rajeev
BANNED
- Joined
- Oct 4, 2009
- Messages
- 503
- Reaction score
- 0
I dont know how people can compare a rail service in developed country to a developing country.
In developed country, long distance travel by train is mostly used for leisure and hence the service provided. On the top of it, all this long distance trains are owned and operated by private companies ie. for profit and for better service. Most people who travel otherwise use "aeroplane" and not train.
Whereas trains in India - a developing country, long distance travel is mostly by train - especially, for middle-class and poor which is vast amount of population. So, for what it is doing, I feel like India is doing a good job.
Where it just costs Rs. 500 for second-class tier to travel from Delhi to Chennai. Compare that to A$ 1300 to travel from Melborne to Perth. If you really want to pay kind of money and use it for leisure, compare the service to Maharaja train.
Dont compares apples to oranges - it does not make sense to any one.
In developed country, long distance travel by train is mostly used for leisure and hence the service provided. On the top of it, all this long distance trains are owned and operated by private companies ie. for profit and for better service. Most people who travel otherwise use "aeroplane" and not train.
Whereas trains in India - a developing country, long distance travel is mostly by train - especially, for middle-class and poor which is vast amount of population. So, for what it is doing, I feel like India is doing a good job.
Where it just costs Rs. 500 for second-class tier to travel from Delhi to Chennai. Compare that to A$ 1300 to travel from Melborne to Perth. If you really want to pay kind of money and use it for leisure, compare the service to Maharaja train.
Dont compares apples to oranges - it does not make sense to any one.