A.Rahman
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 12, 2006
- Messages
- 4,728
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
- Location
Owais said:Trade deficit widens
ISLAMABAD (July 19 2006): Pakistan's trade deficit widened to a provisional $1.47 billion in June from $1.16 billion in May and $697 million in June 2005, official data showed on Tuesday. The trade deficit for fiscal year 2005/06 that ended on June 30 widened to a provisional $12.11 billion from $6.21 billion in 2004/05.
here is some inertesting piece of info:
Most economists do not believe that trade deficits are inherently good or bad; some even believe they should be ignored entirely. They do believe, however, that trade deficits are generally harmful when countries engage in currency controls such as fixed or pegged exchange rates. They argue that fixed exchange rates do not allow the market to naturally correct any current account ââ¬Åproblemsââ¬Â.
Milton Friedman has argued that many of the fears of trade deficits are unfair criticisms in an attempt to push macroeconomic policies favorable to export industries. He states that these deficits are not harmful to the country as the currency always comes back to the country of origin in some form or another (country A sells to country B, country B sells to country C who buys from country A, but the trade deficit only includes A and B). He continues by informing readers that the "worst case scenario" of the currency never returning to the country of origin is actually the best possible outcome; as the country just purchased goods by exchanging pieces of cheaply made paper. The same result would happen if the exporting country burned the dollars it earned, never returning it to market circulation.
If these current account "problems" become unstable and unsustainable, Friedman notes that the market will correct any "problems" as floating currency rates will rise or fall with time to encourage or discourage imports in favor of the exports, and then possibly reverse again in favor of imports as the currency gains strength.
Friedman and other economists also point out that a large trade deficit (importation of goods) signals that the currency of this country is strong and desirable. Citizens of such a country also receive the benefit of having the ability to choose between many competing consumables and lower prices than they would otherwise experience if the currency was weaker and the country was "enjoying" a trade surplus. To Milton Friedman, a trade deficit simply means that consumers get to purchase and enjoy more goods at lower prices; conversely, a trade surplus implies that a country exported goods that its own citizens did not get to consume and enjoy, while paying high prices for the goods that were consumed.