What's new

Panama leak Case Proceedings - JIT Report, News, Updates And Discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.
Strange the address in $harif's letter is a house, whose application for change of use from residential to commercial has been rejected and only application that was allowed was to change the status to Day Nursery - is the nursery that Hassan and Hussain were admitted to in 1988 ;)

Still it is the address of Dillon Law LLC as per today's search records. Seems quite dubious that representative firm of Millions of Pounds is in a part time office.

Bromley Properyu Report 1.png
Bromley Properyu Report 2.png
 
Last edited:
Rauf Klasara in his show

SC should give JIT members hour or two for their remarks on this game changing new documents they're providing.

I so agree with it.

The documents provided by Ishaq Dar given by Qatari prince, the signatures are misspelled of whoever this person Nayahan is. Rauf Kalsara explaining in his show.

Makes sense.
 
Arshad Sharif: The JPCA letter is also old. Only coloured version being presented now! Part of 432/2107 AnnexN/1

DFHVAHuXgAA5Zd7.jpg:large
 
Arshad Sharif: The JPCA letter is also old. Only coloured version being presented now! Part of 432/2107 AnnexN/1

DFHVAHuXgAA5Zd7.jpg:large
It's already reported that these documents are not new. However, the documents related to Cargo Shipment are new ones. These old documents were presented to JIT but instead of verifying these documents, JIT just presented their own documents (unattested and from private sources).
 
It's already reported that these documents are not new. However, the documents related to Cargo Shipment are new ones. These old documents were presented to JIT but instead of verifying these documents, JIT just presented their own documents (unattested and from private sources).

Do you have a copy of the documents related to the cargo shipment? In any case, none of these documents are an answer to the fundamental question of the money trail to the London apartments.
 
Kon say documents a gaye?

Yea tu kheench lya inhoon nay case agay!

Ab trial court main hi jaye ga

DFHDA9CXsAAbfOz.jpg:large

DFHDA9CWAAAwJiX.jpg:large

DFHDA9FXoAQTelb.jpg:large

DFHGxqgVoAA4cL5.jpg:large

Yeh January aur February 2017 ke letters hian.. Koi inn se poochay ke tab tu Justice Khosa walay bench ki hearing abhi chal rahi thee..tab kiun nahi diye ye letters? Doosri baat yeh ke 2014 ka zikr karrahay hain meeting ka.. JIT already keh chuki hai ke unhein maryam nawaz ki beneficial ownership ka 2012 tak ka pata hai.. After 2012, they are not sure..ke ab kon hai? Aur yahan bhi yeh 2014 ka agar zikr hai bhi, tu ...JIT ka stance phir bhi theek hai
 
Pro Govt channels are projecting these letters as new and game changing! :sick:
 
It's already reported that these documents are not new. However, the documents related to Cargo Shipment are new ones. These old documents were presented to JIT but instead of verifying these documents, JIT just presented their own documents (unattested and from private sources).

Do you have a copy of the documents related to the cargo shipment? In any case, none of these documents are an answer to the fundamental question of the money trail to the London apartments.

So multimillion $ Steel Mill was built with scrap worth of AED 102,333 with Freight charges of US$12,000.

Quite an achievement :)

IMG_0544.JPG
IMG_0545.JPG
IMG_0546.JPG


Deal has been reached. I wonder how much money has changed hands.

That I never discount!

ALWAYS a POSSIBILITY whenever the name $harif is involved.
 
In all this dramatization real issue has gotten sideline. Main issue is article 62 &63 is not appropriately pursued, rather everyone is after TRUCK KI BATI
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom