k_n
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Dec 26, 2009
- Messages
- 156
- Reaction score
- 0
I have no misgivings about the creation of Pakistan. In fact I am in agreement with Mr Jinnah and actually thankful to him for the creation of Pakistan despite the birth pains during its creation when scores of our people died. I am in total agreement with the founder of Pakistan when he stated that an Islamic state was necessary to satisfy the needs of millions of Muslims in India to live under the rules of the Q'uran. I stand corrected but from what I have been told, Mr Jinnah actually requested an autonomous state within India to be named Pakistan. Congress and Pundit Nehru in their haste, refused to accommodate that request. An independent Pakistan should have been created but the rush in creating that country resulted in the problems which it faces today. Pakistan should have been created by consensus between the people of India. Trusting the colonial masters to create east and west Pakistan was the biggest mistake made by the people of India and Pakistan
CORE REASON leading the Muslim League to demand for an Autonomous federation of territories within Indian Union with majority muslim population and incorporating principalities under Muslim rulers in the above federation was THE MISTRUST AND SUSPISCION that muslim interests can't be taken care of under the rule/government of Hindu majority Congress . This mistrust had led to communal electorates and later to PARTITION .
The QUESTION is , what led the Muslim League leaders to wonder and fear such domination by Hindus in the political sphere ?
ANSWER provided by an average Pakistani to this is : Since , majority population of British India was Hindu and the fact that Congress which was a 'Hindu' political party swept the polls in 1946 in general elctorates reaffirms our grievances that we would have had an Anti-Muslim party governing US ( read muslims ) and thereby making us to foresake our religious practises under Hindu Rule with no safety of life/property and a bleak future in academics n career owing to 'CERTAIN' discrimination which the hindu community would have practised against US ( read muslim ) .
Well , the Muslim League supporters of that era forget , contrary to what many supporters of 2 Nation theory claim , that the COLONIAL MASTERS didnt gave any special treatment to a single religious community during their tenure as our masters . If the Indian middle class during first half of 19th century was majority Non-Muslim then it had to do with the inability of muslims to mainstream themselves with the changing times , thereby relatively lagging behind .
Thus , they had their clergy and 'Reformers' to blame and not Hindus .
The reasons for Nehru and Patel to decide in 'HASTE' were
1. The NEED for a STRONG CENTRE governing the country
2. To reject the idea projected by Muslim League of being the sole representative of Muslim community .
Contrary to what pakistanis say , The Indians in this forum , i am sure , reiterate and appreciate the need to reject INDIA being governed in 'Groups' under 'Religious Parties' . Pakistan shouldnt have been created as its the LIVING PROOF of the ideology known as '2 NATION THEORY' .
Besides , it wasnt just Nehru-Patel combined ego ( if thats what u want to call the rejection of the idea of GROUPINGS and division of political class b/w Hindu & Muslim ) behind the 'Haste' ONLY ...
The incidents like 'Direct and Noakhali' in East n 'Rawalpindi - Hazara Div in north-west . Besides , new taxation policies hittin hard the Industrial Houses ( Congree financiers ) and remaining numb on Land Reforms all along its agitation by Muslim League ( most funding to ML came from rish land-lord class ) contributed significantly to the 'HASTE' !