Imran Khan
PDF VETERAN
- Joined
- Oct 18, 2007
- Messages
- 68,815
- Reaction score
- 5
- Country
- Location
i am sure next will be this onePakistan should have gone for CH 4
It's a beast
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
i am sure next will be this onePakistan should have gone for CH 4
It's a beast
CH3 max ceiling 4.8 km Rustam 7.8 km. more efficient propulsion, fuselage might match but internally not
China confirms CH-4 UCAV in PLA service at 'Peace Mission 2014' drill - IHS Jane's 360i am sure next will be this one
yes and others as well.....Pakistan UAVs News & Discussions | Page 29Haters gona hte,but truth is Pakistan's UAV program is very old. This is a video from 1998-99 when we had a working UAV. Its not odd if 16 year later we have an armed drone
phly wo apny to poory ker le mery bhai
Pakistan should have gone for CH 4
It's a beast
You may see CH-4 soon or other UCAV as Pakistan is working with China & Turkey in this field.
CASC Rainbow - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
.
China confirms CH-4 UCAV in PLA service at 'Peace Mission 2014' drill - IHS Jane's 360
there are no much details on it.. similarly on Rustom 2, UCAV being developed by DRDO with Predator as base design.
This was simply a test. Any idea when these drones will become operational?
They aren't the same, what I stated is that certain design philosophies work. It is quite likely that this is the CH-3. After all getting blueprints and making the GRP mold is not difficult at all. And if it saves costs, Im all for it. One misconception is that the R&D process here has to match that of India.. ridiculous.. India has different goals for its industry; it needs to spend 3 billion to get indigenous capability because it has set that goal for itself. By contrast Pakistan simply needs that capability, whether it gets by spending 3 billion and does the same research.. or spends 30 million to buy if off someone is irrelevant.But Rustam H has max ceiling of 7.8 km, where as CH-3 4.8km.
Well i think time is running out for me here,,,a shame for this forum really
Comeon man,u can still take that negative back.........