What's new

Pakistan force is a warning to Tehran

Qutb-ud-din Aybak

SENIOR MEMBER
Joined
Jan 22, 2015
Messages
6,968
Reaction score
1
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
&NCS_modified=20170314151414&MaxW=640&imageVersion=default&AR-170319609.jpg

Pakistan could send troops to Saudi Arabia. Arif Ali / AFP
Pakistan force is a warning to Tehran
National Editorial

March 14, 2017 Updated: March 14, 2017 06:14 PM

If the plans currently under discussion between Saudi Arabia and Pakistan bear fruit, they will signal a further shift in relations between the two countries. Of greater import, however, will be the message they send to Iran.

The plans under discussion revolve around creating an emergency response force inside Saudi Arabia, composed of thousands of Pakistani troops. This brigade would ostensibly be there to "bulk up" Riyadh’s military at a time when the kingdom is fighting an intense war in Yemen. That Pakistan would send troops to a GCC country is not especially new – novel, certainly, but Pakistani troops have in the past provided assistance to Saudi Arabia at times of particular danger. They were involved, for example, in the country during the first Gulf War.

But there is a wider message being conveyed. The kingdom was the driving force behind the creation of the "Muslim Nato", as the Islamic Military Alliance to Fight Terrorism, a coalition of 39 Muslim countries, is sometimes called. This coalition – which excludes Iran – is meant to be headed by a retired Pakistani army chief, General Raheel Sharif, although he appears to still be clarifying his role, and more broadly Islamabad has been hesitant to take sides so overtly between Saudi Arabia and Iran.

Yet the recent move signals that Islamabad has decided to prioritise its relationship with Saudi Arabia and the wider Gulf. That ought to be a message – and a warning – to Iran. Tehran needs to recognise that its meddling in the Middle East has profound consequences, for the region and for itself. It is because of Iranian meddling in Iraq, Syria, Yemen and elsewhere that so much of the sectarian conflicts in the region has been created or exacerbated.

It is the Saudi reaction to that meddling that has resulted in the creation of this coalition. And by allowing Pakistani troops into the kingdom, Islamabad is showing that it, too, recognises how important defeating terrorism and instability is for Pakistan itself – after all, the sectarianism that has been inflamed in the Middle East also has an effect in Pakistan. The two regions are interlinked.

Hopefully Tehran will get the message. When a country on its eastern flank, Pakistan, sends troops to a country to its west, in part to defend against conflicts that Tehran itself has stoked, it should be obvious that Iran is not behaving responsibly in its own neighbourhood. Tehran’s policies are pushing countries around it closer together.

One-page article

If the plans currently under discussion between Saudi Arabia and Pakistan bear fruit, they will signal a further shift in relations between the two countries. Of greater import, however, will be the message they send to Iran.

The plans under discussion revolve around creating an emergency response force inside Saudi Arabia, composed of thousands of Pakistani troops. This brigade would ostensibly be there to "bulk up" Riyadh’s military at a time when the kingdom is fighting an intense war in Yemen. That Pakistan would send troops to a GCC country is not especially new – novel, certainly, but Pakistani troops have in the past provided assistance to Saudi Arabia at times of particular danger. They were involved, for example, in the country during the first Gulf War.

But there is a wider message being conveyed. The kingdom was the driving force behind the creation of the "Muslim Nato", as the Islamic Military Alliance to Fight Terrorism, a coalition of 39 Muslim countries, is sometimes called. This coalition – which excludes Iran – is meant to be headed by a retired Pakistani army chief, General Raheel Sharif, although he appears to still be clarifying his role, and more broadly Islamabad has been hesitant to take sides so overtly between Saudi Arabia and Iran.

Yet the recent move signals that Islamabad has decided to prioritise its relationship with Saudi Arabia and the wider Gulf. That ought to be a message – and a warning – to Iran. Tehran needs to recognise that its meddling in the Middle East has profound consequences, for the region and for itself. It is because of Iranian meddling in Iraq, Syria, Yemen and elsewhere that so much of the sectarian conflicts in the region has been created or exacerbated.

It is the Saudi reaction to that meddling that has resulted in the creation of this coalition. And by allowing Pakistani troops into the kingdom, Islamabad is showing that it, too, recognises how important defeating terrorism and instability is for Pakistan itself – after all, the sectarianism that has been inflamed in the Middle East also has an effect in Pakistan. The two regions are interlinked.

Hopefully Tehran will get the message. When a country on its eastern flank, Pakistan, sends troops to a country to its west, in part to defend against conflicts that Tehran itself has stoked, it should be obvious that Iran is not behaving responsibly in its own neighbourhood. Tehran’s policies are pushing countries around it closer together.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
It's not a message to anyone. Pakistan would have assured iran that we are only defending Saudi arabia not attacking anyone.
Also iranian military leadership was in Pakistan. They were shown areas of iran mortor attacks and thy rejected the claims, ordered inquiry and called Pakistanis a muslim brother they would not even think of harming. Similar message was conveyed from or side.
Our policy is balanced. We will defend iran too if it ever needed help like we supported them in iran-iraq war. We were not been able to give them much weapons as US made weapons were not allowed to be given but we did what we could. Similarly iran supported Pakistan and also supports our stance on kashmir.
 
. .
Source is exaggerating the matter too much that too as the same is not decided yet, IMO. Also, Pakistan never treated Tehran Delhi relations like this before and never felt the same as anti-Pakistan so now Iran can understand as well that our relations are equal for everyone and we are practicing our diplomacy through different means. There is no such thing as message except different forces in these times would be trying to derail the process as well as create misunderstanding and ambiguities among neighbors and friendly nations. Iran is actively participating with Pakistan for different projects reportedly and we had many visits in recent past and on other hand we have good relations with GCC countries as well.
 
.
Arab media is trying to create a wedge between Pak-Iran relations here which have just recently begun improving.
 
. .
This is nonsense. Thousands of civilians and millions with nothing to eat in Yemen. What a might. Saudis and GCC need to be taken to ICC for trials on what they are doing to the plight of civilians in Yemen.

They dont have balls to go and remediate situation in Syria but use the airpower on innocent civilians in Yemen
 
.
http://www.thenational.ae/opinion/editorial/pakistan-force-is-a-warning-to-tehran

&NCS_modified=20170314151414&MaxW=640&imageVersion=default&AR-170319609.jpg

Pakistan could send troops to Saudi Arabia. Arif Ali / AFP
Pakistan force is a warning to Tehran
National Editorial

March 14, 2017 Updated: March 14, 2017 06:14 PM





Related

If the plans currently under discussion between Saudi Arabia and Pakistan bear fruit, they will signal a further shift in relations between the two countries. Of greater import, however, will be the message they send to Iran.

The plans under discussion revolve around creating an emergency response force inside Saudi Arabia, composed of thousands of Pakistani troops. This brigade would ostensibly be there to "bulk up" Riyadh’s military at a time when the kingdom is fighting an intense war in Yemen. That Pakistan would send troops to a GCC country is not especially new – novel, certainly, but Pakistani troops have in the past provided assistance to Saudi Arabia at times of particular danger. They were involved, for example, in the country during the first Gulf War.

But there is a wider message being conveyed. The kingdom was the driving force behind the creation of the "Muslim Nato", as the Islamic Military Alliance to Fight Terrorism, a coalition of 39 Muslim countries, is sometimes called. This coalition – which excludes Iran – is meant to be headed by a retired Pakistani army chief, General Raheel Sharif, although he appears to still be clarifying his role, and more broadly Islamabad has been hesitant to take sides so overtly between Saudi Arabia and Iran.

Yet the recent move signals that Islamabad has decided to prioritise its relationship with Saudi Arabia and the wider Gulf. That ought to be a message – and a warning – to Iran. Tehran needs to recognise that its meddling in the Middle East has profound consequences, for the region and for itself. It is because of Iranian meddling in Iraq, Syria, Yemen and elsewhere that so much of the sectarian conflicts in the region has been created or exacerbated.

It is the Saudi reaction to that meddling that has resulted in the creation of this coalition. And by allowing Pakistani troops into the kingdom, Islamabad is showing that it, too, recognises how important defeating terrorism and instability is for Pakistan itself – after all, the sectarianism that has been inflamed in the Middle East also has an effect in Pakistan. The two regions are interlinked.

