Pakistani members: Please read

[CardSharp]

You know it's kind of sad that such a good and democratic idea like wikipedia is ruined by the people. As stupid as that sounds.

Sit a humongous asshat like Jimmy Wales on top of any organization and it's bound to lose.

 

[integra]

Same can be said against RAW(well they do create lots of unwanted problems over here)
Wiki is losing their credibility day by day when it' comes into politics.

 

[Salik]

.
.
Clouds cover the Sun does't change the reality the Sun IS there. World knows who is doing what. Even if they don't, media is in their hands, who cares. As the Holy Quran says we can't satisfy the non believers even if we convert to theirs. No one will cross the line in the end truth will prevail.

 

[Developereo]

Wikipedia is a lost cause.

On anything involving Pakistan or Islam, the Wikipedia admins eventually favor the anti-Islam side.

Just look at all the anti-Islam crap on Wiikipedia. If anybody wrote that kind of unsubstantiated crap about Jews or Judaism, it would be thrown out, but Islam bashing is allowed on wikipedia (and facebook and yahoo and google and ...).

 

[The HBS Guy]

Wikipedia is a lost cause.

On anything involving Pakistan or Islam, the Wikipedia admins eventually favor the anti-Islam side.

Just look at all the anti-Islam crap on Wiikipedia. If anybody wrote that kind of unsubstantiated crap about Jews or Judaism, it would be thrown out, but Islam bashing is allowed on wikipedia (and facebook and yahoo and google and ...).

Apropos your point about Islam, that is an image problem.

And when it comes to image, some muslims are doing more harm to Islam than is anybody else.

 

[Salik]

.
.
^ that's correct, first we should clean our own house before pointing fingers on others.

It will take time, but hopes are up...

 

[SMC]

^ Completely two unrelated things, however. Why does some muslims doing bad things means anti-Islam stuff must be more tolerated than anti-non-Islam religion?

 

[The HBS Guy]

^ Completely two unrelated things, however. Why does some muslims doing bad things means anti-Islam stuff must be more tolerated than anti-non-Islam religion?

These are not 'some bad things' we're referring to. There have been some grave acts of mass murder (9/11, london, madrid, Bali, mumbai, taliban etc.). Now I'm not saying that Islam and Muslims are responsible for it but a few Muslims, yes they are.

People blowing themselves up in different parts of the world killing hundreds and thousands are not helping the cause of Islam.

When such things happen all over the world within such a short span and are done by people belonging from a certain faith who promulgate their 'religious' reasons for committing such acts, that particular faith, Islam in this case, is bound to be defamed.

 

[CardSharp]

These are not 'some bad things' we're referring to. There have been some grave acts of mass murder (9/11, london, madrid, Bali, mumbai, taliban etc.). Now I'm not saying that Islam and Muslims are responsible for it but a few Muslims, yes they are.

People blowing themselves up in different parts of the world killing hundreds and thousands are not helping the cause of Islam.

When such things happen all over the world within such a short span and are done by people belonging from a certain faith who promulgate their 'religious' reasons for committing such acts, that particular faith, Islam in this case, is bound to be defamed.

Alright then, I'll interpreting your jackassry here to be the standard for all Indians around the world. Only fair right?

 

[Developereo]

Apropos your point about Islam, that is an image problem.

And when it comes to image, some muslims are doing more harm to Islam than is anybody else.

Please read my post again.

I am talking about unsubstantiated crap which is allowed to fester on wikipedia. Allegations about the Prophet (pbuh), etc.

 

[SMC]

I said bad things, and by that I meant terrorism. My point still stands. I am not quite sure you understand what I am saying. Well, that's for another topic as it will divert this one.

 

[The HBS Guy]

Alright then, I'll interpreting your jackassry here to be the standard for all Indians around the world. Only fair right?

You are free to do whatever you want. What you cannot do, though, is disprove the point I'm putting forward.

 

[The HBS Guy]

Please read my post again.

I am talking about unsubstantiated crap which is allowed to fester on wikipedia. Allegations about the Prophet (pbuh), etc.

Why don't you write to the Wikipedia management about this?

 

[killeragent]

This thread is doing 3 things.

1 Making more Indians aware about battle on Wiki.
2 Showing helplessness of pakistanis like SMC over wiki.
3 Helping the cause of indian interests in whatever way.

Am lovin it.. We are evil bhartis..

 

[KS]

Its not Wikipedia -- its 'Hindu'pedia or 'Zion'pedia.


So move on !!