What's new

Pakistan rules out talks on nuclear programme freeze

It's a very reasonable question. The answer is influential people of Pakistan have their vested interest in the US. Their children study there, marry there and live there, enjoying all that comes with living in the US. So, Pakistan's security is secondary, their investments in the west is of prime importance.

I really wish we could free ourselves from these traitorous US sympathetic pseudo Liberals, we NEED to free ourselves from these scums, the very survival of Pakistan depends on it.
 
any progress we may see in Pak-US relationship will be sabotage by Indian lobby and Trump in near future .. its best to swallow this pills that now US and India are working together, and Pakistan can't offer things which India can.. that is $$ , plus American never learn a single lesson from the history .. they are just destabilizing every single Region one by one ... its best that we start our diplomatic relationship with Regional Countries and powers like KSA, China , Iran , Russia ..
 
Pakistan rules out talks on nuclear programme freeze
By Kamran Yousaf
Published: May 18, 2016
5SHARES
SHARE TWEET
1105625-nuclear-1463545982-496-640x480.png

Islamabad rejects US demand to negotiate on FMTC, which aims to ban production of uranium, plutonium. PHOTO: ISPR

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan has turned down a US demand to start negotiations on a treaty that bans production of fissile materials used in making nuclear weapons, officials said after talks between the two countries on nonproliferation issues on Tuesday.

Islamabad has long been resisting US pressure to freeze its nuclear programme by agreeing to sign the controversial Fissile Material Cut-off Treaty (FMCT). The FMCT is aimed at placing a ban on the production of fissile materials, including uranium and plutonium.

Nuclear programme: Bill seeking changes in NCA Act dropped

At a meeting of the Pakistan-US Working Group on Security, Strategic Stability and Nonproliferation, the American delegation pressed Islamabad to start negotiations on the treaty dealing with fissile materials.

In response, Pakistan underlined its preference for broader Fissile Material Treaty (FMT) that “addresses the asymmetries in existing stocks” and said its position would be determined by its national interests and the objectives of strategic stability in South Asia,” said a joint statement issued by the Foreign Office.

The eighth round of the working group, which is part of the strategic dialogue, was co-chaired by Pakistan’s Foreign Secretary Aizaz Ahmed Chaudhry and Undersecretary of State for Arms Control and International Security Rose Gottemoeller.

Pakistan believes the treaty must include existing stocks otherwise the imbalance of power in the world will simply be further enhanced. The country’s reluctance to sign the treaty is also attributed to the discriminatory policies of the West on civilian nuclear cooperation.

US should remain in Afghanistan to protect Pakistan’s nuclear arms, says Trump

While rejecting talks on the FMCT in its current form and conditions, Pakistan, however, assured the US delegation that it would not be the first in its region to resume nuclear testing, and expressed its support for the objectives of Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty (CTBT).

The meeting of the working group was held against the backdrop of recent missile testing by archrival India that, according to Pakistan, would disturb the strategic balance in South Asia.

The Foreign Office’s statement said both sides recognised their interest in strategic stability and discussed their respective concerns over nuclear and missile developments in South Asia.

In that context, Pakistan also expressed concerns on growing conventional imbalance, and reiterated its longstanding proposal for the Strategic Restraint Regime (SRR) in South Asia and its readiness to pursue measures in the region aimed at building confidence and avoidance of an arms race.

Both sides emphasised the importance of meaningful dialogue and progress in this area and expressed hope for lasting peace in South Asia and the resolution of outstanding disputes through peaceful means.

According to the statement, the US delegation recognised Pakistan’s significant efforts to harmonise its strategic trade controls with those of the Nuclear Suppliers Group (NSG) and other multilateral export control regimes.

India’s nuclear programme ‘unsafe’: report

Both sides agreed on the value of Pakistan’s continued engagement, outreach and integration into the international non-proliferation regime.

The Pakistan delegation expressed its confidence regarding their country’s credentials to become full member of the export control regimes, particularly the NSG and the Missile Technology Control Regime (MTCR).

Both sides committed to continue cooperation related to export control capacity-building under the US Export Control and Related Border Security (EXBS) programme.

The Foreign Office said Pakistan stressed the need for access to peaceful uses of nuclear technology as a socio-economic imperative. Pakistan also indicated its interest in cooperation with the US on peaceful applications of the nuclear science in areas such as health, agriculture and water.

The US expressed its interest in exploring such nuclear science cooperation with Pakistan.

Published in The Express Tribune, May 18th, 2016.
A cap on our nuclear program............over my dead body.
 
Stage of freezing and then seizing Pakistan's nukes is being set. All you got to do is just keep doing what you are doing. Keep this moron "Wazee-r-Khazana" and thug "Wazeer-e-Azam" and permit them borrow few more billions and sell national assets.

When you are on the verge of getting bank corrupt, you do what your lenders ask.

Sultan Abdul Hamid Han used to say, "Those who receive loans also receive orders"..
 
Has any such demand been made to India too?
India has signed Nuclear deal with many countries. Pakistan has none..India is going to get NSG waiver , Pakistan has not done anything to get that kind of waiver.
Dont compare yourself with India.
 
With US influence declining within Pakistan, there is little reason to believe that Pakistan is going to give in to any demand made by the US. In fact, the opposite may end up happening, as these demands may cause Pakistan to redouble it's efforts to spite the US for what Pakistan perceives to be double standards.

I Agree !
 

Latest posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom