Chemical agriculture
PAKISTAN has been swamped by inferiority complex of its policy makers, a majority of whom were never leaders but were followers. You might put the same question to me and I would plead guilty for not trying hard enough and for not being persuasive enough to force my point of view. I have always believed in probabilities and possibilities and not on scientific certainty.
A human failing that brought me in conflict with pseudo scientists. The pseudo scientists that I have been talking about are either obsolete or simply technologist and they have been suitably brainwashed by the West. What little is left of conviction is made up by the juggernaut work of the multinationals corporations [MNC] who do not want the locals to apply their mind for that would cut into their profits and they are the shylocks looking for every pound of flesh irrespective whether the blood flows from the wound or not.
It was since 1987 that I have been advocating that chemical fertilisers especially DAP is harmful and injurious to our soils. That nitrogen is not balanced with either phosphate or potassium. The MNCs are a difficult power bloc and they can steam roll any one. If you do not believe me then you have to either see Tim Sebastians hard talk in which Naomi Klein authoress of No Logo talks of the helplessness of the developed countries what to speak of the developing countries, which live in a soft state all the time vis a vis these MNCs. When chemical agriculture came in 1960 there were food shortages and Borlaug cashed in on the state of shortages.
Chemical agriculture was supposed to be the miracle that would ward of hunger and poverty forever. It did so for a while but the unintended consequences of the continuous use of chemicals led to alkaline soils development and we know that within a certain framework that was counterproductive so far as agriculture productivity was concerned. This is now an albatross round the neck of the farmers and the country. If everything remains as they were the year before then each year the farmer has to use 10 per cent more of the chemical fertilisers.
The fact is that with prices going as they are cartelisation of the producers of fertiliser has been used by developed countries to force the hand of the developing countries. The industry headquarters is in Atlanta USA where all this price fixing goes on. Neo liberal polices are not used when it comes to cartelisation of this kind. This is subtle imperialism of the West and is of a more sinister form as policy makers of developing countries are unable to understand the implication for countries like Pakistan. The price fixation is due to capital cost that is based on monopoly pricing for machinery and the royalty that is charged in perpetuity.
To overcome this, Sartaj Aziz as the minister devised an equalisation formula for the inefficient Fauji fertiliser by equalising the price of the most efficient producers and the least efficient and dividing that by the number of players. The negotiated price of machinery for the new manufacturing unit as doctored and was much more than the given international price. Despite the lopsided benefits to Fauji fertiliser Sartaj Azizs formula was a pragmatic solution to a problem that our policy makers had used for the setting up of an expensive fertiliser industry.
When such an industry comes in to play then the manufacturers make sure that it is priced such that it can, in the foreseeable future ensure, that the commodities produced by the use of these fertilisers are not able to compete in world markets. The same thing happened with the Fauji bin Qasim for its DAP plant with one exception that they also started manoeuvring for subsidies which they got thanks to the then commerce minister. He gained rich dividends for his act of misplaced generosity to the few and polices against the many. In return, he was a major player in some of the most lucrative projects that the government gave to him without due process.
If not chemical agriculture what then? The advantages of organic agriculture have not been understood by our policy makers who are in the habit of taking short-term measures. In an arid agriculture economy it is necessary to understand the advantages of organic agriculture. There are methods available for the conversion of organic waste in short time, a method that was devised by the Japanese and upon which we came to by accident. The decomposed humus is a source of 90 to 95 per cent soil nitrogen including that which is cycled through microorganisms.
When organic matter makes up more than two per cent of the soils it can be a major source of available phosphorous. At the moment our soils are either completely devoid of organic matter or very insignificant amount given our use of chemical fertiliser.
It is a major source of the strengthening necessary to create strong soil structures with a higher proportion of larger pores that improves water holding capacity and water and air movement in the soils. A requirement that is essential on the Pakistani scene because of shortage of water.
As a result of chemical fertilisers our soils have become sieves with much reduced water holding capacities. It is also true that such organically developed soils provides 30 to 70 per cent of the negatively charged sites that hold nutrient cations plants can use [unheard of by Pakistani farmers-large or small]. The electrical property this gives to the organic matter leads to the ability of the soil to act as a buffering agent, moderating the tendency to change ph when alkaline or acid substances are added to the soil.
Organic matter also works as a Chelate, that is, it forms compounds with metal nutrients (sually iron, zinc, copper, or manganese) increasing their solubility and availability to plants. Besides it supplies carbon for energy to many soil micro-organisms that perform beneficial functions such as nitrogen fixation.
I have given a few of the benefits of organic agriculture. The main problem seems to be in handling and spreading of the organic matter in a systematic manner. Conveniences can now be built in to the system thanks to the work of Dr Tahir, formerly dean of soil sciences, University of Faisalabad (now working with his own NGO). A person who is given to convictions and courage despite being ridiculed by all those that were touts to the chemical industry. He has now been able to bag the organic material with various formations in which he has used sugar mill sludge, poultry manure, and has also mineralised the organic material by reinforcing it with gypsum and thus making the organic matter work as chelate and fixing the phosphorous in a soluble manner for the uptake by the plants.
Organic agriculture with its concomitants is such that our soils are improved; the cost of production reduced and the farmers rehabilitation made possible. Research elsewhere has shown that the previous held notion that there will be a ten per cent reduction in productivity is now proved to be wrong. In any case what have you got from chemical agriculture in the last five years with all these shortages? The small farmer especially will be a gainer for a bag of fertiliser of these kind cost only Rs300. They have taken away ten years of farmers welfare as a result. How unfortunate such crimes go undetected?
Chemical agriculture -DAWN - Business; June 23, 2008