

I think this will go to the trial court but:
  1. After the disqualification of NS.
  2. Removal and may be arrest of $Dar
  3. Some barring of Maryam Nawaz from holding any "Office".
There are ample reasons and proofs in front of SC to do this.

Any muk-muka is out of question. This will be equivalent to undermining JIT, who worked tirelessly on the orders of SC.

IK has already undermined the muk-muka by disclosing that he was offered 10-B rupees. If he gets any sniff of muk-muka, he will start the 10-B story again.

Allah aap ki zuban mubarak karay bhai jan!
 
Nahi, this will require another interim order.. SC will not do it.

Yeh trial court ka kaam hota hai.. docs ki verification karwana..

JIT se jo chaahay kaam kara saktay hain... Agar JIT extension bhi maangti tu yehi bench extension de sakta tha... Woh inhon ne pehle hi din keh diya tha ke hum nahi dein ge...lekin de saktay thay...
Is bench ke pass 187 aur 190 ke under koi bhi order de saktay hain..tu ye masla nahi hai..

trial court wali argument..main wazan hai.. Lekin hum tu disqualification ke angle se bhi dekh rahay hain ke itnay undisputed docs honay chahyein ke disqualification pakki ho.. Tu judges har cheez ko authenticate na karna chahein ..?
 
Seriously if these are the types of evidence that $harifs are submitting where Maryam is spelled as Mariam and grammar ka haal subhanallah.

The first full stop comes at the end of first paragraph.

If I were in the bench I would have disqualified PM not because of forgery but the despicable level of forgery.

Koi standard hota hai - corruption billions ki aur shopping ke liye sale of Harrids - Banda koi Bond Street ya Dover Street London jaye.

Someone very close to $harif's always ays- "he can live in Mayfair, but he can't get lohar out of himself"

View attachment 412613
forgery pindi ka ai munshi apnh type writer per er e deta hy...... fees 500 rupees,
NEW EVIDENCE FROM DUBAI, ENGLAND, AND QATAR....
type.jpg
:rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl::rofl:
 
Nahi, this will require another interim order.. SC will not do it.

Yeh trial court ka kaam hota hai.. docs ki verification karwana..

Aap Justice Ijazul Ahsan ke unn remarks ko kaisy dekhtay hian jo unhon ne kaha ke sab ki strategy ye thee ke JIT ko kuch nahi dena..aur ab sab keh rahay hian ke humaray pass record hai.. JIT main kiun nahi diya? Is se aap ko kia lag raha hai? Wo h yehi kehna chah rahay thay ke cross questioning aur authentication of docs se bachnay ke liye JIT ko nahi diya...tu ab unke kia iraaday lagtay hain?
 
JIT se jo chaahay kaam kara saktay hain... Agar JIT extension bhi maangti tu yehi bench extension de sakta tha... Woh inhon ne pehle hi din keh diya tha ke hum nahi dein ge...lekin de saktay thay...
Is bench ke pass 187 aur 190 ke under koi bhi order de saktay hain..tu ye masla nahi hai..

trial court wali argument..main wazan hai.. Lekin hum tu disqualification ke angle se bhi dekh rahay hain ke itnay undisputed docs honay chahyein ke disqualification pakki ho.. Tu judges har cheez ko authenticate na karna chahein ..?

Judges ke paas DQ karnay ka ground Feb main bhi mojud tha....

JIT ke baaray main order pass kia tha monitoring bench ne, ke JIT abb khatam hochuki aur JIT apna samaan wapis uthalay.. JIT ne itna material provide kardia hai DQ ke liey, ke koi moqa dena banta hi nahi hai..

Judges ne sirf 2-3 sawalat karnay thay Shareefs ke lawyers se.. bass. lekin yeh moqay pe moqa diey ja rahay hain..

Seedha seedha perjury main andar karo inn ko.. yeh kia ke aap money trail ladain.. abhi tak nahi laey.. abb tou ladain.. please ladain.. hum aap ke paun partay hain.. please. for God's sake...

Aap Justice Ijazul Ahsan ke unn remarks ko kaisy dekhtay hian jo unhon ne kaha ke sab ki strategy ye thee ke JIT ko kuch nahi dena..aur ab sab keh rahay hian ke humaray pass record hai.. JIT main kiun nahi diya? Is se aap ko kia lag raha hai? Wo h yehi kehna chah rahay thay ke cross questioning aur authentication of docs se bachnay ke liye JIT ko nahi diya...tu ab unke kia iraaday lagtay hain?

Mujhay trial court nazar aarahi hai..

Remarks pe ziada na jaieyga.. yeh judges uss bench main iss se ziada khatarnaak remarks dete thay..

Agar Aisa hua to phir dinner aap ki taraf sey :p: :enjoy:

You know, I decided to visit UK this month using my Qatar Airways miles, but Qatar Airways ke upar pabandi lag gaee.. UAE se fly nahi karsakti.. lolz..
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom