Pakistan & USA signs agreement under the Hague Abduction Convention

[Pakistan Ka Beta]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1283547325143683072

United States and Pakistan to Become Partners under the Hague Abduction Convention
MEDIA NOTE

OFFICE OF THE SPOKESPERSON

JULY 15, 2020

The Department is pleased to announce that on July 1, 2020, the United States accepted Pakistan’s accession to the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (the Convention). The Convention will enter into force between the United States and Pakistan on October 1, 2020, and will put in place an internationally recognized legal framework to resolve cases of parental child abduction between our two countries. As partners, we will enhance our shared commitment to protecting children and open a new chapter in the vibrant U.S.-Pakistan relationship.

Preventing and resolving cases of international parental child abduction is one of the Department’s highest priorities. The Convention is a vital tool to deter international abduction and secure the return of abducted children. It provides a mechanism under civil law in either country for parents seeking the return of children who have been wrongfully removed from or retained outside of their country of habitual residence in violation of custodial rights. Parents seeking access to children in treaty partner countries may also invoke the Convention. The Convention addresses where child custody issues should be decided.

The United States now has 80 partners under the Convention. The Department of State’s Office of Children’s Issues serves as the Central Authority for the United States under the Convention. We look forward to welcoming Pakistan as a new partner in this global effort to address international parental child abduction.

 

[313ghazi]

Why have we signed this agreement with a country where South American children are seperated from their parents, caged, and forced to appear before judges without adult representation? A country that treats children like that cannot be entrusted to look out for the welfare of children with Pakistani heritage.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/embed/p06bfvpc/44518942

 

[Hassan Guy]

When you lie on your resume and get the interview

 

[Taimoor Khan]

What a useless so called "accord". How does it benefit state of Pakistan? Why we even bother engaging with such waste of time exercises. Talk about trade and commerce, that should be the top priority, infact the sole priority.

 

[TNT]

As if the US cares abt rights of children or anyone. They separated children of refugees from parents, ive seen those videos and they are heart wrenching. They jailed them separately, why? They killed hundreds of children in schools and madrassas in Afghanistan and Pakistan.

 

[vi-va]

What a useless so called "accord". How does it benefit state of Pakistan? Why we even bother engaging with such waste of time exercises. Talk about trade and commerce, that should be the top priority, infact the sole priority.

Is it true Gulf hired more Indians because of US? Indian contract workers in Gulf countries brought tens of billions back to India each year?
Pakistan should leverage influence to gain back the tens of billions I think.

 

[AgNoStiC MuSliM]

What a useless so called "accord". How does it benefit state of Pakistan? Why we even bother engaging with such waste of time exercises. Talk about trade and commerce, that should be the top priority, infact the sole priority.

It benefits parents with children.

I know of Pakistani parents who are separated/divorced in the US where one spouse has gotten court orders preventing the children from even visiting Pakistan because of the absence of such a convention. The argument (justifiably) being that there is little to no legal recourse available to the parent in the US to get their children back from Pakistan if one spouse takes them there permanently.

Why have we signed this agreement with a country where South American children are seperated from their parents, caged, and forced to appear before judges without adult representation? A country that treats children like that cannot be entrusted to look out for the welfare of children with Pakistani heritage.

As if the US cares abt rights of children or anyone. They separated children of refugees from parents, ive seen those videos and they are heart wrenching. They jailed them separately, why? They killed hundreds of children in schools and madrassas in Afghanistan and Pakistan.

Please see my comments above - this convention primarily helps address the rights of parents based outside Pakistan in the case of one parent taking a child/children, without authorization, to Pakistan permanently.

 

[Taimoor Khan]

Is it true Gulf hired more Indians because of US? Indian contract workers in Gulf countries brought tens of billions back to India each year?
Pakistan should leverage influence to gain back the tens of billions I think.

Not just that, but gulf do a lot of other things in favour of India just to please yanks. We hope that with Chinese ingress into ME, this cycle can be broken.

It benefits parents with children.

I know of Pakistani parents who are separated/divorced in the US where one spouse has gotten court orders preventing the children from even visiting Pakistan because of the absence of such a convention. The argument (justifiably) being that there is little to no legal recourse available to the parent in the US to get their children back from Pakistan if one spouse takes them there permanently.

These things comes secondary, as, if and when we both nations have agreed to respect each other interests and build solid trade relations which in turn can have real life impact on the lives of our respective citizens.

