What's new

Pakistan protests mob attack on its mission in India

Edevelop

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Feb 2, 2007
Messages
14,735
Reaction score
23
Country
Pakistan
Location
Turkey
588171-protest-1375907804-929-640x480.jpg


ISLAMABAD / NEW DEHLI:

As tension flares up between Pakistan and India over an alleged ceasefire violation, Islamabad on Wednesday protested an attempt by a mob to ‘attack’ its diplomatic mission in the Indian capital.

Hundreds of members of India’s ruling Congress party marched on to Pakistan’s High Commission in New Delhi to protest against Pakistan Army’s alleged cross-Line of Control (LoC) attack on Indian troops in the Poonch sector in the disputed Himalayan state of Kashmir which left five soldiers dead.

asim-bajwa.jpg


The Foreign Office summoned Indian Deputy High Commissioner Gopal Baglay to lodge a protest. Baglay was told that the security of the Pakistan High Commission and Pakistan House was the responsibility of New Delhi. The Foreign Office also asked for security of Pakistani diplomatic staff in India.

Baglay was given a ‘note verbale’ on the incident.

According to Indian media, supporters of the Congress Youth Wing climbed police barricades and tried to enter the Pakistani diplomatic mission. The protesters turned violent when police thwarted their march. Police used water cannons to disperse them. Around 175 were detained, but later let off. Similar protests were also organised in other major urban centres of India, including Mumbai and Hyderabad.

Pakistani, Indian DGMOs speak by hotline

Pakistani and Indian military commanders also spoke by hotline on Wednesday to discuss the alleged ambush.

“Pakistan and Indian director general military operations (DGMOs) spoke to each other by hotline this morning,” Pakistani military’s chief spokesperson Major General Asim Bajwa said in a statement. He added that the Pakistani DGMO strongly and categorically rejected Indian allegations of the LoC violation by Pakistani troops.

Maj Gen Bajwa said the military lodged a strong protest over the violation of LoC by India in Pandu sector, in which Indian fire seriously injured two Pakistani soldiers. “After every Indian violation of the LoC, Indians fabricate something and rather put an allegation of violation on Pakistan to ease pressure,” he added.

The Pakistani commander reiterated his side’s commitment to the ceasefire agreement of 2003 between the nuclear armed neighbours.

Interior Minister Chaudhry Nisar Ali Khan said that Pakistan wanted peace and security in the region but the Indian media’s blame game was spoiling the atmosphere for normalising relations.

In a statement‚ he said the hue and cry over the latest incident in India was not understandable. He questioned how it was possible for Pakistani troops to go deep into Indian territory and kill Indian troops despite heavy concentration of Indian troops along the LoC.

Indian parliament questions Antony’s remarks

The upper and lower houses of Indian parliament were not allowed to function for more than 45 minutes each after being rocked by repeated interruptions relating to the inconsistencies in Defence Minister AK Antony’s statement on the LoC clash.

The opposition Bharatiya Janata Party filed a privilege motion against Antony and demanded that talks with Pakistan be called off.

“I had issued a breach of privilege notice against the defence minister for misleading the house and altering the statement of Indian Army. According to this, he was not behaving like the defence minister of India, but rather as that of Pakistan and I brought this up in parliament. The statement was changed after the approval of the prime minster,” said senior BJP leader Yashwant Sinha.

Sinha said there was a massive inconsistency in the account of Antony and the defence ministry. While Antony’s said persons ‘dressed in Pakistan Army uniforms’ were involved in the ambush, the defence ministry said “a patrol of Indian Army comprising of one non-commissioned officer and five other ranks was ambushed by a Pak Border Action Team close to the LoC in Poonch Sector of Jammu and Kashmir early morning”.

In his defence in the upper house, Antony said: “When as defence minister I make a statement in parliament, I have to clarify on whatever information I have. Today, the Indian army chief has gone to the area, let him come back. If there are some other details, I will convey to you.”

On the other hand, Indian Foreign Minister Salman Khurshid sought to downplay the implications of the incident. “We don’t want to create a situation that is detrimental and destructive for India’s security and peace,” he said.

