Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Instinct will come one Pakistan is clear in its objective.Is there a difference between the two ?
One thing for sure, if there is no peace in Afghanistan, there would be no peace in Pakistan.
And 2 things for sure
if there is no peace in Pakistan, there would be no peace in Indian border areas with Pakistan.
So yeah.
It is time for both Pakistanis and Indians to do some serious introspection.
Peace
Peace or no peace in Pakistan isn't going to affect India much, the problems between India and Pakistan are of different kind which you usually refer as non-state actors.
Talibarbarians are the non state actors.
Nothing new.
We can go 1000 years back if not more.
Barbarians come down the Hindu Kash mountains, slowly destroy Sindh valley
Then
move on to plunder Ganga valley and then settle there and rule for few centuries.
peace
Peace or no peace in Pakistan isn't going to affect India much, the problems between India and Pakistan are of different kind which you usually refer as non-state actors.
Pakistan do not have that clarity and instinct to destroy Taliban.
But Pakistan is fighting militants locally whereas US and NATO are fighting in a country very far away.. so obviously the costs are going to be high..
New Recruit
Meanwhile Pakistan had deployed 70k troops in fata upto 2009-10 and only recently they were increased by 40k More.
vis a vis in Afghanistan upto 3lac Afghan national army troops involved along with 1 and half lac Coalition forces Both ANA and Coalition forces military gear is superior to Pakistan army troops
Majority of the pak army death toll is from IED's because of extremely less MRAP available.Shortage of fund to import from foriegn countries while the local solution are not this Good.
Meanwhile i hear that ANA has surplus MRAP's.
Of all of them,BE it ANA,PA or Coalition forces.USSR troops were the best against taliban.If it was not america and Pakistan a aiding them.I am 100% sure they would had made taliban past tense in Afghanistan which was much better for Afghanistan.
Problem with USA/NATO is they always will keep Afghanistan below its potential
Anyway if your interested Join
Afghan-defence.com
Problem with USA/NATO is they always will keep Afghanistan below its potential
Anyway if your interested Join
Afghan-defence.com
you better do, otherwise you will be shot dead in nearest stadium... if you ever visit pakistani will cut my nationality card and throw it away when taliban won . i will be no more pakistani that black day .
I'm not saying, Pakistan hasn't done anything. My whole point is that, If something costs Pakistan 1000 Dollars, it would cost US or Nato forces much more than that. You have to remember, the USSR army had only prepared and were equipped to do battle with Nato forces in the european and not with irregular fighters in the mountain environment. So I don't know how you can say their troops were best against Mujahideen.
I will have a look. thanks.
cowardly reply, something like "the day the taliban win will be the day when there is no pakistani on earth"i will cut my nationality card and throw it away when taliban won . i will be no more pakistani that black day .
One thing for sure, if there is no peace in Afghanistan, there would be no peace in Pakistan.
We should help Pakistan
in applying Shariah
this was the same country getting happy when 26/11 took place !
Karma is a bitch!