Pakistan’s Tactical Nuclear Weapons Should Terrify You

[Ultima Thule]

Go read man...

Where you moron

 

[The BrOkEn HeArT]

Indian attack on Pakistan will be a suicide mission for India in itself. lolll

That's why even Modi couldn't do anything post 27th Feb humiliation. He was considered a champion of Indian bhakts who always thought he would teach a lesson to Pakistan but he didn't do anything after getting a bloody nose.. and he knows why... he can't go on a suicide mission.

Pakistan was ready.. responded in broad daylight.. take a revenge of our 15 trees and a crow by destroying 2 jets, and making Indians to shoot down their own heli with 4 soldiers and two officers on board..

When the world was showing the blows Pakistan inflicted on Indians, Indians were measuring the holes on the roof of buildings to prove that they hit something for which they got the bloody nose..

This is like someone saying "He slapped me because I also tried to slap him"..

If Indian leadership had even tiny courage, they would have wrecked havoc in Pakistan.. but they know IT WILL BE A SUICIDE MISSION FOR INDIA..

Thanks for the delusional post. Lolz
BTW Modi is still a champion. We Indians don't care or believe in Pakistan's delusional propaganda.
Why to waste bullets when we can demage you without firing it.
If 27th feb was a successful day then 370 act would never be happened.
27th Feb was just a test of Pakistani capabilities. You were failed in it. Thats why Modi didn't waste time annexing Kashmir through 370.

 

[maverick1977]

Tactical nukes use small missile with low range and hence difficult to intercept. But that doesn't mean tens of thousands of Indian soldiers will be killed. TNW is not strong enough to kill soldiers in that quantity unless Indian soldiers are stupid and stand in a single location. Generally, soldiers spread out to have higher land control. So, you can't kill tens of thousands of soldiers unless you use dozens of nukes. But if you use 10 nukes for 10000 soldiers, then you are only killing 1000 per nuke which is quite small.


Nukes are.not magic weapons that war can be won by nukes. If nukes were enough to win war, why develop 5th generation planes, radars, navy etc? Think logically instead of saying that merely nuke strike will kill everyone from other side. No, India will not go back to 1900 o even 1950s due to nuke strike. India has enough industrial capability and infrastructure to withstand attacks amd still maintain production. In war, every country will be willing to lose people. India too will be willing to lose 3-4 crore people to gain permanent solution.


India is not ready as it knows it can get stronger. India van develop more technology like BMD and defend against most Pakistani missiles, thus minimising losses. Pakistan knows that it can never develop advanced technology fast enough to counter India. So, the more delay happens, Pakistan will face even greater technology odds. So, Pakistan is just desperate while India is buying time. Nevertheless, it doesn't mean India can't defeat Pakistan now. It is just that India can defeat Pakistan tomorrow with much less losses.


India will not lose 90% population. Japan didn't lose half its people because of nuclear diseases or wasteland. In fact, there is no evidence to say that Japanese suffered from nuclear diseases over time. Only those who were hit on the day of explosion were the ones who suffered.

West is irrelevant. They won't involve themselves beyond a point. So, it will come down to the strength of India and Pakistan and allies. No big country like China, Russia or USA would like to get its people killed in someone else's war.

Second strike is absurd theory. Nukes are mated on missiles and stored underground or beneath mountains which van be killed by first strike. Nucleae submarine ia mainly for striking long range Targets as im case of USSR - USA which lie half the world away and hence the conventional ballistic missiles can't be accurate while navigating earth's curvature. Hence submarines were brought in to launch the missiles from closer to enemy shores. Nuke missile is nit stored in open ground for someone to strike at it.


Nuclear strike, whether first or second, can only cause so much damage. War can be won only by long term sustained campaign. One shot kills are only fantasy. No, India doesn't think that it can kill Pakistan with some nuclear strikes but that India will destroy Pakistan and wipe out its people through sustained campaign due to superior technology and industrial capabilities.


Skirmishes doesn't mean anything. Moreover, Abhinandan was using Mig21 which is very old.


India has 30 lakh square kilometres of land, can you give me calculations as to how you can destroy so much land by nuclear strikes? How many nuclear strikes will you do?

India is waiting to destroy Pakistan. But middle east oil powers are stopping it. If India gets an excuse to attack, why would it let go?

No, it is because the land mass ia very large and hence if we calculate the destructive power of nukes, we will need a lot of them to take out all enemy bases.

Lol! India crossed into Pakistan and bombed Balakot. India didn't hesitate when it had an objective. It doesn't mean India will invade Pakistan arbitrarily

Show me where anyone has said that Pakistan has thermonuclear weapons? Many have said that Pakistan plans to develop it but never that Pakistan has already developed them.


USA does not have land bases to maintain Afghanistan. So, it was compelled to make peace as it started losing support from middle east and Pakistan. Middle East and Pakistan have shifted their support to China instead of USA and hence USA withdrew.

Manohar Parrikar had already said this in 2015-16. You are simply joining unconnected dots

strange analysis... first there is an assembly area for troops before attack, learn something in life...
thats where tactical nukes will be used to give your soldiers a male version of sathi ... straight to their respective gods ....

i reckon the day when the terrorist army will be dispatched to heavens

 

[PakSword]

Thanks for the delusional post. Lolz
BTW Modi is still a champion. We Indians don't care or believe in Pakistan's delusional propaganda.
Why to waste bullets when we can demage you without firing it.
If 27th feb was a successful day then 370 act would never be happened.
27th Feb was just a test of Pakistani capabilities. You were failed in it. Thats why Modi didn't waste time annexing Kashmir through 370.

