PAKISTAN SHOULD NOT APOLOGISE TO BANGLADESH ON 1971 - Pakistan wishes Bangladesh well.May the Muslims of Bengal, remain happy forever

[xyx007]

Apologize to Bangladesh, for what ? We suffered deeply from the Muktibani invasion and had many family members killed by these indian mercenaries. Both the Indians and Bangladeshis have created fake propaganda against us.

Although we had a disagreement over leadership this is our only mistake, Pakistan has never been implicated in atrocities in Bangladesh. Hasina should ask Modi what he was doing with Muktibani wearing Pakistani army uniforms.

 

[SIPRA]

Quite an entertaining topic, which fails to die.

 

[magra]

Pakistan did apologize in 1974. Here is the article from archives
https://www.nytimes.com/1974/04/11/...o-bangladesh-accord-of-foreign-ministers.html

Then why does the former ambassador asks not to apologize. He should instead say 'we already apologized', and then the ball can be in BD's court. Every time BD asks for apology, you guys can just point to the apology made in 1974 pact.

 

[Vapnope]

Then why does the former ambassador asks not to apologize. He should instead say 'we already apologized', and then the ball can be in BD's court. Every time BD asks for apology, you guys can just point to the apology made in 1974 pact.

You can read the article to understand. The issue is peddled by usual quarters without knowing the history hence former ambassador is saying not to apologize.

 

[Tornado23]

That’s your POV. Mine is a little different.

You can keep your’s I will keep mine.

Moreover, my comment was to bring out a context.

Really now... Your pov is based off of?

 

[VkdIndian]

Your pov is based off of?

I am sure Google will help you in that. One suggestion - Don’t ignore (almost all of it) content that blamed Pakistan for 1971 and what happened there. Since it is fashionable here to call everything propaganda that doesn’t suit one’s narrative.

Pakistan did apologize in 1974. Here is the article from archives

Good to hear that. Wondering, why an ex-ambassador would talk of not apologising if that was already done. Very undiplomatic of a diplomat.

 

[Maula Jatt]

I am sure Google will help you in that. One suggestion - Don’t ignore (almost all of it) content that blamed Pakistan for 1971 and what happened there. Since it is fashionable here to call everything propaganda that doesn’t suit one’s narrative.

Good to hear that. Wondering, why an ex-ambassador would talk of not apologising if that was already done. Very undiplomatic of a diplomat.

They're using apology as a political tool, not going to fall into that trap

You read the article? They tell you the reasoning

 

[SIPRA]

You can read the article to understand. The issue is peddled by usual quarters without knowing the history hence former ambassador is saying not to apologize.

That is not the case. It is the official position of BD, that Pakistan has not apologized, at all. They don't deem that agreement as an apology.

 

[Deltadart]

A Muslim brother considered inferior to Muslims residing in Pakistan.

Pakistan can’t get away with what it did in East Pakistan. Cliche or not it will have to apologise.

A Hindu brother considered inferior to Brahman hindus residing in india.

India can't get away with what it did to low class hindus in India. Cliche or not it will have to apologize for this inhumanity.

 

[VkdIndian]

They're using apology as a political tool, not going to fall into that trap

Yes. The events in 1971 being given a new twist based on events before and during 1947.
My comment was with regard to what transpired during separation and forming of Bangladesh in 9171.
This new twist based on some historical event is nothing but a farce. That can’t justify the atrocities before and during 1971.

 

[Tornado23]

I am sure Google will help you in that. One suggestion - Don’t ignore (almost all of it) content that blamed Pakistan for 1971 and what happened there. Since it is fashionable here to call everything propaganda that doesn’t suit one’s narrative.

One calls another thing propaganda once proof has been given against said thing. That is the case here on pdf, when you indians come here with your 'facts' and we prove them otherwise.

Balochistan and waziristan... What happened? Go on tell me.

1971. Ill tell you some facts. MB were terrorists. They and the indian military tortured, looted and massacred the bihari population. The MB and Indian media decided to portray the very pictures of them committing the atrocities as the pak army doing it against the bangladeshi population.

Where are the mass graves of scholars?

Thats a fact and its undeniable.

 

[VkdIndian]

A Hindu brother considered inferior to Brahman hindus residing in india.

Yes. That’s deplorable. But quoting this as a simily to events in East Pakistan can’t justify them.

India can't get away

India getting away? Where and when?
Quoting out of context stuff wouldn’t reduce the pain of Bangladeshis and take away the shame of crimes by an army.

 

[Maula Jatt]

Yes. The events in 1971 being given a new twist based on events before and during 1947.
My comment was with regard to what transpired during separation and forming of Bangladesh in 9171.
This new twist based on some historical event is nothing but a farce. That can’t justify the atrocities before and during 1971.

We don't need to justify anything to anyone,
If a country is cool with it, we are cool, if someone is not
Better deal with it

and don't know why Indians cry more about this than the Bangalis themselves?

 

[Wood]

While the 1971 war is an important event for Bangladesh (and for India to some extent), the world has largely forgotten about it. Pakistan would certainly not be willing to apologize or raise the issue in their mainstream consciousness in any way. This should be expected

 

[Myth_buster_1]

Bangladesh is a very dark chapter in Pakistan history. East and west should have always been two separate nations from the beginning and both nations would have had better relations today.