What's new

Pakistan has cost effective solutions to India’s ballistic missile defence system

:woot:
oye spunk monkey, Russian staff was operating the S400s, not the syrians you idiot! And the usaf and idaf "alien" technology is actually not all that alien, anything they can make, so can europe and China.

And yeah, we see how "high tech" and "well trained" the indian military ranging from the starving soldiers to the air force engineers messing up engine overhauls to the indian navy leaving the "hatch" open on your only nuclear submarine and then going for a dive...
:omghaha: oOoOoOoOoh, I'm scared of the "high tech" and "well trained" indians...:rofl:

As for us, we even train foreign militaries and train with their high tech equipment as well including but not limited to Saudi eurofighters and UAE's rafaeles. That's YET another thing you'll be getting that's dead on arrival as we have already closely inspected it, flown it and drilled against it. ;) :enjoy:


:happy:
ok cool story bro... im out since i dont like waisitng time on fanboys
 
.
I suggest you tell those Gangadeshi prisoners of war in 62 who were not a thousand miles from home yet who still feebly dropped their weapons to their higher IQ'd opponents from China, that truly was a dishonourable performance where as the 30,000 Pak soldiers fought gallantly,,,do not take my word for it, take Sams
He is being classy in victory. But check out videos on youtube of journalists. Pak Army was so scared of what the Mukti were doing to them that they preferred to surrender to Indians because of Geneva Conventions. This is just a fact you Induranis don't like too much.
 
.
He is being classy in victory. But check out videos on youtube of journalists. Pak Army was so scared of what the Mukti were doing to them that they preferred to surrender to Indians because of Geneva Conventions. This is just a fact you Induranis don't like too much.
way what you will, this guy was in front and center of the whole action, you heard it from your own horse's mouth...
 
.
i don't like this theory of not developing anti ballistic missile systems.we must care about population.how can we save ourselves from indian ballistic missile attack? nobody can target all incoming missiles.also s-400 is a big problem and i think we are really frustrated.i think it's right time to start developing ICBMs and anti ballistic missile systems.
 
.
i don't like this theory of not developing anti ballistic missile systems.we must care about population.how can we save ourselves from indian ballistic missile attack? nobody can target all incoming missiles.also s-400 is a big problem and i think we are really frustrated.i think it's right time to start developing ICBMs and anti ballistic missile systems.
the only effect ABM system to date is the patriot that has proven itself in battles far bigger than what the s400 faced. the s400 fell flat on its face when it faced a fraction of what the patriot has been facing.

its a classic feel good weapon system that provides the buyer a false sense of security...and that false sense of security is very marketable.

And we have no need for ICBMs (yet) even though we can make them at well. Currently, our direct enemy india is fully covered and within our reach as is the indirect enemy isreal. For now, this is good enough.
 
.
usaf idaf are different game come to ur senses fanboy. they have alien technologies and csn pretty much jam anything... as for syria... well they are not among smart militaries.. if u give a riksaw driver f22 he cant do shit with it... but now time has changed for indian military.. they now have access to superior tech and training unlike paf which can only depend on china and turkey to some extent.
btw it not good to be so deluded with fanboy thinking. u need to accept ur shortfalls and improve on it instead of thinking all is well.
As for Turkey, she knows how to handle S300/400 etc....
 
. . . .
Dude... the real thing ids that Russia is cash starved and putin arm twisted modi into buying it with the blackmail that it would sell fighters to Pakistan if he didn't. Remember about 3 years ago, india had attached the deal that it would buy the s400s ONLY if Russia transferred the PAK-FA technology to it but didn't want to share the cost. well the PAKFA program is dead now so india and actually forgotten about the s400s until putin threatened modi. That's why you don't huge celebrations on the indian media...deep inside, they know it's a piece of junk as proven over the skies of Syria many times over. Ab indians rotsy rahein, junk will remain as junk...8-)

But we were supposed to get 13+ but now only getting 5 systems. So India buying only 40% of the originally planned. India is going for THAAD & PAC3 for the remaining.
 
.
the only effect ABM system to date is the patriot that has proven itself in battles far bigger than what the s400 faced. the s400 fell flat on its face when it faced a fraction of what the patriot has been facing.

its a classic feel good weapon system that provides the buyer a false sense of security...and that false sense of security is very marketable.

And we have no need for ICBMs (yet) even though we can make them at well. Currently, our direct enemy india is fully covered and within our reach as is the indirect enemy isreal. For now, this is good enough.

i think s-400 is a good system.it's long range is a problem for fighter jets.we must find a system where we can target indian fighter inside india.it can cover large diameter.we must introduce something new and we really need it.india should also feel the same when they enter in pakistani air space.i don't know about patriot but this s-400 is a russian system and it will work.i don't now if it will miss it's target or not but we need to be cautious and we must do everything to counter it.i know we don't need icbm but sometimes deadly weapons are necessary to keep your enemy away.they must feel fear and i think we must start developing everything that can give india headaches.
 
.
But we were supposed to get 13+ but now only getting 5 systems. So India buying only 40% of the originally planned. India is going for THAAD & PAC3 for the remaining.
not so sure if uncle sam would trust india with pac3 or the thaad given that india is arm-twisted by Russia to remain close to moscow by blackmailing it with selling fighters to Pakistan. Russia can easily gain access to thaad's tech that way.

i think s-400 is a good system.it's long range is a problem for fighter jets.we must find a system where we can target indian fighter inside india.it can cover large diameter.we must introduce something new and we really need it.india should also feel the same when they enter in pakistani air space.i don't know about patriot but this s-400 is a russian system and it will work.i don't now if it will miss it's target or not but we need to be cautious and we must do everything to counter it.
yar woh sab theek hay IF the radar isn't blinded. alas, there is no such thing as an unjammable radar. remove the radar, remove the system.
 
.
About roughly 40% of Kashmir is in Pak control, not bad for a nation a mere fraction of your size in population and area, not too mention Pak army jumped into the war much later, well after the tribal incursions retreat and I must mention Ganagdesh inherited majority of resources from British India in terms of equipment ,ammunition etc yet the sons of Indus still held you Ganga-dwellers to stalemate and deprive you off central asia as well as preventing you from cutting us off from our most strategic ally China, give Kudos to Pak army my dear friend from the Ganga for if it was not the determination and fortitude of Pak army Gilgit Baltistan and Azad Kashmir would be in Gangadeshi control and you folks would have had a strategic route to Afghanistan and central Asia and China would have had no CPEC nor we a supply line to the Chinese, we would truly have been at your "MERCY", now I hope you understand why we all LOVE Pak army with all our hearts.Kudos young fellow.
:pakistan::smitten:
About roughly 40% of Kashmir is in Pak control, not bad for a nation a mere fraction of your size in population and area, not too mention Pak army jumped into the war much later, well after the tribal incursions retreat and I must mention Ganagdesh inherited majority of resources from British India in terms of equipment ,ammunition etc yet the sons of Indus still held you Ganga-dwellers to stalemate and deprive you off central asia as well as preventing you from cutting us off from our most strategic ally China, give Kudos to Pak army my dear friend from the Ganga for if it was not the determination and fortitude of Pak army Gilgit Baltistan and Azad Kashmir would be in Gangadeshi control and you folks would have had a strategic route to Afghanistan and central Asia and China would have had no CPEC nor we a supply line to the Chinese, we would truly have been at your "MERCY", now I hope you understand why we all LOVE Pak army with all our hearts.Kudos young fellow.
:pakistan::smitten:
Did you some how miss the 35% of kashmir in our control and 15% kashmir in China's control? indian denial anyone? :lol: don't worry about our "corrupt" generals. worry about the corrupton in your own generals who gobble up the funds arms, ammunition and food for the foot soldiers and use the foot soldiers to walk their dogs! apni khair manao bittva. ;)
1948 doesn't count. Then the control of South Asia was still not in our respective hands. The British orchestrated the war and administration.

The issue here is not who is stronger. The issue is corruption in Pakistan government and army.
 
.
i think s-400 is a good system.it's long range is a problem for fighter jets.we must find a system where we can target indian fighter inside india.it can cover large diameter.we must introduce something new and we really need it.india should also feel the same when they enter in pakistani air space.i don't know about patriot but this s-400 is a russian system and it will work.i don't now if it will miss it's target or not but we need to be cautious and we must do everything to counter it.
In this era of EW warfare with jamming, deceptions etc. (all based on ultra fast band-gap engineered GaN based devices with minute frequency/power/noise etc. discriminations), nothing is feel-safe!!!!
 
Last edited:
.
1948 doesn't count. Then the control of South Asia was still not in our respective hands.

The issue here is not who is stronger. The issue is corruption in Pakistan government and army.
1948 absolutely counts and was one of your many defeats. You'll just have to live with it. and its not your place to talk about corruption...your government all the way the lowest ranking soldiers are slithering in corruption as per the admissions of your own soldiers. We thew and sentenced an extremely rich and powerful prime minister for corruption. How many have you thrown out? ZERO! auqaat may reh kar baat kia kar!
 
.
Back
Top Bottom