What's new

Pakistan's indigenous built JF - 17 Block III to get state of the art AESA Radar, ECM and Missiles

If the much advanced cant defend the skies, we can safely assume what crap you have got there for $250 million . Why do you say built, when you are only assembling the knocked down kits from China?



Nobody ! We went alone in designing, testing and building this fighter unlike Pakistan.



lol, with an industry and academia that cant even produce a decent moped on its own, please let us know what research has Pakistan done on JF-17 ? :sarcastic: :suicide::suicide2::lol::rofl::enjoy:.



Pakistan does not even have a paint industry to begin with. :rofl:
We have an arrangement with our partner, why does it bother you what work is done where and by whom. It regularly participates in exercises across the globe and its opponents know its worth in the skies. What your fighter does except the yearly ramp walk on a trailer?
 
. .
ENGINE= USA (Kaveri ready for flight testing)
RADAR= Hybrid of Indian MMR and Israeli Elta
AVIONICS= INDIAN
FLY BY WIRE TECH= 100 % designed and developed in India
LANDING GEAR= 100 % designed and developed in India
WEAPONS=Indian and Western
MFD=India
HMD=It runs on an Open Architecture Computer developed by India which means the helmet and its display is from Israel but the software and controls are developed by India. (Samtel is developing one with assistance from Thales, so that part of it is taken care too )

:sarcastic::jester::hang3::man_in_love::suicide2::suicide::lol::rofl::enjoy: So whats Pakistani in FC-1?



Ate last we can afford to think, but look at your fate, with your puny economy and punier Industry Academia base you can do nothing but infiltrate some mullahs into India :sarcastic::shout::hang2::hang3::help::jester::man_in_love::kiss3:

Even you put gold in LCA, the main thing is still missing. JF17 defending skies more then 10 years and older boy tejas still finding his feet. Your post are of same experience what Tejas having in sky. Keep trolling

Naah, MIg 21 Bison is enough for that if it will not fall down by itself.......:-)
@Horus @The Eagle
Brother new troll in town
 
.
Well Kid ! Tejas was not built in a hurry, our forces were not desperate to induct a half cooked fighter like FC-1. Tejas in all its glory is serving the nation. the technology in it is not primitive, Tejas will serve for another 40+ years while FC-1 will grow older in terms of technology as well as Air frame in just about 25 years.
Address me properly and don't act childish way. Your LCA started in 1983 and first flight was in 2001, so don't cover your incompetence in the name that you are not in hurry. HAL still fail to give correct timeline and justification for that. Portent how Kool you are with LCA but fact is LCA lost his fight before touch the sky. By the time LCA become mature i.e at least 10 years, all other airforces retiring their 4 and 4+ fighters. So keep dreaming (and trolling here)or come back to your senses (and accept the fact) is up to you
 
.
ENGINE= USA (Kaveri ready for flight testing)
RADAR= Hybrid of Indian MMR and Israeli Elta
AVIONICS= INDIAN
FLY BY WIRE TECH= 100 % designed and developed in India
LANDING GEAR= 100 % designed and developed in India
WEAPONS=Indian and Western
MFD=India
HMD=It runs on an Open Architecture Computer developed by India which means the helmet and its display is from Israel but the software and controls are developed by India. (Samtel is developing one with assistance from Thales, so that part of it is taken care too )
Pray tell, which Indian foundry churns out these fly by wire boards?
 
.
Sir ji, JF 17 designed by Soviet Union..... for Soviet, Design purchased by chinese and done the customization for Pakistan

So what is Su 30 MKI????
BUT WE DEVELOPING BASE FOR OUR AVIATION INDUSTRY THROUGH JF17 SIR JI AND WE ARE WAY BEHIND FROM AVIATION INDUSTRY OF INDIA SIR JI @Rajesh Singh

I have read and couldn't find any such claims. Educate us here !! Please read the magazines released by HAL, DRDO and ADA for better understanding.:sarcastic:



Manufactured by Bharat Electronics from Technologies developed by DRDO.:sarcastic:



Nop, its a totally new system developed in India by Indian engineers. :sarcastic:



I have read and couldn't find any such claims. Educate us here !! Please read the magazines released by HAL, DRDO and ADA for better understanding.:sarcastic:



Developed by DRDO integrated onto HMD's procured from Israel. The HMD's are integrated into Indian developed OAC's :sarcastic:
SEARCH ON GOOGLE KID YOU FIND ALL THE STUFF ABOUT YOUR TEJ@$$ THAT WHAT TECH YOU ABSORBING FROM THE WEST KID ON YOUR MIGHTY INVISIBLE/INVINCIBLE TEJ@$$ KID, THIS PLACE IS NOT FOR YOURS GO PLAY YOUR TOYS @AMCA :rofl::rofl::rofl:
 
.
Sir ji, if you talk about aviation industry then it's good. It's good for you...
we also developed from Mig 21, hal Jaguar, Su30 mki etc.....
JF-17 is our first attempt to know how to know/do R&D and build indigenous fighter, and we already knows that JF is modified Soviet rejected design purchased by China and modified according to PAF needs @Rajesh Singh
 
.
Are the pilots satisfied with JF-17?
Do you have information about feedback?
 
. .
Well Kid ! Tejas was not built in a hurry, our forces were not desperate to induct a half cooked fighter like FC-1. Tejas in all its glory is serving the nation. the technology in it is not primitive, Tejas will serve for another 40+ years while FC-1 will grow older in terms of technology as well as Air frame in just about 25 years.
so whats the definition of desperation ...? isnt IAF at half the strength of what its need to be and hopelessly outnumbered aginst its key foe china
 
.
these topics are discussed in this forum and else where many many time .... and details discussion could be viewed in older threads .....whats the point to bring them alive again??????????
 
. .
Are the pilots satisfied with JF-17?
Do you have information about feedback?

Satisfaction is a function of success on any particular mission.

Every mission is different, and requires different parameters to evaluate, thus the term Multi-role.

However YES, the pilots are more satisfied than was expected,
they have become a part of the refinement process, and give more detailed feedback to engineers to review and improve.

To be honest, the pilots are owning the development effort to a large degree, and this is superb !
 
. . .
Back
Top Bottom