But he added it was ‘too early’ to say now whether the planned meeting between Premiers Nawaz Sharif and Manmohan Singh on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly meeting in September would still take place.

He insisted Islamabad must take responsibility for the attack. “Pakistan is accountable whatever happens, the distinction between state and non-state actors is not a distinction that we accept,” he told India’s NDTV network.

Flaring tempers: Pakistan protests mob attack on its mission in India – The Express Tribune
 
Tit for tat starts.. back to square one.
 
Pakistan can protest when some one enters and trashes a pak diplomat. Or else protest is the least common Indians could do to convey our disgust at Pakistan.
 
Things are surely gonna be more complicated then anyone guessed……:lol:
 
588171-protest-1375907804-929-640x480.jpg


ISLAMABAD / NEW DEHLI:

As tension flares up between Pakistan and India over an alleged ceasefire violation, Islamabad on Wednesday protested an attempt by a mob to ‘attack’ its diplomatic mission in the Indian capital.

Hundreds of members of India’s ruling Congress party marched on to Pakistan’s High Commission in New Delhi to protest against Pakistan Army’s alleged cross-Line of Control (LoC) attack on Indian troops in the Poonch sector in the disputed Himalayan state of Kashmir which left five soldiers dead.

asim-bajwa.jpg


The Foreign Office summoned Indian Deputy High Commissioner Gopal Baglay to lodge a protest. Baglay was told that the security of the Pakistan High Commission and Pakistan House was the responsibility of New Delhi. The Foreign Office also asked for security of Pakistani diplomatic staff in India.

Baglay was given a ‘note verbale’ on the incident.

According to Indian media, supporters of the Congress Youth Wing climbed police barricades and tried to enter the Pakistani diplomatic mission. The protesters turned violent when police thwarted their march. Police used water cannons to disperse them. Around 175 were detained, but later let off. Similar protests were also organised in other major urban centres of India, including Mumbai and Hyderabad.

Pakistani, Indian DGMOs speak by hotline

Pakistani and Indian military commanders also spoke by hotline on Wednesday to discuss the alleged ambush.

“Pakistan and Indian director general military operations (DGMOs) spoke to each other by hotline this morning,” Pakistani military’s chief spokesperson Major General Asim Bajwa said in a statement. He added that the Pakistani DGMO strongly and categorically rejected Indian allegations of the LoC violation by Pakistani troops.

Maj Gen Bajwa said the military lodged a strong protest over the violation of LoC by India in Pandu sector, in which Indian fire seriously injured two Pakistani soldiers. “After every Indian violation of the LoC, Indians fabricate something and rather put an allegation of violation on Pakistan to ease pressure,” he added.

The Pakistani commander reiterated his side’s commitment to the ceasefire agreement of 2003 between the nuclear armed neighbours.

Interior Minister Chaudhry Nisar Ali Khan said that Pakistan wanted peace and security in the region but the Indian media’s blame game was spoiling the atmosphere for normalising relations.

In a statement‚ he said the hue and cry over the latest incident in India was not understandable. He questioned how it was possible for Pakistani troops to go deep into Indian territory and kill Indian troops despite heavy concentration of Indian troops along the LoC.

Indian parliament questions Antony’s remarks

The upper and lower houses of Indian parliament were not allowed to function for more than 45 minutes each after being rocked by repeated interruptions relating to the inconsistencies in Defence Minister AK Antony’s statement on the LoC clash.

The opposition Bharatiya Janata Party filed a privilege motion against Antony and demanded that talks with Pakistan be called off.

“I had issued a breach of privilege notice against the defence minister for misleading the house and altering the statement of Indian Army. According to this, he was not behaving like the defence minister of India, but rather as that of Pakistan and I brought this up in parliament. The statement was changed after the approval of the prime minster,” said senior BJP leader Yashwant Sinha.

Sinha said there was a massive inconsistency in the account of Antony and the defence ministry. While Antony’s said persons ‘dressed in Pakistan Army uniforms’ were involved in the ambush, the defence ministry said “a patrol of Indian Army comprising of one non-commissioned officer and five other ranks was ambushed by a Pak Border Action Team close to the LoC in Poonch Sector of Jammu and Kashmir early morning”.

