What's new

Pakistan warns India against targeting its N-installations

HAIDER

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
May 21, 2006
Messages
33,771
Reaction score
14
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
WASHINGTON: Foreign Minister Khawaja Mohammad Asif warned on Thursday that if India launched a surgical strike on the country’s nuclear installations, nobody should expect restraint from Pakistan either.

Indian Air Force chief B.S. Dhanoa said on Wednesday that if India needed to carry out a surgical strike, his aircraft could target Pakistan’s nuclear installations and destroy them.

The foreign minister addressed the Indian air chief’s remarks at a talk at the US Institute of Peace in Washington on Thursday, urging Indian leaders not to contemplate such actions as those could have dire consequences.

“Yesterday, the Indian air chief said we will hit, through another surgical strike, Pakistan’s nuclear installations. If that happens, nobody should expect restraint from us. That’s the most diplomatic language I can use,” said Mr Asif.

The foreign minister, who is in Washington on a three-day official visit, met US National Security Adviser Gen H.R. McMaster on Thursday, a day after he held wide-ranging talks with US Secretary of State Rex Tillerson. While both US and Pakistani sides have described the Asif-Tillerson talks as “positive” and “useful”, Mr Asif indicated that his meeting with Gen McMaster was not as friendly as the earlier meeting.

“I will not be extravagant, yesterday’s meeting went very well, today’s meeting with Gen McMaster in the morning, I would be a bit cautious about it. But it was good. It was good. It wasn’t bad,” said the foreign minister when asked if his trip to Washington was going well.

Talks with Tillerson
The shared interest in a secure, prosperous and democratic Pakistan was one of the key issues discussed in a frank conversation between Mr Tillerson and Mr Asif, says the US State Department.

The two top diplomats met at the State Department in Washington on Wednesday for talks aimed at halting a rapid deterioration in bilateral ties.

Also read: Don't blame Pakistan, Haqqanis were your 'darlings' at one time: Asif tells US

“They talked about the importance of partnering together to establish peace and prosperity in the region. They talked about their mutual commitment to advancing a multifaceted relationship between the United States and Pakistan based on our shared interest in a secure, prosperous, and democratic Pakistan,” said State Department spokesperson Heather Nauert when asked what was discussed in the meeting.

“The foreign minister and the secretary talked about the president’s South Asia strategy that was announced back in August. They also exchanged ideas about how our countries can work together to help stabilise Afghanistan,” she added.

Although their relations were already tense, the tensions worsened after US President Donald Trump’s Aug 21 policy speech in which he warned Pakistan to eradicate alleged terrorist safe havens from its soil or be ready for the consequences.

Later, senior US officials told various media outlets that the United States could stop providing economic and military assistance to Pakistan, degrade its status of a major non-Nato ally and place Pakistani officials with alleged ties to terrorists on a terrorist-watch list.

At the State Department briefing, a journalist pointed out that when the new US strategy was unveiled, the language about US-Pakistani ties was much harsher than what Secretary Tillerson used in his remarks after the meeting. “Was none of (the punitive actions underlined by US officials) discussed with the Pakistani foreign minister?” the journalist asked.

“We typically don’t provide the fulsome types of readouts, we don’t do a play-by-play, a blow-by-blow of everything that happens in our private diplomatic conversations,” the spokesperson responded.

“What I just read to you, that’s what I can provide to you from the meeting. I know our conversations with the Pakistani government continue to be frank,” she added.

Another journalist reminded Ms Nauert in that response to a question at this stakeout on Wednesday, Secretary Tillerson had expressed concerns about the future of government of Pakistan. “What did he mean by that?”

Ms Nauert said she did not get the chance to ask the secretary about those remarks and that’s why she did not know what he meant.

Responding to a question about US-Pakistan relations at his stakeout, Secretary Tillerson had said: “We have concerns about the future of Pakistan’s government too, in terms of them — we want their government to be stable. We want it to be peaceful. And many of the same issues they’re struggling with inside of Pakistan are our issues.”

Published in Dawn, October 6th, 2017
 
. .
Both Pakistan and India can inflict heavy damage to critical installations of either countries in case of war because of the proximity and quality of air and fire power possessed by both.
 
.
Soldiers sitting in the safety of their bunkers firing with long range guns or artillery is one thing but crossing into hostile territory and flying towards and attacking targets deep in enemy land requires nerves of steel.
Do the IAF warlords really think their air force has the courage and capability to strike Pakistani nuclear or other targets....one thing is certain, any such misadventure and the Indians wouldn't need any wood to burn their dead.
 
.
First of all,targeting nuclear installations would surely meet resistance from pak air Force and there are 100s of other places where our nuclear weapons are secretly stored.they can hit it based on intelligence report but I don't think that Ms dhona have balls to do this.it requires courage.i see pak air Force even flying f7s.they fly their planes with complete command.there are many Indian nuclear installations that can easily be targeted using raad alcm while remaining in our air space and I am sure Pakistan has already increase it's range.don't consider raad range to be 300 km.it is more than that.pakistan has developed some great missiles and few of them are not even public.pakistan has realize that India is it's enemy number 1 and all our missiles are erected towards major Indian cities and it's not a joke.
 
. . .
Counter strikes would be nuclear ... on military targets and on cities.... BS dhanoa
 
. .
Soldiers sitting in the safety of their bunkers firing with long range guns or artillery is one thing but crossing into hostile territory and flying towards and attacking targets deep in enemy land requires nerves of steel.
Do the IAF warlords really think their air force has the courage and capability to strike Pakistani nuclear or other targets....one thing is certain, any such misadventure and the Indians wouldn't need any wood to burn their dead.

Nations who mean business don’t in advance reveal their intentions and plans. India has made a bad habit of talking from their rear.
 
.
Counter strikes would be nuclear ... on military targets and on cities.... bull shitt dhanoa
You think IAF wouldn't factor this in .
If such a decision is made IAF would sent at least 300 fighters Su30s + Mirage 2000s + Jaguars at one go and would take out every thing it could leaving you with least chance of counter attack . Some would even carry nukes to respond immediately .
 
.
i think Pakistan should launch preemptive nuclear attack on india as soon as possible before india launch any strike on our nuclear sites
 
.
The question is what let to Indian Air chief make such a statement and that too right after US defense chief Mattis visited India? Is US finally prepared to offer India something on our F-16s that made Indian chief give such a bold statement? You may shred it off as conspiracy but there is certainly no harm in analyzing this angle as well. Mastan sb has long advocated about the possibility of this. Araz sb and Oscar sb have routinely refuted it.
@Horus @fatman17 @MastanKhan @Oscar @araz @war&peace @DESERT FIGHTER your opinion gentlemen?
 
. .
i think Pakistan should launch preemptive nuclear attack on india as soon as possible before india launch any strike on our nuclear sites

Exactly. Do it before March 2018, our Subramaniam Swamy will otherwise be fully ready by then.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom