VCheng
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Sep 29, 2010
- Messages
- 48,460
- Reaction score
- 57
- Country
- Location
The DG ISPR has provided the 'established facts' from the Pakistani side in his official statements.
1. Location of the posts communicated to ISAF several times
2. No fire from Pakistani post - most soldiers were asleep - corroborated by UK media interviews of soldiers wounded in the attack.
3. Pakistan not contacted regarding any NATO concerns about 'taking fire' from Pakistani positions, despite channels specifically created for this purpose.
4. NATO continued attacking Pakistani positions for over an hour after Pakistan contacted NATO through established lines of communication to halt attacks.
5. No NATO reports of casualties from alleged 'fire from Pakistani posts', nor any evidence supporting claims of 'fire from Pakistani posts'.
What are the chances that ISPR will being backtracking on some of these points, slowly, once more facts are known?