What's new

Pakistani Ranger sentenced to death for killing unarmed civilian

suryakiran

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Apr 26, 2007
Messages
249
Reaction score
0
A Pakistani court has sentenced a member of the paramilitary Rangers force to death for the killing of an unarmed man in June, in what was a rare rebuke to the powerful security establishment.

The anti-terrorism court also sentenced five other Rangers and a civilian to life imprisonment. It imposed a fine of 200,000 rupees (£1,420) on the Ranger receiving the death penalty, and 100,000 rupees each on the others.

The killing, which happened in Karachi, was caught on video and broadcast on television, deepening anger against security forces already tarnished by their failure to detect the US commando raid in which Osama bin Laden was killed in May.

The shooting of Sarfaraz Shah, who was unarmed, also triggered criticism of Pakistan's human rights record and its unpopular government, which many say has failed to rein in the police and army.

The footage showed the Rangers shooting Shah at close range in a public park in Karachi named after the assassinated Pakistani prime minister Benazir Bhutto.

The civilian who was sentenced to life is seen grabbing Shah by the hair and dragging him over to a group of Rangers. Shah pleads for mercy before one of the soldiers shoots him twice. Shah then falls to the ground in a pool of blood while the soldiers stood around him.

"We have found justice. The court has given the right decision," the prosecutor, Muhammad Khan Buriro, said.


Salik Shah, a brother of the victim, said: "We are satisfied with the punishment, and we hope that the higher courts will also keep them and overturn the appeals of the accused."



A lawyer for the convicted Rangers said they would appeal against their sentences.

While commonly seen as part of the military establishment, the Rangers are directly controlled by the civilian government.


Pakistanis have traditionally been wary of criticising the army and its powerful intelligence service. "I would like to say that it was the personal action of the soldiers involved, and not an act by the Rangers," Buriro said.

In an unusual move by civilian authorities, however, the country's highest court ordered the transfer of the director general of the Rangers in Sindhfollowing the killing. In another rare sign of public accountability, a naval official said last week that three senior Pakistani naval officers would face courts martial on charges of negligence in connection with the attack on Bin Laden's compound in May.

Pakistani Ranger sentenced to death for killing unarmed civilian | World news | The Guardian
 
.
Justice at last. He deserves the capital punishment. But, i do not understand the statement "I would like to say that it was the personal action of the soldiers involved, and not an act by the Rangers,". Is the Rangers force not responsible for any action performed by uniformed men when they are on duty?
 
.
How can the writer translate that as a 'rare rebuke to the powerful security establishment'...

I mean, the law has taken its due course, a 'rouge' black sheep has been taken to gallows. A job well done for 'all' of us.
 
. . .
.
. .
no he had absolutely no affiliation whatsoever with Army......the Rangers have no affiliation with the ministry of defence....western media especially feeds off lies and emotion; they never dig deep into specifics or anything that would undermine their goals of slandering developing countries.

nevertheless, the suspect is sentenced.....the family of the deceased will be compensated. That brings this incident to a conclusion then.

while i agree that it was most unprofessional and in fact cold-blooded, people should also realize that Karachi has been a bit on edge and that the Rangers and police, however effective or ineffective they have been, are under pressure. On one hand they are told to clean up the streets (and given shoot on sight orders) and on the other hand, they have to be careful not to annoy or anger people (or political parties)


the whole law enforcement approach must be changed......but that's a whole other topic.

justice has been served; the courts ruling shall be enforced and respected
 
.
A Pakistani court has sentenced a member of the paramilitary Rangers force to death for the killing of an unarmed man in June, in what was a rare rebuke to the powerful security establishment.

The anti-terrorism court also sentenced five other Rangers and a civilian to life imprisonment. It imposed a fine of 200,000 rupees (£1,420) on the Ranger receiving the death penalty, and 100,000 rupees each on the others.

The killing, which happened in Karachi, was caught on video and broadcast on television, deepening anger against security forces already tarnished by their failure to detect the US commando raid in which Osama bin Laden was killed in May.

The shooting of Sarfaraz Shah, who was unarmed, also triggered criticism of Pakistan's human rights record and its unpopular government, which many say has failed to rein in the police and army.

The footage showed the Rangers shooting Shah at close range in a public park in Karachi named after the assassinated Pakistani prime minister Benazir Bhutto.

The civilian who was sentenced to life is seen grabbing Shah by the hair and dragging him over to a group of Rangers. Shah pleads for mercy before one of the soldiers shoots him twice. Shah then falls to the ground in a pool of blood while the soldiers stood around him.

"We have found justice. The court has given the right decision," the prosecutor, Muhammad Khan Buriro, said.


Salik Shah, a brother of the victim, said: "We are satisfied with the punishment, and we hope that the higher courts will also keep them and overturn the appeals of the accused."



A lawyer for the convicted Rangers said they would appeal against their sentences.

While commonly seen as part of the military establishment, the Rangers are directly controlled by the civilian government.


Pakistanis have traditionally been wary of criticising the army and its powerful intelligence service. "I would like to say that it was the personal action of the soldiers involved, and not an act by the Rangers," Buriro said.

In an unusual move by civilian authorities, however, the country's highest court ordered the transfer of the director general of the Rangers in Sindhfollowing the killing. In another rare sign of public accountability, a naval official said last week that three senior Pakistani naval officers would face courts martial on charges of negligence in connection with the attack on Bin Laden's compound in May.

Pakistani Ranger sentenced to death for killing unarmed civilian | World news | The Guardian

you wrote this article???
what had naval officers to do with bin laden compound raid??
 
. .
too many threads already exists...
 
.
Good riddance.

If you take the life of an unarmed person, then face the dire consequenses.

Nobody is higher than the law.

We should be giving out death sentences more often, just like China does.
Especially for corruption, we'd see that decrease dramatically if we'd sentence corrupt politicians to death.

But that would mean we would barely have a politician left in our country, and we'd also lose our President if we'd enforce this rule. ;)
 
.
Justice at last for Sarfaraz Shah. His soul will be at peace now.
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom