What's new

Pakistani defence industrial base better than ours: Indian Army Vice Chief Lt. Gen. Sarath Chand

Not necessarily. Different cultures and peoples express themselves differently. indian behaviour is differemt to that of Chinese and Western/European.

You have no clue, do you ? Civilian nuclear technology is rather open access. Go to iaea website & search for the presentations by leading researchers from India China or anywhere else...
 
.
Our sub is Indian made & has an Indian reactor. The Russians were employed in a consultancy role.
Yeah right.. want me to quote indian sources? On how russians helped develop the reactors and whatnot? Or how hundreds of russians worked on the project and were even there on the launching ceremony?
 
.
Yeah right.. want me to quote indian sources? On how russians helped develop the reactors and whatnot? Or how hundreds of russians worked on the project and were even there on the launching ceremony?

Russians worked on that project as consultants in an advisory role. Not unlike Mikoyan assisting your JF 17 development (now get triggered as usual :lol:)

http://www.indiastrategic.in/topstories3584_The_untold_Story_of_Nuclear_Submarine_Arihant.htm

We are perfectly capable of developing a miniaturized pressurized water reactor. What logic says otherwise ?
 
Last edited:
.
Russians worked on that project as consultants in an advisory role. Not unlike Mikoyan assisting your JF 17 development (now get triggered as usual :lol:)

We are perfectly capable of developing a miniaturized pressurized water reactor. What logic says otherwise ?

Mate ; why do you keep arguing with them ; it is totally futile
 
.
You have no clue, do you ? Civilian nuclear technology is rather open access. Go to iaea website & search for the presentations by leading researchers from India China or anywhere else...



Open access? So unless you are not the inventors, pioneers and 100% indigenous creators of such technologies than anyone who purchases them (and utilises them) can claim to be leaders of that technology.
 
.
Open access? So unless you are not the inventors, pioneers and 100% indigenous creators of such technologies than anyone who purchases them (and utilisesthem) can claim to be leaders of that technology.

Oh god, are you stupid ? I meant whatever they do are on public domain. The same with India.
 
. . . . . .
No it doesn't. the first link is a false news- Brahmos integration & airframe modification was done in India

http://www.indiatimes.com/news/indi...nique-precision-strike-capability-272244.html

Also the Brahmos range was extended in India itsef.
first thing the links i gave you were from russian and indian media
if you want to give any prove info about india give it from an unbiased source not from indian media we all know how legit your media is ,if you still don't believe have some more
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/russia-help-india-develop-600km-range-cruise-missiles-koushik-das
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/...over-entire-Pakistan/articleshow/54929512.cms

https://defence.pk/pdf/threads/iaf-sukhoi-jets-being-retrofitted-with-cruise-missile-pods.20051/
Capture.PNG


The situation is quite different in the field of civilian nuclear reactors, everyone brags about theirs.



Pakistan is yet not at a stage to build operational satellites.
denying fact doesn't change reality
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Badr-1
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Badr-B
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ICube-1
read it carefully icube was developed by IST https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Institute_of_Space_Technology
 
Last edited:
.
The general is not saying something new ... any Indian whonhas a half brain knows our ordinance factories are pathetic... and we finally abe the right goverment to bury these mfers once and for all. The general added some masala to ignite passions and get the ball moving faster as to why we need to make this change quicker... we are on the right track...i think if i may add a secret program to reverse engineer any damn thing we can
Get our hands on across the entire planet!
 
.

Dated 2009. That deal fell through & HAL did the modification & integration by itself.
hal-cmd_1467022824.jpg



T. Suvarna Raju,CMD HAL, addressing the gathering at HAL-Nashik airport after the Maiden Flight of First Su-30 MKI with BrahMos Missile on June 25, 2016. (Image :HAL)

Indian Hindustan Aeronautics did not seek any help from the Russian Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM)for mounting BrahMos missile on Su-30MKI, Hindustan Aeronautics chairman said Saturday.

“This unique program was taken up by HAL as an indigenous challenge at its Nashik Division and the required data was generated without the assistance of OEM for the modification. It is not the techno-economics of the project, but HAL’s commitment to self-reliance which made HAL to sign the contract with BrahMos Aerospace (BAPL) in 2014 for modification of two Su30 MKI aircraft for integration of BrahMos missile,” T. Suvarna Raju, CMD, HAL said in a statement.


http://www.defenseworld.net/news/16...thout_Russian_Help__HAL_Chairman#.WYXAyhWGPIU

Also, this 2016 report about the first modified Su 30 MKI says.

The project, which was first conceived in 2012, saw defence PSU Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL) take more than two years to handover a modified Su-30MKI which could be integrated with the missile.

http://www.indiatimes.com/news/indi...nique-precision-strike-capability-272244.html

So the timeline is...

2009- India tries to approach Sukhoi for upgrading Su 30 MKI to carry Brahmosbut's the deal through
2012- India plans to upgrade the MKI indigenously.
2014- Su 30 MKI handed over to HAL nashik for modification.
2016- Modified aircraft rolled out.

denying fact doesn't change reality
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Badr-1
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Badr-B
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ICube-1
read it carefully icube was developed by IST

That's what I have to say- denying fact's doesn't change reality. Pakistan is in no position to build operational satellites and all these are experimental microsats- with no Attitude & Orbit Control Systems, Propulsion or payloads except for some scientific/experimental ones.

For example, this is Badr 1- It weighs 52 kg & it's mission lasted for a few weeks.

badr1.jpg


For comparison, an operational remote sensing sat (DMC3,UK) - weighs 400 kg, has a life of 7 years and carries a optical payload with 1 m resolution.

dmc3.jpg
 
.
Dated 2009. That deal fell through & HAL did the modification & integration by itself.
hal-cmd_1467022824.jpg



T. Suvarna Raju,CMD HAL, addressing the gathering at HAL-Nashik airport after the Maiden Flight of First Su-30 MKI with BrahMos Missile on June 25, 2016. (Image :HAL)

Indian Hindustan Aeronautics did not seek any help from the Russian Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM)for mounting BrahMos missile on Su-30MKI, Hindustan Aeronautics chairman said Saturday.

“This unique program was taken up by HAL as an indigenous challenge at its Nashik Division and the required data was generated without the assistance of OEM for the modification. It is not the techno-economics of the project, but HAL’s commitment to self-reliance which made HAL to sign the contract with BrahMos Aerospace (BAPL) in 2014 for modification of two Su30 MKI aircraft for integration of BrahMos missile,” T. Suvarna Raju, CMD, HAL said in a statement.


http://www.defenseworld.net/news/16...thout_Russian_Help__HAL_Chairman#.WYXAyhWGPIU

Also, this 2016 report about the first modified Su 30 MKI says.

The project, which was first conceived in 2012, saw defence PSU Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL) take more than two years to handover a modified Su-30MKI which could be integrated with the missile.

http://www.indiatimes.com/news/indi...nique-precision-strike-capability-272244.html

So the timeline is...

2009- India tries to approach Sukhoi for upgrading Su 30 MKI to carry Brahmosbut's the deal through
2012- India plans to upgrade the MKI indigenously.
2014- Su 30 MKI handed over to HAL nashik for modification.
2016- Modified aircraft rolled out.



That's what I have to say- denying fact's doesn't change reality. Pakistan is in no position to build operational satellites and all these are experimental microsats- with no Attitude & Orbit Control Systems, Propulsion or payloads except for some scientific/experimental ones.

For example, this is Badr 1- It weighs 52 kg & it's mission lasted for a few weeks.

badr1.jpg


For comparison, an operational remote sensing sat (DMC3,UK) - weighs 400 kg, has a life of 7 years and carries a optical payload with 1 m resolution.

dmc3.jpg
as i said before if you want to prove please give link from an unbiased source not from idiotic media of yours second badr-1 was first satellite made in pakistan and it was a communication satellite not remote sensing satellite
 
.

Latest posts

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom