What's new

Pakistan prime minister considers negotiating with militants

fatman17

PDF THINK TANK: CONSULTANT
Joined
Apr 24, 2007
Messages
32,563
Reaction score
98
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
Pakistan prime minister considers negotiating with militants

Farhan Bokhari JDW Correspondent - Islamabad

Key Points
Pakistan's new prime minister has said that his government is against stepping up military action

The US and the Pakistani military would oppose a deal with the Taliban


Yusuf Raza Gillani, Pakistan's new prime minister, has said that his government would rather negotiate with insurgents in the country's restive border regions than step up military action.

Gillani's remarks - which came in a 29 March speech - risk setting him at odds with the United States, which opposes negotiations with the Taliban and Al-Qaeda-backed insurgents. As recently as 25 March, US Deputy Secretary of State John Negroponte was in Islamabad to urge Pakistani leaders to stay the military course and not to offer the militants talks.

"We are ready to talk to all those who give up arms and adopt the path of peace," said Gillani, shortly after securing a vote of confidence from the newly elected lower house of parliament. "Terrorism and extremism are our greatest problems. They have put the country in danger. Therefore, it is our first priority to bring peace to the country and fight terrorism."

The speech prompted warnings from senior Western diplomats who said they believe that any offer of negotiations will be seen by militants as a sign of weakness.

A Western defence official based in Islamabad told Jane's that there was growing anxiety in Washington over reports that Al-Qaeda is seeking to train more Western volunteers at secret camps in the Pakistan-Afghanistan border region and then send them home to carry out attacks. "The concern over these reports has been amplified with the position taken by the new Pakistani prime minister," the official said. "This is no time for conciliation with these elements."

He also cited recent intelligence reports suggesting that the US military and the CIA had stepped up the number of reconnaissance flights over the border region in the past three to four weeks. "With closer monitoring of that terrain, it is possible that air strikes by CIA-flown drones armed with hellfire [missiles] will become more frequent this summer, especially if there are more attacks [by insurgents]," he said.

Pakistani sources told Jane's that the position of the Pakistani military had hardened since the summer of 2007 when 240 soldiers and army officers were captured by militants led by Baitullah Mehsud, a prominent pro-Taliban leader, and that, like the US, it was opposed to striking a deal.

In 2006, President Pervez Musharraf's government made a controversial peace agreement with Pakistani tribes with links to Al-Qaeda and the Taliban along the border with Afghanistan. The agreement failed to hold and was criticised for allowing militants time to re-organise and regroup.

On 2 April, General Ashfaq Kiyani, the chief of army staff, met Gillani and other senior leaders to brief them for the first time since the new government was formed on the military's assessment of the 'war on terror'. A senior figure in the new government said that the briefing was meant to "evolve a consensus between the military and politicians on the way forward".
 
Negotiating with the militants should be conducted in such a way that our demands are obeyed. I think some of the demands should include:
-Expelling all foreign fighters or any foreigners.
-Disarminment of the entire area.
-Extending the political parties act, so to bring FATA into the Pakistani government.
-Sealing the border.
 
Negotiating with the militants should be conducted in such a way that our demands are obeyed. I think some of the demands should include:
-Expelling all foreign fighters or any foreigners.
-Disarminment of the entire area.
-Extending the political parties act, so to bring FATA into the Pakistani government.
-Sealing the border.

and what do the people of FATA get in return?
 
Negotiating with the militants should be conducted in such a way that our demands are obeyed. I think some of the demands should include:
1-Expelling all foreign fighters or any foreigners.
2-Disarminment of the entire area.
3-Extending the political parties act, so to bring FATA into the Pakistani government.
4-Sealing the border.

I agree with 1, 3 and 4. But diarmament is very difficult. Pashtun culture of the area is the more guns the better. I have been to dara adamkhel and the people would rape anyone who tried to take away their guns. I place is for the production of guns and guns and guns!

Believe me... a gun in their hand is their life. If u take their gun its like stepping on a kittens tail... lol. Its just the culture thats been built up since soviet war. And even in peshawar most of my freinds have guns as its sort of become incorporated into pashtun culture just like attan dance... I dun think disarmament is easy and the locals will in no way be ready to give up their weapons... first kick out the bastard foreigners. These afghans arabs and uzbeks have to be thrown out like the idiots they are.

Also 17% literacy rate and only 10% of the waziristan population has access to sanitation. We have to provide basic amenities. The reason we have so many internal issues and some people hate punjabis is because development in some areas is completely negligent. Balochistan and Waziristan being the prime examples. We have to elimiante proverty and the great problems of crime and corruption. Corruption is also the reason why these areas do not develop...

This is the problem in Waziristan:

Waziristan has one hospital bed per 6,000 inhabitants, and a literacy rate of around 10%. More than 80% of males are educated in madrassas and girls not at all. Since 1997, residents of the tribal areas have been permitted to vote, but political parties may not campaign among them. Small wonder if they feel ambivalent towards Pakistan.

So i believe education, healthcare and employment services should be provided. We have to treat the people of those areas properly if we want them to call themselves Pakistanis. Even basic amenities are unavailable in waziristan so what r we talking about here?
 
Back
Top Bottom