In his defence in the upper house, Antony said: “When as defence minister I make a statement in parliament, I have to clarify on whatever information I have. Today, the Indian army chief has gone to the area, let him come back. If there are some other details, I will convey to you.”

On the other hand, Indian Foreign Minister Salman Khurshid sought to downplay the implications of the incident. “We don’t want to create a situation that is detrimental and destructive for India’s security and peace,” he said.

But he added it was ‘too early’ to say now whether the planned meeting between Premiers Nawaz Sharif and Manmohan Singh on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly meeting in September would still take place.

He insisted Islamabad must take responsibility for the attack. “Pakistan is accountable whatever happens, the distinction between state and non-state actors is not a distinction that we accept,” he told India’s NDTV network.

Flaring tempers: Pakistan protests mob attack on its mission in India – The Express Tribune

As far as my info goes, they were BJP supporters. :confused:
 
Doesn't Pakistan have armed military units based at the Pakistan Embassy where they can shoot and drop like flies these violent protesters who are trying to break in?
 
Doesn't Pakistan have armed military units based at the Pakistan Embassy where they can shoot and drop like flies these violent protesters who are trying to break in?

oh sure...shoot at Indians from inside an Embassy of Pakistan in India.....your a genius....
 
I declare them congie terrorists. Do we have a clean chit now?
 
Protest infront of embassy is normal thing..

What Pakistan is doing is inhuman.



Pakistan knows they can not stand a chance in conventional war, so they are sending there terrorists (Pakistan Army and terrorists are same, We have seem many Pakistani Army disguise as terroists)... If Pakistan believe in superiority, they should fight a small war...
 
Protest infront of embassy is normal thing..

What Pakistan is doing is inhuman.



Pakistan knows they can not stand a chance in conventional war, so they are sending there terrorists (Pakistan Army and terrorists are same, We have seem many Pakistani Army disguise as terroists)... If Pakistan believe in superiority, they should fight a small war...

Let me hit you back kid...

After 2000 India very clear about Pakistan response.... they put military on the border many times but always backoff....we have ENOUGH events after 2000 by India side ... always backoff after threating... Parliment Attack, so called Surgical Cartoon network Drama after 26/11 etc

India knows they can not stand a chance in today's War against Pakistan because of Nuclear threat, so they are providing FUNDS to Afghaniz @ Afghanistan through their so called HUMAN RIGHTS CONSULATES in Afghanistan (TTP and terrorists are same, We have seem many TTP type so called Jehadiz disguise as terroists who are killing Muslims on the name of so called JEHAD.. taking revenge of drone strikes with Pakistanis... whatay logic)... If India believe (Which we know SUPA POWAA **** ka takaa) in superiority, they should fight a war RATHER THN USE PROXY against PAKISTAN from Afghanistan...
 
asim-bajwa.jpg


:rofl: :omghaha: :rofl:

Evil Yindoo baniya Chanakyan neeti..serving since 2 BC.. :rofl:
 
Let me hit you back kid...

After 2000 India very clear about Pakistan response.... they put military on the border many times but always backoff....

India knows they can not stand a chance in today's War against Pakistan because of Nuclear threat, so they are providing FUNDS to Afghaniz @ Afghanistan through their so called HUMAN RIGHTS CONSULATES in Afghanistan (TTP and terrorists are same, We have seem many TTP type so called Jehadiz disguise as terroists who are killing Muslims on the name of so called JEHAD.. taking revenge of drone strikes with Pakistanis... whatay logic)... If India believe (Which we know SUPA POWAA **** ka takaa) in superiority, they should fight a war RATHER THN USE PROXY against PAKISTAN from Afghanistan...

you people have absolutely no clue what a nuke can do... because i seen Pakistanis throw the nuke world around when ever they have emotional tantrums ..thing is India can win a conventional war quite easily ... but when it comes to nukes..Pakitan has NOTHING to loose and we have everything...

Besides...so what if we use proxy..you used it on us since the 90s.....its only fair we pay you back in kind....in the 90s many many Indians lost their lives to your terrorist export.. Its only fair Karma bite your country back
 
Back
Top Bottom