Hopefully Tehran will get the message. When a country on its eastern flank, Pakistan, sends troops to a country to its west, in part to defend against conflicts that Tehran itself has stoked, it should be obvious that Iran is not behaving responsibly in its own neighbourhood. Tehran’s policies are pushing countries around it closer together.

One-page article

If the plans currently under discussion between Saudi Arabia and Pakistan bear fruit, they will signal a further shift in relations between the two countries. Of greater import, however, will be the message they send to Iran.

The plans under discussion revolve around creating an emergency response force inside Saudi Arabia, composed of thousands of Pakistani troops. This brigade would ostensibly be there to "bulk up" Riyadh’s military at a time when the kingdom is fighting an intense war in Yemen. That Pakistan would send troops to a GCC country is not especially new – novel, certainly, but Pakistani troops have in the past provided assistance to Saudi Arabia at times of particular danger. They were involved, for example, in the country during the first Gulf War.

But there is a wider message being conveyed. The kingdom was the driving force behind the creation of the "Muslim Nato", as the Islamic Military Alliance to Fight Terrorism, a coalition of 39 Muslim countries, is sometimes called. This coalition – which excludes Iran – is meant to be headed by a retired Pakistani army chief, General Raheel Sharif, although he appears to still be clarifying his role, and more broadly Islamabad has been hesitant to take sides so overtly between Saudi Arabia and Iran.

Yet the recent move signals that Islamabad has decided to prioritise its relationship with Saudi Arabia and the wider Gulf. That ought to be a message – and a warning – to Iran. Tehran needs to recognise that its meddling in the Middle East has profound consequences, for the region and for itself. It is because of Iranian meddling in Iraq, Syria, Yemen and elsewhere that so much of the sectarian conflicts in the region has been created or exacerbated.

It is the Saudi reaction to that meddling that has resulted in the creation of this coalition. And by allowing Pakistani troops into the kingdom, Islamabad is showing that it, too, recognises how important defeating terrorism and instability is for Pakistan itself – after all, the sectarianism that has been inflamed in the Middle East also has an effect in Pakistan. The two regions are interlinked.

Hopefully Tehran will get the message. When a country on its eastern flank, Pakistan, sends troops to a country to its west, in part to defend against conflicts that Tehran itself has stoked, it should be obvious that Iran is not behaving responsibly in its own neighbourhood. Tehran’s policies are pushing countries around it closer together.
We even dont respond to the mortars fired by Irani forces on Pakistan. We even dont respond when Iran recruits warrior from Pakistan to fight in Syria. How come some can think that we are sending our troops to fight Iran? Nonsense. We care for Iran, whether Iran cares for us or not.
And Saudia is also our brotherly country. If they requested for some assistance, we must respond. And we will insure that its not against Iran or any other friendly country.
 
. .
i can feel third party will create miss understanding no doubt in it. Pakistan proposed that Iran must be invited and added into the coalition. but what Pakistan can do, if this proposal would n`t be accepted. we need to understand to each other rather then accepting the propaganda by 3rd party. Pakistan can play it`s role only if there would be no command above Pakistan in this coalition.

so kindly dont tell us that what Pakistan forces are doing there, what we need to know is there any command above pakistan or not, in order to create peace between Saudi and iran?
write down my words if there is only the physical face of Pakistan ex army chief but the dictation/direction will come from others and not from pakistan, there will be no peace at all.
 
Last edited:
.
I don't think Pakistan will do anything against Iran.. Saudi Arabia and Iran both are equally important to Pakistan..
 
.
As long as Pakistan is in the coalition Iran has a friend there... Pakistan army can't will never be part of any anti Iran coalition ...
 
.
Iran says they do not support houthis, so nothing to fret about it.we kicked houthis in 60s we will kick them now too. If they ever so try to cross Arabian borders. Since Iran doesn't support houthi nor any irani is there. It's ok
 
Last edited:
. .
Both Arabs and Iranians need to grow up and stop their proxy wars, destroying poor middle eastern nations while they both sit comfortably doing deals with Kafir countries themselves. I guess that's acceptable, but heaven forbid Muslims of different sects get on with each other.

Idiots.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom