What's new

Pakistan will remain major player in Afghanistan: US report

Windjammer

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Nov 9, 2009
Messages
41,319
Reaction score
181
Country
Pakistan
Location
United Kingdom
WASHINGTON: Pakistan is and will remain a major player in the final outcome in Afghanistan, an American think-tank has said, asserting that economic incentives can be given to Islamabad if it takes steps to restrain the Taliban operating from sanctuaries on its soil.

"The truth is still this: Pakistan is, and will remain, a major player in the final outcome in Afghanistan, and Washington's approach in this situation should be to continue to work on interpersonal relationships among key leaders, as well as coordination and cooperation along borders where enemies of one country or the other often cross," a Center for a New American Security (CNAS) report has said.

In the report, authored by two former top defense officials of the Obama administration, the CNAS calls for providing incentives to Pakistan, like free trade accord or aid for a regional energy sector, provided Islamabad restrains the activities of the Taliban within its territory.

The report is co-authored by former US Afghanistan commander retired General John Allen, the former Pentagon undersecretary for policy Michele Flournoy and Brookings senior fellow Michael O'Hanlon.

"These things should be done in tandem with Afghan leaders at every step. Beyond that, measures towards deeper economic integration may be possible with Pakistan (such as a free trade accord or aid for a regional energy sector) - provided that Islamabad takes significant and effective steps to restrain the Afghan Taliban operating from sanctuaries on its soil," the report said.

"Realistically, this agenda may not yield great fruit by the end of 2014, but it is still the right way to play for the long run," said the 16-page report released on Friday.

As for Pakistan's motives and goals, Islamabad and Washington have had such a troubled history that there is deep distrust and even a degree of pathology in the relationship, it said.

"That helps explain why some in Pakistan, fearful of future Indian dominance of the wrong type of Afghan government and dubious that the US and its partners will really remain committed to Afghanistan's future stability, continue to hedge by supporting the Taliban as an insurance policy even now," it said.

"There may be other Pakistani motives at work in the nation's Afghanistan policy, too, including the hegemonic desire to dominate a smaller neighbour. In fairness, it is unclear how much influence and/or control Pakistan can really exert over Taliban elements in Pakistan," the report said.

Pakistan is and will remain major player in Afghanistan: US report - The Times of India
 
.
Pakistan will indeed remain a major player in Afghanistan because that is just our backyard. However I believe we have learned a lot since the 1980's and will not interfere in affairs where we are not needed. We made a huge mistake in the 1980's when we allied with terrorists to beat back the Soviet union. Now the terrorists are doing everything to destroy Pakistan. We should learn from this experience.
 
.
Well that's true. One just needs to see the Afghanistan map for further details. ;)
 
. .
Pakistan will indeed remain a major player in Afghanistan because that is just our backyard. However I believe we have learned a lot since the 1980's and will not interfere in affairs where we are not needed. We made a huge mistake in the 1980's when we allied with terrorists to beat back the Soviet union. Now the terrorists are doing everything to destroy Pakistan. We should learn from this experience.

That to some extent is true but at the same time Pakistan cannot remain oblivious if there's a hostile regime imposed in Kabul.
Due to the fact that Afghanistan is land locked and shares a porous border with us, Pakistan will always call the shots.
 
.
That to some extent is true but at the same time Pakistan cannot remain oblivious if there's a hostile regime imposed in Kabul.
Due to the fact that Afghanistan is land locked and shares a porous border with us, Pakistan will always call the shots.

We have a commie regime in Nepal, we have a pseudo dictator in Sri Lanka who wants to get in bed with the Chinese more than us but we have learnt our lesson and don't bother interfering in other countries, it's their choice and we leave it to them...It would be fruitful for Pakistan too to let Afghanistan, its people and its government take its own course.
 
.
We have a commie regime in Nepal, we have a pseudo dictator in Sri Lanka who wants to get in bed with the Chinese more than us but we have learnt our lesson and don't bother interfering in other countries, it's their choice and we leave it to them...It would be fruitful for Pakistan too to let Afghanistan, its people and its government take its own course.

PK can leverage the economic benefits for itself, afghanistan, CAR's as well as India....militarism is not the solution....economic benefits are huge compared to years of war and destruction....people want to leave in peace....
 
.
PK can leverage the economic benefits for itself, afghanistan, CAR's as well as India....militarism is not the solution....economic benefits are huge compared to years of war and destruction....people want to leave in peace....

That would be the ideal scenario, taking down a regime by proxy interference will not go down well with Afghan people, Pakistan should wait for Afghanistan to come to them - they don't have much choice because of their location.
 
.
Anyone care to explain how can Pakistan play a major role. Not that i doubt her capabilities but i just dont get it:undecided:
 
. .
PK can leverage the economic benefits for itself, afghanistan, CAR's as well as India....militarism is not the solution....economic benefits are huge compared to years of war and destruction....people want to leave in peace....

sigh: well we all want that but the bigger player doesnt want.
so what do we do?
 
. . .
We have a commie regime in Nepal, we have a pseudo dictator in Sri Lanka who wants to get in bed with the Chinese more than us but we have learnt our lesson and don't bother interfering in other countries, it's their choice and we leave it to them...It would be fruitful for Pakistan too to let Afghanistan, its people and its government take its own course.
Agreed but the fact is that there are no chaos in Kathmandu or Colombo, their troubles are not spilling over into your country and you certainly don't have the dilemma of their millions of refugees. Normalcy in Afghanistan is the best thing that could happen to this region.
 
.
Agreed but the fact is that there are no chaos in Kathmandu or Colombo, their troubles are not spilling over into your country and you certainly don't have the dilemma of their millions of refugees. Normalcy in Afghanistan is the best thing that could happen to this region.

Again - I have an example of what happened in 71, mukti bahani was dismantled, India cut all connections with them and sent back all the refugees - the same could have been done in Afghanistan.

we did have a lot of SL refugees for an extended period of time.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom