What's new

Pakistan through history.

Can we see Pak millitary museum paintings online
Is there a link for it?
No, there is no link online.

Someone had taken pictures and uploaded it on twitter, I can't seem to find it now however.

Here are some pictures I had saved:

Depictions of IVC

1640317799889.png

1640317818686.png

1640317753326.png



University of Taxila

1640317838144.png


Battle of Chillianwala

1640317856763.png


Hunnic Devastation of Gandhara

1640317877967.png


Battle of Hydapses

1640317889672.png


Siege of Debal

1640317900947.png
 
Last edited:
Major Foreign Invasions Against Pakistan From Western Borders

Assyrian Empire 800 BC
Achaemenid Empire 530 BC
Alexander of Macedon 326 BC
Indo-Greeks 206 BC
Scythians 90 BC
Parthians 21 AD
Kushans 45 AD
Huns 450 AD
Muslims 644 AD
Genghis Khan 1221 AD
There was no pakistan in 800 BC.
ITs a pity despite living in this city for ages ,I am yet to visit that museum.
 
Mauryans were not local. This is a claim being spread by Punjabi nationalists based on an unreliable play which claimed that Chandragupta's army consisted of "Shakas (Scythians), Yavanas (Greeks), Kiratas, Kambojas, Parasikas (Persians) and Bahlikas (Punjabis)" and that he expanded West to East. However, there is very little basis for this.
We dont know the composition of his army but that doesnt nullify the point that he expanded west to east .Actually there is little basis to the contrary east to west migration and most of it based on legends..


It was only after Alexanders retreat that Sandrokutto Maurya conquered the Punjab region from the southeastern edges of Alexander’s former empire and did not "reconquer" it. Which means his expansion to east began then.. The Seleucids, a contending dynasty for Alexander’s legacy, attempted to advance into India in 305 bce stopped by Mauryans.Mauryans picked greek masonry skills. Mauryans were able to extend their empire across northern India and were the first people to introduce greek architecture reflected in present day indian ancient tombs.

Sandrakottos Maurya was most likely born in the region around taxila where he got his early schooling... there was no major maurya king before him who expanded an empire.
Even if we say his schooling at taxila is a legend, his presence there during Alexanders advent and him not being in control of present day india and even parts of punjab prove his powerbase was local to taxila a region he was likely born around...other mauryan era artifacts point to the origin of mauryan being somewhere between swat and chitral .
 
Last edited:
nalwa ranjeet singh were local

Local?....Decide 2 Nation Theory or Son of Land???........If anyone born in current Pakistan land irrespective of religion..and if you own it...than there are thousands of more examples....including Chanakya, Bhagat Singh, Indian PMs Manmohan Singh, I K Gujral, writer Kushwant Singh, Actors Dev Anand, Raj Kapoor (and most of his family) etc and several other non-Muslims.....
Nalwa and Ranjit Singh mainly fought and won against Muslim rulers...Afhganis or born iand lived in Current Pakistan....If so, why don't you own them in your history books?

And if you consider locals as Muslims...then your reasoning is invalid...
 
Local?....Decide 2 Nation Theory or Son of Land???........If anyone born in current Pakistan land irrespective of religion..and if you own it...than there are thousands of more examples....including Chanakya, Bhagat Singh, Indian PMs Manmohan Singh, I K Gujral, writer Kushwant Singh, Actors Dev Anand, Raj Kapoor (and most of his family) etc and several other non-Muslims.....
Nalwa and Ranjit Singh mainly fought and won against Muslim rulers...Afhganis or born iand lived in Current Pakistan....If so, why don't you own them in your history books?

And if you consider locals as Muslims...then your reasoning is invalid...
Where was Aurangzeb born?
Look for why he isn't claimed as local in India, then replace India with Pakistan and you will have your answer.
 
Local?....Decide 2 Nation Theory or Son of Land???........If anyone born in current Pakistan land irrespective of religion..and if you own it...than there are thousands of more examples....including Chanakya, Bhagat Singh, Indian PMs Manmohan Singh, I K Gujral, writer Kushwant Singh, Actors Dev Anand, Raj Kapoor (and most of his family) etc and several other non-Muslims.....
Nalwa and Ranjit Singh mainly fought and won against Muslim rulers...Afhganis or born and lived in Current Pakistan....If so, why don't you own them in your history books?

And if you consider locals as Muslims...then your reasoning is invalid...
Local?....Decide 2 Nation Theory or Son of Land???........If anyone born in current Pakistan land irrespective of religion..and if you own it...than there are thousands of more examples....including Chanakya, Bhagat Singh, Indian PMs Manmohan Singh, I K Gujral, writer Kushwant Singh, Actors Dev Anand, Raj Kapoor (and most of his family) etc and several other non-Muslims.....
Nalwa and Ranjit Singh mainly fought and won against Muslim rulers...Afhganis or born iand lived in Current Pakistan....If so, why don't you own them in your history books?

And if you consider locals as Muslims...then your reasoning is invalid...
Calm your t!ts.. they are local.. TNT or not it doesnt change the ground reality that they were locals and they used local people for revolt against abdali remnants... regardless anyone in Pakistan likes the two or not..
 
Ticker

@hannan021


Karal Jattmar said, Shina language has its origin from Darel, Tangir, Sazeen & Harban in Gilgit-Baltistan, Pakistan. Ancient rock carving are also present. Some state a Buddhist University existed at village Phogach during rule of King Kinishk, 127 AD & remains are still visible.


Image




Image




Image
 
Ranjit Singh was a Pakistani Sikh and he created and ruled a Pakistani empire in Punjab, Pakistan.

He was not from Republic of India.
Ranjit Singh's government's official office language was Persian & not Hindi or Punjabi, neither written in Devanagari nor in Gurmukhi scripts.

1640717572222.png
 
Mall Road Lahore was conceived in 1851 by Civil Engineer Lieutenant Colonel Napier as a direct link road between old Cantonment of Anarkali & the new Cantonment of Mian Mir.
Later it became representative of rich urban character & happening centre of Lahore during colonial era.


1640745878245.png





1640745974557.png
 
Inscribed Material from the sites of Indus Valley Civilisation of Pakistan ...................................

1640806790910.png



Reference:..... Ancient Pakistan - An Archaeological History: Volume IV by Mukhtar Ahmed
 
King Faisal of (Saudia Arabia) accompanied with President General Muhammad Ayub Khan in Karachi.1964

1641005810343.png
 
In the 1500 BC Rig Veda, written in Pakistan, western tributaries of River Sindh (Indus), which flow in Pakistan towards south south-east are mentioned as:

Gomal - Gomati
Kabul - Kubha
Haro - Arjikiya
Swat - Suvastu
Zhob - Yavyavati
Gilgit - Trstama

Kunar - Kusava
 
Where was Aurangzeb born?
Look for why he isn't claimed as local in India, then replace India with Pakistan and you will have your answer.
So to same length then, Chanakya, Chandragupt Maurya, Paouras, Bhagat Singh, Ranjit Singh, most of Sikh Gurus were not Pakistanis.....as they are not celebrated there?
Calm your t!ts.. they are local.. TNT or not it doesnt change the ground reality that they were locals and they used local people for revolt against abdali remnants... regardless anyone in Pakistan likes the two or not..

Weak argument mate....Need to have a locus-standi on who we are... wandering identities to suit the situation are not the hall mark of a sovereign society.
 

Back
Top Bottom