What's new

Panama leak Case Proceedings - JIT Report, News, Updates And Discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.
I think iss 3 member bench ki ehmiat Judicial Commission jaisi hai.. jis ko JIT ka taawun hasil ho..

Hmm... Aap ki..is baat main kuch wazan nazar aaraha hai...judicial commission wali..

Lekin judicial commission agar apni findings kisi diff bench ke saamnay rakhta hai..tu us par phir hearing hoti hai... Ab agar 5 member bench ke pass wapis jaata hai tu phir hearing kis cheez par dobara hogi? Yehi implementation bench dono sides ko sunn rahi hai..NAB, FIA ko bhi sunay gi, Attorner gen ko bhi sunay gi..phir 5 member bench kis cheez ki hearing karay gi?

Ye judicial commission wali baat tab ziada theek na lagti..agar jaisy hi JIT report aayi thee..ye implementation bench dissolve hojata...aur 5 member bench ko refer kar deta ye case aur phir hearing start hoti dono sides ki?

Aur court order min ye bhi likha tha ke implementtion bench periodic ya final JIT report par...disqualification ka matter dekhay gi..matlab us ne hi verdict dena tha..implementation bench ne?
 
.
Wallah it's being better than being his fan. :D

Is ke bete ko fever bhi ho to kehta Qaymat ke nishani :D
Aisa na Kahn ... He is one of us ... Only tv anchor Jo hath dho kr is tabur k pechy para ha including IK k pass jo corrupt loog jama ho rhy with umeed k Bach jaun gy ...

Thori bht chawlien tu her koi hi Marta ha Dr dhabardos ki bhi kuch chawlien berdasht krni perti han
 
.
Agar kisi ghareeb ke bachay ne chori ki hoti to ab tak baghair JIT bananay ki takalluf ke usko saza ho chuki hoti. Yeh judges kab tak money trail ki bheek mangtay rahein ge. Sari dunia ko samajh aa gai hai ke unke pass money trail nahi hai bus in judges ko nahi ayi. Justice delayed is justice denied. NS has almost completed his tenure and this was his last tenure anyway so whats the point.
 
.
Dr Dhabardoos ki baaton par yaqeen na kiya karein.. Jis din se inhon ne JIT members par ilzaam lagaya tha, uske baad se main ne inka program dekhna chor diya hai bilkol
Nahi next do unhon NY shaky chupy lafzon mn tarded krdi this he said that interim report dwkh kr jazbati hogay thy
 
. .
A Dubai law firm has submitted a legal opinion to Pakistan's Supreme Court on Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif's alleged employment in Dubai, verifying that the employment documents which imply he was employed by Capital FZE in Jebel Ali Freezone (Jafza) in Dubai until 2014 are 100 per cent legal.

The legal firm Khalifa bin Huwaidan Advocates was consulted by the Joint Investigation Team (JIT) that has submitted a 254-page report to the Pakistan's Supreme Court into Nawaz' family wealth.

The court held its first hearing on Monday to decide the fate of the prime minister who is contesting the corruption investigation. He has denied any wrong doing.

The Dubai law firm submitted its report to the Supreme Court on Monday, Khalifa bin Huwaidan, lawyer and legal advisor at the firm, told Khaleej Times.

"Normally businessmen establish companies in Dubai if they want to maintain a visa status in the company but in this case, (Nawaz Sharif) was an employee in a Jafza-based firm," he confirmed.

Khalifa's conclusion was based on the copy of the labour contract Nawaz had with Capital FZE, and said "The contract is 100 per cent legal."

The legal opinion has been readied based on the UAE labour laws, he said. It earlier emerged that Nawaz Sharif was employed as chairman of the board for Capital FZE company in Jafza from August 2006 to April 2014 and was withdrawing a salary of Dh10,000. However, his employment status was terminated in 2014 after the company was dissolved. This was a year after he became the prime minister of Pakistan for the third time.