Loll.. Delusional for Indians, but not for the world. Even people like Christine Fair are humiliating Indian forces.

So your response of losing 2 jets, 1 heli, six soldiers, respect, etc was amendment in your own constitution?? What a joke.

As for 370, you pass whatever law, bill, constitutional amendment, it is of no use for the discussion with a Pakistani unless due to your amendment, United Nations changes the MAP of Kashmir.

 

[Haris Ali2140]

Bro, tactical or any nuclear bombs... It doesn't matter... It's a nuclear bomb only.

As I said, if anyone use ( tactical or big) then both will be a looser countries at the end..com

Lets talk about how Tactical Nukes come into play. In early 2000s India announced a new doctrine "Cold Start". Mobilize mechanical troops from Rajasthan into Pakistan and cutoff Sindh and Punjab meanwhile not giving Pakistan option to use Nuclear weapons. Then use the conquered land as higher negotiation position on table. This is where Tactical nukes come in, As you know they have low yield they will be used on advancing troops. When you hear Pakistan will bomb its own territory, imagine a low yield nuke falling on Indian troops as they cross Pakistani border. As Indian will be on offence, and nukes will be falling on Pakistani side, your planners now will have decide whether they want to retaliate with full blown nukes or retreat or continue the assuallt.

 

[The BrOkEn HeArT]

Loll.. Delusional for Indians, but not for the world. Even people like Christine Fair are humiliating Indian forces.

So your response of losing 2 jets, 1 heli, six soldiers, respect, etc was amendment in your own constitution?? What a joke.

As for 370, you pass whatever law, bill, constitutional amendment, it is of no use for the discussion with a Pakistani unless due to your amendment, United Nations changes the MAP of Kashmir.

If 370 was no use then why Imran Khan was on run crying like a woman in front of the world?
There has been lost of discussion on 27th feb. I don't wanna strach it as its boring now.
BTW you succusfuly trolled the thread being a so called "TT". Lol

 

[sparten]

Nasr seems to scare foreigners shitless.

 

[The BrOkEn HeArT]

Loll.. Delusional for Indians, but not for the world. Even people like Christine Fair are humiliating Indian forces.

So your response of losing 2 jets, 1 heli, six soldiers, respect, etc was amendment in your own constitution?? What a joke.

As for 370, you pass whatever law, bill, constitutional amendment, it is of no use for the discussion with a Pakistani unless due to your amendment, United Nations changes the MAP of Kashmir.

If 370 was no use then why Imran Khan was on run crying like a woman in front of the world?
There has been lots of discussion on 27th feb. I don't wanna strach it as its boring now.
BTW you succusfuly trolled the thread being a so called "TT". Lol

Loll.. Delusional for Indians, but not for the world. Even people like Christine Fair are humiliating Indian forces.

So your response of losing 2 jets, 1 heli, six soldiers, respect, etc was amendment in your own constitution?? What a joke.

As for 370, you pass whatever law, bill, constitutional amendment, it is of no use for the discussion with a Pakistani unless due to your amendment, United Nations changes the MAP of Kashmir.

If 370 was no use then why Imran Khan was on run crying like a woman in front of the world?
There has been lots of discussion on 27th feb. I don't wanna strach it as its boring now.
BTW you succusfuly trolled the thread being a so called "TT". Lol

 

[PakSword]

If 370 was no use then why Imran Khan was on run crying like a woman in front of the world?
There has been lost of discussion on 27th feb. I don't wanna strach it as its boring now.
BTW you succusfuly trolled the thread being a so called "TT". Lol

Of course we will continue to highlight Kashmir cause.. whatever you will do, even if it changes nothing internationally, we will highlight it.. lolll..

 

[Ultima Thule]

If 370 was no use then why Imran Khan was on run crying like a woman in front of the world?
There has been lots of discussion on 27th feb. I don't wanna strach it as its boring now.
BTW you succusfuly trolled the thread being a so called "TT". Lol

Hr is not crying, but telling the truth to the world

 

[PakSword]

BTW you succusfuly trolled the thread being a so called "TT".

It's not called trolling. it's called AIENA DIKHANA

 

[The BrOkEn HeArT]

Hr is not crying, but telling the truth to the world

Accept it. He cried a lot. Ab jaake chup hua hai. Because nobody listened what "heavenly truth'' he told.

It's not called trolling. it's called AIENA DIKHANA

Turn the mirror and see yourself.

 

[Haris Ali2140]

Accept it. He cried a lot. Ab jaake chup hua hai. Because nobody listened what "heavenly truth'' he told.


Turn the mirror and see yourself.

Not in the Same way Modi was bitching about Rafales after 27 or your airchief who is still bitching about it.

 

[PakSword]

Turn the mirror and see yourself.

Hahaha..

Apna gutcha Chritine Fair pe utaar

 

[xyxmt]

So you believe that a society with multiple distinctive religious cohorts, living in harmony, is not possible?

nope nipidy nopidy nope
India, Israel, EU, US and UK are the examples