Everything else is BS if you ask me. Cringeworthy non sense.

Is this women still active? thought she retired!

 

[AgNoStiC MuSliM]

These things comes secondary, as, if and when we both nations have agreed to respect each other interests and build solid trade relations which in turn can have real life impact on the lives of our respective citizens.

How is it secondary?

There are people impacted by this NOW, in a positive way. Children will be able to travel to Pakistan, parents can approach the courts to get cases of child abduction resolved under this convention.

Such changes should not be held hostage to broader improvements in the US-Pakistan relationship.

 

[Dalit]

LOL The CIA operative hails a pathetic accord.

 

[Thorough Pro]

It will only help US moms, not Pakistani pops

https://twitter.com/x/status/1283547325143683072

United States and Pakistan to Become Partners under the Hague Abduction Convention
MEDIA NOTE

OFFICE OF THE SPOKESPERSON

JULY 15, 2020

The Department is pleased to announce that on July 1, 2020, the United States accepted Pakistan’s accession to the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (the Convention). The Convention will enter into force between the United States and Pakistan on October 1, 2020, and will put in place an internationally recognized legal framework to resolve cases of parental child abduction between our two countries. As partners, we will enhance our shared commitment to protecting children and open a new chapter in the vibrant U.S.-Pakistan relationship.

Preventing and resolving cases of international parental child abduction is one of the Department’s highest priorities. The Convention is a vital tool to deter international abduction and secure the return of abducted children. It provides a mechanism under civil law in either country for parents seeking the return of children who have been wrongfully removed from or retained outside of their country of habitual residence in violation of custodial rights. Parents seeking access to children in treaty partner countries may also invoke the Convention. The Convention addresses where child custody issues should be decided.

The United States now has 80 partners under the Convention. The Department of State’s Office of Children’s Issues serves as the Central Authority for the United States under the Convention. We look forward to welcoming Pakistan as a new partner in this global effort to address international parental child abduction.

 

[MuhammedAli]

This basicly means, America will use its power to take Muslim kids from Pakistan, and hand em over to gora/gori parent. In other words if a Pakistani marries a gori and they move to Pakistan and then gori gets divorced. America will take the kids to her and ensure they are raised Kafirs.

 

[Pan-Islamic-Pakistan]

This basicly means, America will use its power to take Muslim kids from Pakistan, and hand em over to gora/gori parent. In other words if a Pakistani marries a gori and they move to Pakistan and then gori gets divorced. America will take the kids to her and ensure they are raised Kafirs.

Already being done due to irresponsibility of some Pakistanis in choosing wrong spouses.

However, conversely one parent cannot steal a child and keep it from another parent. This is a positive thing. Such cases will now fall under the law.

This is why I ask Pakistanis, please choose your spouses wisely, because either it can save or break your life. Choosing a Pakistani or Pakistani Americsn spouse should be preferred.

This treaty is a mixed bag, but necessary to bring these cases under the law.

 

[AgNoStiC MuSliM]

This basicly means, America will use its power to take Muslim kids from Pakistan, and hand em over to gora/gori parent. In other words if a Pakistani marries a gori and they move to Pakistan and then gori gets divorced. America will take the kids to her and ensure they are raised Kafirs.

Courts tend to favor consistency and continuity in the lives of children when determining custody in divorce/separation cases. When we talk about 'parental child abduction', we're talking about one parent (after divorce/separation) relocating the kids to another city, state or country without authorization of the other parent.

This is supposed to work both ways - if a family is settled in Pakistan and one of the parents takes the kids without authorization to settle in the US or if the family is settled in the US and one of the parents takes the kids without authorization to settle in Pakistan.

 

[MuhammedAli]

This is supposed to work both ways - if a family is settled in Pakistan and one of the parents takes the kids without authorization to settle in the US or if the family is settled in the US and one of the parents takes the kids without authorization to settle in Pakistan.

Do you really think Pakistani goverment has any level of respect for life, property, and worthy of a Pakistani? Goras have more respect for their dogs then Pakistani goverment for Pakistanis. Kill a American pig and then kill 250 Pakistanis and that pig America will fight and stand for and go at any lengths to get justice for that one pig. 250 Pakistanis on other hand not a muscle will be moved for them. You're delusional if you think it is two way thing. It is one way street. Only reason America has got Pakistan signed this is because they can have legal papers when and if Pakistan refuses and take action in UN as well as get the big stick to beat sht out of Pekis.