What's new

Pakistan slams U.S. for killing Taliban leader

Now what about the so called MANJAN that we selling that TTP are foreign agents???
Infact we are supporters of foreign agencies I guess, NOW Zaid Hamid getting new twisting stories for us..

Never knew u were a fan of zaid hamid.. as for manjan abt ttp being foriegn agents... dnt you remember their no.2 getting snatched by the americans from the afghani NDS?

what about our army asset Haqqani and Mullah Umer???
Mullah Umer has said yesterday that we are deeply grieved of Mehsud death..
Can you exactly tell me about your stance for Afghan Taliban?
OK, now we have a deal with US that Afghan Taliban are also terrorist, For how many $$$$$...
Coalition support FUND showing the magic.

Having contacts with them doesnt mean we support them... wasnt it us who were supporting the peace process in afghanistan between US-afghanistan and the afghan taliban? in short the americans will leave... while we cant change neighbours... you understand what im saying?
What a bunch of liars we are :) 
 
.
Pakistan has been 'slamming' America for drone strikes since the last half a decade! The result? More slamming by American drones!!! :dirol:
 
.
What a bunch of gutless cowards, grow a pair and stand up to the threats instead of pu$$yfooting.

Pussies saying the above . funniest 
Pakistan to assess US ties after killing of Pak Taliban chief Hakimullah Mehsud
The writer has posted comments on this articleReuters


PESHAWAR: Pakistan will review its relationship with the United States in a high-level meeting on Sunday, the prime minister's office said, following the killing of the Pakistani Taliban leader in a US drone strike.
Mehsud, who had a $5 million US bounty on his head, was killed on Friday in the northwestern Pakistani militant stronghold of North Waziristan, near the Afghan border.

The Pakistani Taliban have killed thousands of Pakistani civilians and members of the security forces in their bid to impose Islamist rule but the new government has been calling for peace talks.

The government denounced Mehsud's killing as a US bid to derail the talks and summoned the US ambassador on Saturday to complain.

"The murder of Hakimullah is the murder of all efforts at peace," said Interior Minister Chaudhry Nisar, adding that the government still wanted to pursue talks.

Some politicians have demanded that US military supply lines into Afghanistan be blocked in response to the US attack.

Pakistan is the main route for supplies for US troops in landlocked Afghanistan, for everything from food and drinking water to fuel, and the closure of the routes could be a serious disruption as US and other Western forces prepare to withdraw from Afghanistan by the end of next year.

Pakistani cooperation is also seen as vital in trying to bring peace to Afghanistan, in particular in nudging the Afghan Taliban, who are allied but separate from the Pakistani Taliban, into talks with the Kabul government.

Relations between the United States and Pakistan have been seriously strained several times over recent years, including in 2011, when US forces killed Osama bin Laden in a raid that Pakistan said violated its sovereignty.

Despite its anger, cash-strapped Pakistan depends to a great extent on US support and the United States, despite frustrations over the relationship, is unlikely to ever make a complete break with its nuclear-armed ally.

"REVENGE"

Three Pakistani Taliban commanders said they had been due meet a government delegation on Saturday and they had been meeting to discuss the talks. They said they felt betrayed by Mehsud's killing and were not interested in talks.

A Pakistani Taliban spokesman vowed a wave of revenge bombings.


Mehsud's followers have been debating who should replace him.

Several militant commanders said on Saturday that 38-year-old Khan Said, known as Sajna, had been chosen.

But other factions of the Pakistani Taliban alliance were unhappy with the choice and were supporting other candidates, including Mullah Fazlullah, the ruthless commander from the Swat Valley, northwest of the capital, Islamabad, whose men shot and wounded schoolgirl Malala Yousafzai last year.

Said was seen as a relative moderate and if he became leader, talks with the government might eventually get going, said Imtiaz Gul, head of Islamabad-based Centre for Research and Security Studies think-tank.

But if Fazlullah was chosen, there would be little hope of compromise, he said.

Even if talks started, it was unclear how successful they would be unless the government gave significant concessions to the militants, Gul said.

"You're compromising the rule of law, and ceding ground to non-state actors, giving in to a small band of criminals. It threatens everything on which Pakistan stands - the constitution, parliament," Gul said.

"They haven't thought through the consequences of these talks. They're just firefighting because they have no long-term remedy for Pakistan's problems."

While the government has been promoting talks, the powerful Pakistani military has voiced its opposition to negotiating with the al Qaeda-linked militants.
 
Last edited:
.
Pussies saying the above . funniest
Save the false bravado, The most wanted terrorist of Pakistan gets killed and all most all of the politicians in govt and opposition gets their panties in a bunch.
 
.
Save the false bravado, The most wanted terrorist of Pakistan gets killed and all most all of the politicians in govt and opposition gets their panties in a bunch.

His killing is done in order to derail peace talks and bring in place those commanders who are anti-Pakistan.

His killing is NOT The objection the objection is about the timing.


period
 
.
His killing is done in order to derail peace talks and bring in place those commanders who are anti-Pakistan.
His killing is NOT The objection the objection is about the timing.
period
Well your objections are understandable but still even don't you think US might have been planning to get this guy for a while in cahoots with PA?
 
.
Well your objections are understandable but still even don't you think US might have been planning to get this guy for a while in cahoots with PA?

Well could be as a lay man i may say BUT those who are directly involved in policies exactly know it was NOT a favour to Pakistan rather an attempt to add to the mess after NATO withdrawal
 
.
What a bunch of gutless cowards, grow a pair and stand up to the threats instead of pu$$yfooting.

are you suggesting we stand up same way India stood up to China in last incursion and convey strong objection not to have US drones picnic inside our borders?
I am with you
 
.
Shouldn't Pakistan be happy that a terrorist is dispatched, whenever a terrorist is killed be it Osama or this guy Pakistan seems to have a problem with than.
 
.
are you suggesting we stand up same way India stood up to China in last incursion and convey strong objection not to have US drones picnic inside our borders?
I am with you
Nah .... India couldn't stood up to the way we wanted the govt to ... but we did complained about how the whole thing was treated .... no one in our own govt. gave us a sweet candy about the real situation. 
Well could be as a lay man i may say BUT those who are directly involved in policies exactly know it was NOT a favour to Pakistan rather an attempt to add to the mess after NATO withdrawal
good luck with the talks .... I guess.
 
.
Never knew u were a fan of zaid hamid.. as for manjan abt ttp being foriegn agents... dnt you remember their no.2 getting snatched by the americans from the afghani NDS?



Having contacts with them doesnt mean we support them... wasnt it us who were supporting the peace process in afghanistan between US-afghanistan and the afghan taliban? in short the americans will leave... while we cant change neighbours... you understand what im saying?
What a bunch of liars we are :) 

I was never a fan of Zaid, yes watched all his videos, Why Mullah Radio freed from swat? Hamid Mir reports that now RAdio mullah is in Fata areas. Mir is not reliable one but the way Radio mullah appointed Chief of TTP is a dubious thing, its kind of intrusion of agencies (CIA & ISI) in TTP. I like the intrusion.
If Haqqani's are our loyals then so what if they our asset then its good for us, I don't have any issue.
US will never leave from Afghanistan, they spend billion of $$$, they are not USSR, they will have their camps, assassinators, limited army, agents, they will be the watching us and will be gate keepers.

I agree we cant change neighbors but neighbors should be friendly and if it hasn't then bloody war continues.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom