What's new

Pakistan’s India obsession a mistake: Obama

Status
Not open for further replies.
Seems like a full-out attempt at diversion. I guess not expecting ares to divert would be like not expecting grass to be green. Listen, answer the relevent question. Is Pakistan planning a war by having less than 100,000 troops? You can spin it by saying that the troops in FATA are not doing anything, but fact remains that they are NOT ON EASTERN BORDER.

I will answer what you ask only in a relevant thread.

It not a diversion but actually the original topic itself(if you cared to understand it!!)

Point being made was Pakistan obsession with India(ie India can launch attack on Pakistan in future) is preventing you from deploying your entire resources to eliminate your present enemies who already have declared war on you!!
 
.
oh oh all areas are Pakistani territories so there is no question of betrayals.


and Pakistan should increase its defence against bharat aka India our NO1. enemy in the world the rest come later

you own Air Chief Marshall


 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
It not a diversion but actually the original topic itself(if you cared to understand it!!)

Point being made was Pakistan obsession with India(ie India can launch attack on Pakistan in future) is preventing you from deploying your entire resources to eliminate your present enemies who already have declared war on you!!

The 100,000 troops are deployed as a detterence against bharat. Bharat frequently makes statements about surgical strikes and doing abbotabad like operations. The only way Pakistan might reduce the troop numbers is if bharat significantly reduces the troops on its side. Bharat faces no threat from 100,000, so we can only assume that the reason why they have 80% of their military on Pakistani border is for aggressive purposes. In fact 100,000 is really the bare minimum that can be left on eastern border, that's how it is.
 
.
The 100,000 troops are deployed as a detterence against bharat. Bharat frequently makes statements about surgical strikes and doing abbotabad like operations. In fact 100,000 is really the bare minimum that can be left on eastern border, that's how it is.

You are claiming this figure again and again could you provide a link to prove it ?
 
.
You're going to have to find that yourself. I don't have time for it, and this is something extremely well known.
 
.
You're going to have to find that yourself. I don't have time for it, and this is something extremely well known.

Well find it and post it when you get time(till then stop claiming this figure.)

Because what I do know for sure ..that you have deployed close to Hundred thousand troops on you western front ..where are rest of your troops and if not eastern front?

PressTV - China, Pakistan ink military deal
 
.
No, I will not stop claiming this figure because even most of the bharatis know this figure. Your ignorance is not reason for me to stop claiming it. It's 100,000 and I am not going to waste my time on it.
 
.
No, I will not stop claiming this figure because even most of the bharatis know this figure. Your ignorance is not reason for me to stop claiming it. It's 100,000 and I am not going to waste my time on it.

If you can not back up, what you claim.. then remain adamant on it..you are just sore looser!!

And if this is such a common knowledge ..you shouldn't find it difficult to find a link..infact you wasted much more time replying to previous post..you could easily backed up your claim by ..unless offcousre you were just lying about these figures...and you can not back them up.
 
.
Ah f it. No point discussing this with an ignorant jackass. Those who know what they're talking about - carry on.
 
.
If it is a mistake, then provide international guarantees against any Indian aggression against Pakistan.

Otherwise STFU.

Thread closed.
 
.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom