Global Competitiveness Index places Pakistan at 91
ISLAMABAD (September 28 2006): Pakistan has been ranked at Number 91, among 125 countries, up by three points over previous year, in the global race for competitiveness, according to Global Competitiveness Report 2006-07, released by World Economic Forum.
However, it (Pakistan) was 48 places behind India (at No 43) and 12 places from Sri Lanka, at 79, but ahead of Bangladesh,' at 99, and Nepal at 110. The Global Competitiveness Index (GCI) "provides a holistic overview of factors that are critical to driving productivity and competitiveness".
It is these nine factors i.e. institutions, infrastructure, macroeconomy, health and primary education, higher education and training, market efficiency, technological readiness, business sophistication and innovation that finally are put together based on which countries are ranked.
Pakistan scored relatively well on market efficiency (ranked 54th) with "business sophistication" and "innovation" (ranked 60th and 66th respectively). India performed very well on market efficiency (21), business sophistication (25) and innovation (26). The best in innovation category is Japan, followed by Switzerland, Germany, the US and Sweden. China, at 57, is way down.
What has pulled down Pakistan's score is its 'basic requirements'. At 91, it is far below India's 60, China 44 or US 27. Within this, Pakistan's worst scores come, predictably, in the areas of "health and primary education" (rank 108), higher education and training (104), technological readiness (89) and macroeconomy (86).
Infrastructure, one of the basic prerequisite for robust economic growth, is not doing so badly (rank 67), while the country scored relatively bad in its "institutions" (rank 79). India was ranked 62 and 34 respectively in these categories. In the area of "efficiency enhancers," Pakistan was ranked exact to its total ranking at 91.
The report says, "The value of increased spending on education will be undermined if rigidities in the labour market and other institutional weaknesses make it difficult for new graduates to gain access to suitable employment opportunities. Attempts to improve the macroeconomic environment-e.g., bringing public finances under control-are more likely to be successful and receive public support in countries where there is reasonable transparency in the management of public resources, as opposed to widespread corruption and abuse".
Innovation or the adoption of new technologies or upgrading management practices will most likely not receive broad-based support in the business community if protection of the domestic market ensures that the returns on rent-seeking are higher than those for new investments. Therefore, the most competitive economies in the world will typically be those where concerted efforts have been made to frame comprehensive policies, that is, those which recognise the importance of a broad array of factors, their interconnection, and the need to address the underlying weaknesses they reveal in a proactive way.
This year, over 11,000 business leaders polled in record 125 economies world-wide. The survey questionnaire is designed to capture a broad range of factors affecting an economy's business climate that are critical determinants of sustained economic growth. The Forum annually delivers a comprehensive overview of the main strengths and weaknesses in a large number of countries, making it possible to identify key areas for policy formulation and reforms.