Quote: "Islamic Terrorism" or do you really mean "Islam is Terrorism"?... If you think about it not much difference between the two.
Either it is a nonsensical oxymoron, or it is subliminal.
I mean 'Islamic terrorism', as in, terrorism perpetrated in the name of Islam, justified by perverted interpretations of the Quran and hadith.
There is a world of difference between 'Islamic terrorism' & 'Islam is terrorism'.
There is no intolerance in our beloved country. Do we stop women from wearing Nikab? NO! Do we have anti-Muslim sentiments? No! Does our media highlight someones religion when a crime is committed? NO! I don't know where you are but it seems like your fed with a lot of anti-Pakistan propaganda.
Do we have laws under which the police tear down Ahmadi mosques or parts of the structure of Ahmadi mosques because the structures look like 'mosques'? Yes.
Do we force Ahamdis to declare themselves 'non-Muslim'? Yes. Do we imprison people merely because of allegations that they committed blasphemy under the perverted blasphemy laws? Yes.
Do we legally prevent non-Muslims from becoming the head of State? Yes.
We have institutionalized intolerance and discrimination, and created classified non-Muslims and Ahmadis as an 'inferior and lower class of people'. Our Ulema and lawyers are out there defending and celebrating the murder and terrorism of innocents over cartoons and calls for 'reforming blasphemy laws'. If you can't see all this hatred and intolerance right in front of you, then you only further validate my point that it is attitudes such as yours that form the basis of terrorist ideologies like those of ISIS, AQ, TTP and Lashkar-e-Jhangvi.
The law in question harms no one and it is there to protect the qadiyyani community from discrimination.
The law in question forces the beliefs of others onto Ahmadis, forces them to declare themselves as non-Muslim, forces them to not call their places of worship masjid or themselves Muslims. It is a law that enforces prejudice, hatred, discrimination and helps in permeating those attitudes throughout society.
Your argument is the equivalent of the Nazi's saying that their pogroms were to 'help protect the Jews from discrimination'.
If you truly believe that then lets join hands and change the nizamal-kuffar to sharia. Agreed?
We can 'join hands' in raising our voices to change specific laws and policies in Pakistan that are morally repugnant, such as repealing the anti-Ahmadi laws and Blasphemy laws. I have no interest in supporting your so called 'Shariah' without specifics on the structure of government, laws etc. The TTP and ISIS also claim to be 'enforcing Shariah', and we all know what kind of degenerate and evil system they support and have implemented.
You seem to be stuck on calling terrorism ''Islamic'', why? Is their Jewish terrorism? Is their Hindu terrorism? Is their Christian terrorism?
Yes, all those forms of terrorism exist.
So you support the demonizing of nabi as'salaathu was'salaam, right?
I support the freedom of speech to draw 'cartoons' or make jokes and comments as seen fit. I am not so insecure and mentally deranged that a mere cartoon of the Prophet Mohammed or comment against him would make me want to kill the individual or support those threatening and killing such individuals.
There is no compulsion in Islam.
That is precisely why I support a repeal of the blasphemy laws and anti-Ahmadi laws - there should be no compulsion on those drawing cartoons of Muhammad (PBUH) or on Ahmadis wishing to call themselves Muslim and their faith Islam.
Let Donald Trump give you your rights!
He's another deranged individual like some of our Mullah's in Pakistan - the difference is that the US does not have institutionalized discrimination like the anti-Ahmadi laws, at this point in time, whereas Pakistan does.
