What's new

Pakistan High Courts updates

.,.,
The Islamabad High Court (IHC) on Tuesday removed the objections of the registrar office on an intra court appeal seeking provision of security and facilities to Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) Chairman Imran Khan in Adiala Jail.

The court directed the registrar office to fix the case for hearing.

A two-judge bench, comprising Justice Miangul Hassan Aurangzeb and Justice Arbab Muhammad Tahir, heard the case. During the hearing, Sher Afzal Marawat Advocate, the petitioner's legal representative, read out the verdict of a single-member bench issued on September 25 regarding the transfer of Imran Khan to Adiala Jail.

The lawyer said that the single-member bench had not passed any order regarding the provision of facilities to the chairman PTI and permissions to meet his lawyers and family members.

Marawat highlighted that the previous ruling did not address the provision of essential facilities to Imran Khan or permissions for meetings with legal counsel and family members.

He informed the court that, currently, the jail administration permitted the PTI chief’s family to visit him twice a week, with only four lawyers being granted access. He requested the court to amend the single-member bench's judgment.

In response, the court issued instructions in line with Marawat's request.

Meanwhile, former first lady Bushra Bibi approached the IHC seeking an early hearing into the petition seeking security for her husband Imran Khan.
 

Common consumer didn’t steal electricity: PHC​


byThe Frontier Post

Peshawar-High-Court.jpg


Humayun Khan

PESHAWAR: A two members bench of Peshawar High Court comprised of Justice Shakeel Ahmad and Justice Sahibzada Asadullah annoyed the Peshawar Electricity Supply Company (PESCO) attitude toward residential consumers during a hearing on a petition filed by residents of Matni area who have been facing electricity cuts for a year, on Thursday.

Justice Shakeel Ahmed pointed out that instead of targeting ordinary consumers for non-payment, PESCO should focus on curbing large-scale theft by industrial units. He questioned the company’s lack of action against such theft, which ultimately leads to power shortages and hardship for everyday citizens.

“Electricity theft is not done by the common consumer,” Justice Ahmed remarked. “Don’t you know people from your department are involved in electricity theft? Institutions do not work because of which there is loss.” Justice Shakeel Ahmad further emphasized the importance of providing uninterrupted electricity to those who pay their bills. “Take action against those who do not pay bills, but give electricity to those who are paying bills,” he said. “What do you say to those who pay bills? You are punishing them.”

Justice Sahibzada Asadullah echoed these concerns, highlighting the counter-productive nature of power cuts. “When you provide electricity, people will collect the bill,” he stated. “When you don’t provide electricity, people will not pay the bill.” The petitioner, facing immense difficulties due to the prolonged power outage, expressed his desperation and even mentioned feeling suicidal. PHC directed PESCO for submission a report on the matter by the next hearing, scheduled for 30th April.
 

Police treat cases of gender-based violence in a non-serious way: SHC

Ishaq Tanoli
March 18, 2025

KARACHI: The Sindh High Court (SHC) on Monday slammed police for poor investigation into the so-called honour killing cases and directed the provincial government to address such issues effectively.

The SHC observed that police officers were treating such gender-based violence cases in a non-serious and arbitrary manners and courts had been left with no option, but to exonerate the accused persons for lack of evidence.

It urged the provincial authorities that advanced investigation equipment should be procured on priority, funds be made available and the resources must be utilised immediately to train investigators so that meaningful probe and collection of evidence were carried out.

A single-judge bench of the SHC headed by Justice Omar Sial also ordered the prosecutor general to review the performance of his counterparts in those cases as lapses on the part of the prosecution were evident in the present case.

Bench sets aside life term of three men convicted of murdering a couple in the name of ‘honour’

The bench issued these directives while overturning the life imprisonment handed down to three appellants by the trial court for killing a couple on the pretext of so-called honour.

Ahsan, Sohbo Jatoi and Niaz had been sentenced to life in prison by a sessions court Shikarpur last year for killing Mansoor and his alleged female friend in December 2020.

Thereafter, the convicts had filed appeals against their conviction orders before the SHC and the bench allowed the same after hearing arguments and examining the record and proceedings of the case.

The SHC in its order noted that the entire case was built on the evidence of the mother and father of the woman and male victims respectively, but both the key prosecution witnesses in their statements before the trial court had asserted that the appellants were innocent.

Although, both witnesses were declared hostile, but a feeble and non-professional cross-examination conducted by the prosecutor did not help the case of prosecution, it added.

The bench also observed that it was not the first case as many similar ones had come to the SHC in which the police had narrated the same story as police did not collect other evidence and relied on the evidence of complainant and witnesses while during trials those witnesses used to turn hostile.

It noted that another piece of evidence against the appellants was the ballistic report of the crime weapon, but the memo of the arrest said that a USB was seized from them and there was no mention of recovery of a weapon while a police officer in his statement had denied to arrest the accused persons.

“The contradictions are apparent and do not require any commentary. No credence can be given to the recovery initiated or the credibility of the witnesses. It almost seems that the police facilitated the accused,” it added.

The bench in the order also said that a number of criminal cases coming to the SHC which had arisen out of the incident of alleged honour killing and there was an immense and immediate need for the government to address that issue effectively.

“Those who kill women on the pretext of honour have the strategy chalked out perfectly. The modus operandi deployed to commit such crime is known well to all in the criminal justice system.

Suffice to say that it ends with an acquittal because the investigator has done zero investigation. There is not a shred of evidence collect. Not an iota. Witnesses who are created resile at trial. Police officers in these cases treat such gender-based violence in a non-serious and arbitrary manner. Investigators must change their mindsets”, it added.

The bench further noted that as per the prosecutors, a large number of police force was engaged in operations against dacoits. Such efforts of police were deeply appreciated, but it must also be kept in mind that honour killing might have much far-reaching consequences for the society and the country at large than the dacoits of this province, it added.

It said Sindh police had some excellent investigators and their expertise should be used to investigate such crimes and advanced investigation equipment should be procured immediately.

“If all this is not done, offenders will keep going free because of lack of evidence. The evil will grow. Mere criminalisation of the offence will not help such if effective policing, investigation and prosecution are not done,” it concluded.

Published in Dawn, March 18th, 2025
 

Courts receive thousands of bail pleas​


LHC's Pindi Bench alone receives 2,177 bail applications

Correspondent
March 19, 2025

tribune


As Ramazan reaches its halfway mark, courts in Rawalpindi are witnessing a surge in bail applications from detainees hoping to spend Eid with their families.

By March 17 (16th Ramadan), a total of 2,177 bail petitions had been filed, including 973 in the Lahore High Court's Rawalpindi Bench and 1,224 in 72 district and special courts. So far, 329 accused have been granted bail.

According to court sources, 30 to 50 bail applications are being submitted daily. The High Court's three division benches and six single benches have decided to hear all pending bail cases on a priority basis, warning lawyers against unnecessary delays.

Additionally, district and session judges in Islamabad, Rawalpindi, Chakwal, Attock, and Jhelum will visit jails before Eid to facilitate the release of detainees held for minor, bailable offenses.

The surge in bail applications has also proven lucrative for lawyers, who are charging hefty fees for filing petitions. Each year, courts show leniency during Ramadan and Eid, prompting detainees to push for their release ahead of the holiday. This year, over 5,000 bail decisions are expected before Eid.
 
Back
Top Bottom