The Sharif family has denied that a salary was withdrawn and said that the visa was to facilitate visits to the UAE. However, as per the UAE Labour Law, all employees have to receive a salary through a bank account under the UAE's Wage Protection System (WPS), failing which the firm can be blacklisted and shut down.

Also as per the UAE law, if no record of a salary transfer to the bank is found, the employer is held liable not the employee. However, it is not clear who owned Capital FZE before it was dissolved.

Hussain Nawaz, son of Nawaz Sharif has rejected the JIT findings that his father was being paid by the Dubai firm. He said that his father never received any salary from the aforesaid company. Hussain said that his father was appointed as chairman only for facilitation of visa and visits to the UAE in 2006.

The JIT report has also revealed that Nawaz did not disclose this information before running for the highest public office in 2013 which is against the Constitution of Pakistan. The JIT findings are based on its correspondence with Jafza.

A legal opinion from a Dubai firm verifying the legality of the employment contract will leave no room for Nawaz to contest this in court.

This result is also likely to impact the case against the Sharifs, which are being probed after the Panama Papers revealed in 2016 that three of his children owned offshore companies and assets not shown on his family's wealth statement. The assets in question include four expensive flats in Park Lane, London.

asmaalizain@khaleejtimes.com
 
.
Nahi next do unhon NY shaky chupy lafzon mn tarded krdi this he said that interim report dwkh kr jazbati hogay thy

Interim report inn ke haath kaisay lagi thi? Jaisay Tariq Shafi ne 12 million Dirham Qatari ko diey thay isi tarah kisi ne interim report in ko di thi?
 
.
Lekin woh keh raha hai ne keh evidences tou record kar hi nahi sakti court? Tou yeh wala evidence kaisay record hoga khilaaf e qanoon jakey? Isi liey tou judges khud bhi sawal pooch rahay thay ke hum kis hadd tak jasaktay hain khud se, Naeem Bukhari ne unn ki ziada rehnumai nahi ki iss matter pe..

Sirf itna kaha ke jaisay pehlay 2 judges ne kia tha.. uss pe aik judge bolay ke hum qanoon ke mutabiq faisla deingay..

Nahi.. Ye baat nahi hai.. SC ke pass agar undisputed facts aajayein..phir woh koi bhi decision de sakti hai.... Pehle ye masla tha ke 3 judges ne kaha tha ke humaray pass undisputed facts nahi hain..ke hum uski basis par faisla de sakein.. They neded more investigation.. 2 judges ne kaha tha ke in our opinion ..we have enough undisputed facts jis ki basis par hum declare karsakein ke NS is not sadiq aur ameen.

. SC is se pehle bhi logon ko disqualify karchuki hai, khud se.

.on 62/63.. 184/3 ki jurisdiction aur 62/63 par Justice Ijazul Ahsan ki wohi opinion hai, jo Justice Khosa ki.. Aaj unhien FZE company wala undisputed fact mil gaya hai jis par woh disqualify karsaktay hai
 
.
Actually there is a boundary of the SC, which is the constitution.

SC has come into existence as a result of the constitution. This is why that when there is a martial law, the SC goes into abeyance (because the constitution goes into abeyance).

Furthermore, SC can interpret the constitution but cannot give any decision outside it (for example, SC cannot give punishment of death by stoning or burning because it is not in constitution).

Obviously everything is subject to the constitution, I thought it was well understand between people. I never said SC had a boundary beyond constitution. My post had a context which you seem to have missed. Anyway if I take your argument valid then the judgement passed by two minority judges is void, unconstitutional, ultra vires and two judges should be tried for declaring something unconstitutional.

Sir it was about article 184(3) which was to be read with article 187.

Furthermore, SC can interpret the constitution but cannot give any decision outside it (for example, SC cannot give punishment of death by stoning or burning because it is not in constitution).

For the sake of a post --- SC does not punish people, it either upholds or quashes a punishment. SC constitutionally does not entertain trials.

