Ark_Angel
PROFESSIONAL
- Joined
- Mar 8, 2016
- Messages
- 168
- Reaction score
- 19
- Country
- Location
SAM still under finalisation stage.Clear pic. I think the PN selected LY-80N -- probable illumination radar on top of bridge.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
SAM still under finalisation stage.Clear pic. I think the PN selected LY-80N -- probable illumination radar on top of bridge.
SAM still under finalisation stage.
On track, on time, exceeding requirementsany update on Supersonic Anti-Ship missile under development? Is it still on track?
On track, on time, exceeding requirements
Looks square to meI don't know, but if we look really closely, the silos might look circular.
View attachment 641135
Denel Dynamics uses circular silos in their VLS. But I wouldn't say this is a concrete sign or anything, it can just be difference in perspective/in how each of our eyes see things.
Big brother. This is a reference for you.@Bilal Khan (Quwa) Could you reach any info about VLS ? What is the origin of it ? It doesn’t seem a system that has been used by any Navy at present. I have searched Chinese VLS models but They don’t have much similarity with the one to be integrated for Pakistani Milgem. Having any idea ?
That is Chinese VLS hosting HQ-16 missiles for example.
View attachment 641100
I don't know, but if we look really closely, the silos might look circular.
View attachment 641135
Denel Dynamics uses circular silos in their VLS. But I wouldn't say this is a concrete sign or anything, it can just be difference in perspective/in how each of our eyes see things.
Check if you can see the shadow of each canister/silo.Looks square to me
Yep that was my thought as well. Assuming the silos are indeed circular (which might be the case given the shadow).Here is Algerian A200 ships mock-up. It has also roundy launchers equipped with Umkhonto missiles. From this angel, Both launchers seems quite similar.
View attachment 641174
View attachment 641175
@Bilal Khan (Quwa) Could you reach any info about VLS ? What is the origin of it ? It doesn’t seem a system that has been used by any Navy at present. I have searched Chinese VLS models but They don’t have much similarity with the one to be integrated for Pakistani Milgem. Having any idea ?
That is Chinese VLS hosting HQ-16 missiles for example.
View attachment 641100
Gents this is a model and seems to me, not to scale. So I would not surmise on the dimensions or the actual finished build.
...all said and typed, it's worth noting that, in theory, a ship of this size can carry the Aster 30.Me and @Bilal Khan (Quwa) had discussed this. I personally am of the belief its the CAMM/Seaceptor if the graphic is accurate.
"Im fairly certain itll either be the CAMM or the HQ-16, this is based off of two probabilities:
1. the designer of the graphic got lazy and didnt add a common uptake and we did select the HQ-16, which would be reasonable because we already are operating HHQ-16's.
2. The design is accurate, however, there are no VLS systems outside of like Russia that dont make use of a common uptake, there is a possibility of a CCL VLS but we dont know. However, the CAMM would fit the bill as it uses a cold launch system and also has a square VLS tube shape, the MBDA graphic i posted aligns with the graphic of the Jinnah class"
Wow100+ km range.
If CAMM is a possibility then CAMM-ER is alsona possibility and i think would be far more likely than CAMM or Aster given its what Italy is planning on using and there is said to be a big defense deal with Italy. It is only slightly longer than CAMM and is equally diameter. While its rated at 45km+,we know CAMM is rated for 25km+ and Janes has reported it was tested to ranges of 60km so i think CAMM-ER could range out to 80-100km as well. With that said, thisnis just a graphic and i dont think we can draw any conclusions beyond the confirmation of a VLS. It will most likely be HQ-16 BUT only time will tell....all said and typed, it's worth noting that, in theory, a ship of this size can carry the Aster 30.
I know it's a stretch, a real stretch, but Qatar's corvettes from Fincantieri (which is very similar to the PN MILGEM in dimensions) will carry 16 Aster 30 Block 1NT. Yes, it's expensive, but the cost is confined to 4 ships (at this time) -- so it isn't prohibitive in absolute terms. Moreover, it can change things in the region a bit if the PN ships carry SAMs with 100+ km range.
IMO this is one of those situations where it depends on (1) the supplying gov't's approval and (2) availability of financing/installments. But it'd be a real stretch, but the PN MILGEM has also been one of those cases where our dreams kept coming true (e.g., VLS).