That happened when the U.S. nabbed OBL in A-bad. Pakistan has exhausted its credibility in the world community. Trashing the U.S. isn't restoring it.
No - the US deceived Pakistan by not sharing intelligence it developed on OBL's location despite the fact that Pakistan both provided critical intelligence leading to OBL's location, as well as allowed US intelligence activities to continue in Abbottabad, despite being aware of them before the OBL raid.
Pakistan has established its credibility through its neutralization of the key AQ leaders and members it has neutralized (more than any other nation), that the Western world chooses to ignore than in order to malign Pakistan is a problem the West has to fix.
And as for US credibility, we all know how good that is when the US leadership stands in front of the world in the UN and spews lies about Iraqi WMD's, and manipulates its media to spew the same lies and propaganda to build domestic and international support in favor of military action based on lies.
Now you want us to trust yet more outlandish claims by 'anonymous sources' without any credible evidence to support them.
The US has to provide the evidence to support these allegations - there is no reason for it not to, except that the evidence does not really exist.
What may help restore it is the Secretary-General's approach, that Pakistan must make it illegal for Pakistani citizens to commit terror against other states. Yes, I know that probably means giving up Pakistani Army control of any Kashmiri insurgency, but the cost to Pakistan alone is not worth the measly results of the past 40 years.
Kashmir is not part of the Indian State, for one, and the IA's own statements, as I pointed out earlier, indicate much, much lower insurgent infiltration activity as well as insurgent activity in IaK, so I fail to see any justification for your comment here.