Kidding, have fun and good night.
 
.
Dr shahid massood is right .. where are those contempt of court procedings? Agaisnt jew , jzbat rafiq, krimani????

Justice delayed is justice denied..

If it has been proved that NS n tabbar is corrupt ..which has been proved by none other than the SC appointed JIt ...then y giving remarks abt sending it to trial court....
 
.
Nahi.. Ye baat nahi hai.. SC ke pass agar undisputed facts aajayein..phir woh koi bhi decision de sakti hai.... Pehle ye masla tha ke 3 judges ne kaha tha ke humaray pass undisputed facts nahi hain..ke hum uski basis par faisla de sakein.. They neded more investigation.. 2 judges ne kaha tha ke in our opinion ..we have enough undisputed facts jis ki basis par hum declare karsakein ke NS is not sadiq aur ameen.

. SC is se pehle bhi logon ko disqualify karchuki hai, khud se.

.on 62/63.. 184/3 ki jurisdiction aur 62/63 par Justice Ijazul Ahsan ki wohi opinion hai, jo Justice Khosa ki.. Aaj unhien FZE company wala undisputed fact mil gaya hai jis par woh disqualify karsaktay hai

Kisi bhi evidence ko disputed bananey ke liey defendant ko challenge karna parta hai.. agar aap keh rahi hain ke undisputed aagaey hain tou iss ka matlab Kh. Haris didn't challenge the legality of any evidence?

Sorry main ne aaj ki hearing ziada nahi dekhi? Lekin mere khayal main tou woh poori JIT ko hi disputed bana rahay hain... abhi evidences pe tou aaye hi nahi...

Farz karain, kal SC kehti hai, ke JIT pe aitraz mustarid kartay hain, aagay chalain, aur uss ke baad kh. haris documents ko challenge karna shuru kardeta hai one by one.. phir kia hoga?
 
. .
Nahi next do unhon NY shaky chupy lafzon mn tarded krdi this he said that interim report dwkh kr jazbati hogay thy

Unka recently yehi pattern ban gaya hai.. Pehle ek conspiracy theory laatay hian ke woh bik gaya..woh bhi bik gaya,,baad main dhaky chupay alfaz main tardeed kar ke..tareefein shuru kardetey hain..unhi logon ki.. Ye ek dafa nahi..ab har dafa hota hai..

20th april ke verdict ke baad main ne khud programs dekhay thay.. Ek week tal dr dhabardoos kehtay rahay ke jo verdict aana tha..woh verdict reserve honay k baad ..announce honay tak..dhabardoos hochuka hai.. Ye 1 dafa nahi...1 week tak kehtay rahay..aur CJ se roz suo moti lenay ka kehtay thay.. Pakora judge ki bemari par bhi kaha tha ke hospital main kon log milnay aaye...dekha jaye tu bhtt cheezein khulein gi..

Baad main...implementation bench ki hearing ke dauran kehnay lagay ke humari judiciary zabardast hain.. Judges bilkol theek track par chal rahay hain..bilkol fair andaz main..zabardast judges hain ye...

Phir JIT members par ilzaam laganay lagay ke bik gaye.. Mujhe us waqt bhi yaqeen tah ke kuch din baad inki tareef hi na karrahay hon.. Unhein ab maza aanay laga hai conpircy theories aur sensation spreead karnay main.. Phir kuch din baad uturn le letay hain
 
. .
. SC is se pehle bhi logon ko disqualify karchuki hai, khud se.

Yeh cheez.. judges yehi sunna chah rahay hain.. ke koi theek thaak references de de inhain.. inhon ne Attorney General ko bhi isi liey bulwaya tha.. but attorney general kisi aur ka attorney nikal..

Hahah! What's wrong with him? He's implying a deal has been struck.

I think he doesn't break any news, he just does analysis on the basis of different reports/ news items that come to his attention in the part 3-4 days...
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom