What's new

Pakistan recalibrating capabilities to fight terrorists

the father of your miserable, artificial British concoction even acknowledged that IOK is disputed territory , if indigenous folk do not want Ram Lals in uniform harassing them and in no way wish to be part of the successor of British India, that does not make the kashmiri's terrorists.

I sense a deep feeling of hurt - well, the truth can be unpleasant.

There's no sugar coating this pill - if you support aiding and abetting the use of terrorism against others [whatever be the moral justification] you have to be prepared to accept being at the receiving end of terrorism and also accept that someone somewhere believes that too is morally justified. No doubt the people who planned the Sehwan attacks - and now the ones in Lahore believed those too were morally justified on some pretext or the other.
 
Attacks against occupying Ram Lals are legally and morally justified, if some Ram Lals are raping and butchering Kashmiris then Kashmiris are justified in defending their rights,,,well not according to you, i suppose you want them to turn the other cheek and if they decide to resist oppression then they are terrorists BTW I am in no way defending any innocent getting targeted deliberately ie Mumbia attack 2008,,,,,however rapists in uniform are valid and justified targets.

There is no justification for any act of terrorism against any target - at least in my moral compass.

Killing a service member by suicide attack is as much of a criminal act as killing of civilians. Such actions are cowardly and dishonourable. That is why the laws of war offer zero protection to those engaged in such actions.

Your post only reveals the good terrorist / bad terrorist dichotomy that many in Pakistan seem to subscribe to. That was (and is) a dangerous policy. Well, I have said this before and I say it again - one cannot enjoy an asset without accepting the liability.

I also reported your post for excessive profanities. Try and learn the language first before posting.
 
There is no justification for any act of terrorism against any target - at least in my moral compass.

Killing a service member by suicide attack is as much of a criminal act as killing of civilians. Such actions are cowardly and dishonourable. That is why the laws of war offer zero protection to those engaged in such actions.

Your post only reveals the good terrorist / bad terrorist dichotomy that many in Pakistan seem to subscribe to. That was (and is) a dangerous policy. Well, I have said this before and I say it again - one cannot enjoy an asset without accepting the liability.

I also reported your post for excessive profanities. Try and learn the language first before posting.
HAHAHHAHAHA you are truly delusional, international law says no such thing, one can use any tactic at their disposal as long as they deliberately do not target civilians, ie Indian bases a legitimate targets in IOK, remember they do not have the same resources at their disposal as the cowardly Indian army, so they have to get creative.
Young fellow since you reported me, from this on, do not ever, ever quote me again.
 
@Moonlight @Zibago @The Sandman @Hell hound @Path-Finder
WASHINGTON: As terrorists re-launched a campaign of terror against the nation this week, Pakistan too expedited its efforts to combat them and is quietly acquiring equipment and weapons required for combating militancy.

The US media reported at least three such deals this week, which involve helicopters and military vehicles that would enhance the military’s capability to pursue militants in difficult terrains.

Earlier this week, Pakistan concluded a deal with an Italian aerospace and defence firm, Leonardo S.p.A. for purchasing an unspecified number of AW139 helicopters.

“The AW139 is the perfect fit to Pakistan’s operational environment, delivering outstanding capabilities with hot and high performance unmatched by any other existing helicopter type in the same class,” said the firm while announcing the deal.
Despite uncertainty about bilateral relations under a new US administration, Pakistan is also purchasing weapons from the United States. Last year, the US Congress stopped the sale of eight F-16 fighter jets to Pakistan but the move did not affect the weapons needed to combat terrorists.
The US media reported on Tuesday that an American aerospace manufacturer, Bell Helicopter, would deliver three Bell AH-1Z Viper twin-engine attack helicopters to Pakistan this year. This will be the first of a total shipment of 12 helicopters. The remaining nine will arrive in 2018.

In April 2015, the US State Department approved the sale of 15 AH-1Z Vipers, missiles and communication equipment at an estimated cost of $952 million. Pakistan ordered the first three helicopters in August 2015 and placed an additional order for nine helicopters in April last year.

A US Department of Defence notification said nine AH-1Z Viper helicopters would cost Pakistan an estimated $170.2m.

Pakistan’s original request included the sale of 1,000 AGM-114 R Hellfire II missiles as well.
The AH-1Z Viper attack helicopters will be equipped with H-1 technical refresh mission computers, AN/AAQ-30 target sight systems, 629F-23 ultra- and very-high frequency communication systems, H-764 embedded global positioning and inertial navigation systems, helmet-mounted display and optimised top owl, APX-117A identification friend or foe, AN/AAR-47 missile warning systems, AN/ALE-47 countermeasure dispenser sets, AN/APR-39C(V)2 radar warning receivers, joint mission planning systems and General Dynamics M197 20mm cannons.

Pakistan has already announced that it will deploy the helicopters in counterinsurgency operations. The US Defence Security Cooperation Agency reported in April 2015 that the helicopters would enhance “Pakistan’s ability to conduct operations in North Waziristan, the Federally Administered Tribal Areas (Fata), and other remote and mountainous areas in all-weather, day and night environment”.

Pakistan will also receive four Russian-made Mi-35M attack helicopters in 2017. The US media noted that the Mi-35M was the export version of the Mi-24 gunship and was particularly suited for operations in mountainous terrain. Pakistan Army Aviation could acquire up to 20 Mi-35Ms in the years ahead.
Islamabad is also considering the Turkish Aerospace Industries T-129 attack helicopter or the Chengdu Aircraft Industry Group Z-10 helicopter gunship as an alternative to the Mi-35M. The new gunships would slowly phase out Pakistan Army Aviation’s obsolete fleet of US-made AH-1 Cobra attack helicopters, the media reported.

Pakistan signed another $35m deal with a US firm, Navistar Defence, for manufacturing 40 mine-resistant ambush-protected MaxxPro Dash DXM vehicles. The contract, awarded under US foreign military sales arrangement, includes manufacturing of various support items, logistics and technical support services.

The manufacturing will take place in West Point, Mississippi, and will be completed by Oct 31, 2018.

A press release announcing the deal said that “Pakistan will use the vehicles to protect troops against attacks from jihadist militants and other insurgents operating between Pakistan and Afghanistan”.
In a separate press release issued in Rome, Leonardo announced that Pakistan had placed orders for an undisclosed number of additional Agusta-Westland AW139 intermediate twin-engine helicopters. The aircraft will be used to perform utility and transport operations across the country. Deliveries are expected to begin in mid-2017.

Copying from somewhere ? Eh ? Don't forget to mention source. Kudos.
 
So the chaps who attack in Kashmir are freedom fighters but the ones who struck Lahore are terrorists !? Seriously?

:hitwall:
Keeping banging ur head in that wall and u'll become even more dellusional , anyways kid kashmir is an interntionally recognized disputed teritory, while balochistan or punjab or sindh or kpk are soviergn parts of pakistan, similarly if anyone attacks dehli he can be termed as aterrorist yet in kashmir its not terrorism, its a struggle for freedom recognized by the UN, kashmir is not ur soviergn teritory...
 
Im not falling back on anything,

Because you have nothing to substantiate your bogus claim. The UN has never (never means 'not once' in case you have trouble following English) accepted or stated self-determination as a basis for the Kashmir dispute.

The UN position (and Jinnah's as well) was that the dispute over Kashmir is a territorial claim based on a belief that the accession to India was not legal.

This is not surprising. Neither Jinnah in 1947 (or Nawaz in 2017) have any real interest or desire to see an independent Kashmir. If they did they would have led by example.

All this talk of 'freedom struggle' is a good ruse to pull the wool over uneducated folks and win votes in a domestic election. It cuts no ice in international forums or among those who are aware of the legalities of the dispute. Small wonder that nobody - not even China which makes a big show of following the letter of the law - have ever supported such a nonsensical basis for the dispute.

r u inbred indians, no one else, and dont twist words around, freedom struggle is a subclause to a disputed territory and kashmir in an internationally recg disputed territory and rest assured vermin we will pay u back with interest every pakistani life ur sponsored proxies have taken in apskiatsn, in kashmir attacks are on uniformed soldiers which is in coherence with the rules of war, in pakistan the attack is on civilians which makes it terrorism...

Vulgarity of your words aside - it's disheartening to note that you support terrorists like the one who killed so many of your countrymen. It seems you get some joy out of watching people get killed in this manner.

Anyway unlike you I do not support terrorism in any form and to that extent am deeply saddened by the recent blasts in your country.

Come back and post when you get an education.
 
Because you have nothing to substantiate your bogus claim. The UN has never (never means 'not once' in case you have trouble following English) accepted or stated self-determination as a basis for the Kashmir dispute.

The UN position (and Jinnah's as well) was that the dispute over Kashmir is a territorial claim based on a belief that the accession to India was not legal.

This is not surprising. Neither Jinnah in 1947 (or Nawaz in 2017) have any real interest or desire to see an independent Kashmir. If they did they would have led by example.

All this talk of 'freedom struggle' is a good ruse to pull the wool over uneducated folks and win votes in a domestic election. It cuts no ice in international forums or among those who are aware of the legalities of the dispute. Small wonder that nobody - not even China which makes a big show of following the letter of the law - have ever supported such a nonsensical basis for the dispute.



Vulgarity of your words aside - it's disheartening to note that you support terrorists like the one who killed so many of your countrymen. It seems you get some joy out of watching people get killed in this manner.

Anyway unlike you I do not support terrorism in any form and to that extent am deeply saddened by the recent blasts in your country.

Come back and post when you get an education.
I'll tell u something about my education, here a hint " i aint a school boy no more":rofl:
 

Back
Top Bottom